Potential Ways of Responding to Questions of 7/26/2012

Potential ways of responding to questions of 7/26/2012

Context To provide context for the data we were able to provide with our Institutional Report, please recognize:

Our Transformation Initiative, first submitted in fall, 2009 (subsequently revised and resubmitted 2010 and 2011) was not reviewed until Spring, 2012. As one of the early Transformation Initiative institutions, we were provided little structure or feedback related to our efforts. We were not fully implementing because we did not have information as to how the Initiative had been perceived.
Our IR was uploaded in April 2012 as required; data for 2012 and the summer are in the process of being summarized and analyzed.
Evidence in some situations (such as the Teacher Performance Assessment) are not under our control.

We will do our best to respond to any data needs or requests as quickly as possible. We have continued to hone our data collection and analysis, and with the change in our web-based assessment tool (now Qualtrics) we are able to more quickly respond to requests.

Question: 82.7% of school-based diversity was reported as unknown

Our initial data collection system of mentor (school-based faculty) qualifications did not include race. The demographics form provided by NCATE related to faculty demographics indicates “include school-based faculty if possible”. The data reported were those provided voluntarily in response to a request to university supervisors. Recognizing the issues related to this incomplete data and our challenges to provide a diverse experience for our candidates, we revised our data collection system and implemented a direct survey at the end of Fall 2011. These are the data from the most recent survey:

Ohio general population: 11.5% black, 1.9 Latino, Asian <1%
Hamilton County Public School Teacher Statistics: 93.8% white, 5% black. .6% Latino, .1% American Indian or Alaskan Native, .2% multiracial or did not specify
Mentor Teacher Demographics
Response / %
7-12 English/Language Arts / 26 / 8%
7-12 Social Studies / 28 / 9%
7-12 Mathematics / 29 / 9%
7-12 Sciences / 26 / 8%
Multiage Foreign Language / 8 / 3%
Early Childhood Education / 31 / 10%
Middle Level Education / 23 / 7%
Intervention Specialist: Mild/Moderate / 43 / 14%
Intervention Specialist: Moderate/Intense / 24 / 8%
Multiage Art / 21 / 7%
Multiage Music / 0 / 0%
Elementary Education / 82 / 27%
Other / 61 / 20%
License:
Professional / 238 / 78%
Permanent (certificate) / 54 / 18%
Lead Professional Educator / 10 / 3%
Senior Professional Educator / 3 / 1%
Education:
Masters / 245 / 81%
Additional graduate work / 52 / 17%
Doctorate / 5 / 2%
Total / 302 / 100%
Please indicate all that apply to you:
National Board Certified / 19 / 14%
Resident Educator Mentor or District Mentor / 48 / 35%
Teacher Leader Endorsement / 32 / 23%
Other awards or recognitions / 75 / 54%
Race:
Latino of any race / 3 / 1%
Black or African American / 33 / 11%
American Indian or Alaskan Native / 0 / 0%
Asian / 5 / 2%
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander / 0 / 0%
White / 263 / 87%
Total / 304 / 100%

Question: Data from current pilot of the focused dispositions assessment were not available

Data collection was still underway when the IR was submitted. The spring pilot of the focused dispositions form yielded these data (items highlighted in yellow are areas for fall discussion with programs):

