PLAN AND PRODUCE A PRODUCT
Position paper
Model
Proposal
Graphic
Map
Mind map
Plan
Summary
Article
Column
Game
Piece of art
Annotated bibliography
White paper
Letter to editor
Essay
Assessment
Story
Documentary
Flow chart
Diagram
Journal entry
Script
News copy
Prototype
Program
EIGHT CATEGORIES
OF RAPIDS
PRESENT
Live speech
Reading
Video
Multi-media
Animation
Poster
Drama
Debate
Story
Song
PERFORM
Skill
Skill set
Procedure
Interaction
PARTICIPATE
Internship
Practicum
Lab experiment
Community service task
PROJECTS
PROBLEM SOLVE
Identify a problem
State a problem
Formulate questions
Ask questions
Recommend solutions
Defend recommendations
Document process
Critique process
TEACH OTHERS
Tutor
Train
Demonstrate
Assess/critique
Give feedback
Guide practice
COMPILE
Portfolio
e-file
TAKE A TEST
Multiple choice
True/false
Short answer
Fill-in
The Key to Performance Assessment: The Scoring Guide
The scoring guide establishes a target that does not move. It allows students to hit a target if they know what it is and that it is not moving.
What is a Scoring Guide?
- An established set of criteria with descriptors for scoring or rating students' performance on such tasks as writing, speaking, science experiments, peer reviews of projects and products, and teaching and training.
- What differs from traditional tests and exams is that the learners know the criteria before they perform the task. The criteria are embedded in the instruction.
Value/Merits of the Scoring Guide:
- establishes clear criteria/goals/targets/outcomes
- provides feedback re. strengths and weaknesses
- maintains consistently the same language/vocabulary
- integrates assessment and instruction
- helps in instructors being consistent in evaluation of learners
- assists self-directed learning
TITLE: Assessing Your Ability To Make a Presentation
(Effectively communicates in a clear and well-organized manner to persuade, inform, and convey ideas in academic, work, family and community settings)
Directions: Self-assess each factor below using the following rating scale.
Quality Factors: 1= absent; 2=minimally met: 3= adequately met ; 4= exceptionally met
1. Written outline 1 2 3 4Factor Average
has clear focus of topic /contains detail
includes works cited
integrates Maslow’s hierarchy of needs
2. Topic … 1 2 3 4Factor Average
is appropriate for audience /is well researched
cites a minimum of 3 sources
3. Presentation 1 2 3 4Factor Average
establishes clear proposition with sufficient detail /shows excitement of own topic
is well sequenced
supports proposition with detailed arguments
uses persuasive techniques to support proposition
sustained eye-contact with audience members
enunciates clearly and uses verbal cues to emphasize
applies varied appeals: pathos and/or ethos
uses non-verbal cues
uses audio-visuals for in-depth (further) explanation
projects voice with adequate loudness and quality
observes time limits
ends with synthesizing/summarizing proposition
Check One: ____ Self-assessment Average Score:______
____ Peer Assessment by______
____ Instructor Assessment by ______Standard: Average 3.0 or higher;
No factor less than 2.5
Template: Scoring Guide
Name:______Course/Project Title______Start:______Finish:______
TITLE: ( with the intended learning outcome(s) stated)
Directions:
Rating Scale:
Quality Factors
1.______
- ______1234
- ______1234
- ______1234 Factor
- ______1234 Average
- ______1234
2.______
- ______1234
- ______1234
- ______1234 Factor
- ______1234 Average
- ______1234
3.______
- ______1234
- ______1234
- ______1234 Factor
- ______1234 Average
- ______1234
4.______
- ______1234
- ______1234
- ______1234 Factor
- ______1234 Average
- ______1234
Check One: ____ Self-assessment Average Score:______
____ Peer Assessment by______
____ Instructor Assessment by ______Standard: Average 3.0 or higher;
No factor less than 2.5