2012 Pilot of Detailed Dispositions Form for Urban Teachers
Please indicate the focus or foci of this observation. You will then be directed to a specific set of indicators.
# / %
Rapport and relationships with students / 56 / 45%
Communication and classroom language / 39 / 31%
Motivating students / 24 / 19%
Learning environment / 23 / 18%
Instructional management / 41 / 33%
Instruction / 41 / 33%
Assessment / 18 / 14%
Initiative / 34 / 27%
Reflection / 34 / 27%
Differentiating instruction / 17 / 14%
Culturally responsive instruction / 24 / 19%
Rapport and relationships with students / Strength / Observed sometimes or emerging / Point for discussion / Responses
I-Thou Interaction - interacts with each student at a person to person level / 29 / 14 / 1 / 44
Calls students by name / 28 / 15 / 1 / 44
Greets students at the door / 10 / 32 / 1 / 43
Makes personal conversation with students with more than superficial knowledge / 24 / 17 / 2 / 43
Smiles / 37 / 7 / 0 / 44
Makes eye contact / 39 / 3 / 1 / 43
Active listening - reflects back the emotion in a clarifying statement / 29 / 13 / 1 / 43
Gives evidence of having heard the student by reflecting the idea of feelings of the student / 26 / 15 / 1 / 42
Jokes to relieve tension / 20 / 22 / 1 / 43
Asks questions and makes comments that demonstrate personal interest / 30 / 13 / 1 / 44
Show humor / 25 / 18 / 0 / 43
Provides praise and reprimand without producing student embarrassment / 25 / 19 / 0 / 44
Show respect and give compliments / 39 / 5 / 0 / 44
Encourages attendance and enthusiastically personally attends extra curricular activities / 17 / 16 / 6 / 39
Communication and classroom language / Strength / Observed sometimes or emerging / Point for discussion / Responses
Welcoming tone of voice / 24 / 7 / 0 / 31
Reflects a calm visage / 25 / 4 / 0 / 29
Clarifies understanding, recognizing that they may be responsible for the lack of understanding / 17 / 11 / 1 / 29
Paraphrases and expands on student ideas / 16 / 13 / 1 / 30
Provides support (e.g., "I appreciate how difficult this seems.") / 17 / 13 / 1 / 31
Varies pitch, volume, and inflection / 15 / 11 / 4 / 30
Nods and gestures to encourage and demonstrate enthusiasm / 21 / 9 / 1 / 31
Motivating students / Strength / Observed sometimes or emerging / Point for discussion / Responses
Encouraging feedback, such as complimenting sincerely / 15 / 4 / 1 / 20
Praises the accomplishment/achievement / 15 / 4 / 1 / 20
Challenges students to think, problem solve, take up the challenge / 10 / 8 / 3 / 21
Asks questions that intrigue students / 5 / 14 / 1 / 20
Relates to students experiences in their community, as a class, as members of a school / 9 / 10 / 1 / 20
Provides a rationale for the lesson, concept, skill that is accepted by students / 8 / 12 / 0 / 20
Allows students to make some decisions / 14 / 6 / 0 / 20
Involves students in discussion, activity, or teaching / 18 / 2 / 0 / 20
Enforces classroom routines / 11 / 6 / 0 / 17
Uses cooperative/collaborative learning structures / 11 / 9 / 0 / 20
Praises the accomplishment/achievement / 16 / 3 / 1 / 20
Learning Environment / Strength / Observed sometimes or emerging / Point for discussion / Responses
Written communication is legible, clear, and attractive / 16 / 4 / 0 / 20
Books readily available in the room / 6 / 7 / 4 / 17
Relevant posters, changed frequently / 11 / 5 / 2 / 18
Pictures of the class/students / 5 / 6 / 4 / 15
Computers/software available and in use for reinforcing instruction / 6 / 7 / 4 / 17
Videos used as instructional media / 10 / 4 / 2 / 16
Arranges the classroom to facilitate interaction / 6 / 7 / 4 / 17
Instructional Management / Strength / Observed sometimes or emerging / Point for discussion / Responses
Clarifies how the student might use feelings constructively / 10 / 18 / 0 / 28
Manages classrooms through clear procedures which are verbalized and reviewed / 13 / 19 / 2 / 34
Provides opportunities to make decisions about procedures / 14 / 18 / 0 / 32
Refrains from using negative judgments (e.g. should never, everybody ought, any fifth grader would understand this) / 27 / 4 / 0 / 31
Uses explicit reprimands (In this room people are quiet while others are talking. Please keep quiet for our speaker). / 13 / 19 / 0 / 32
Makes statements regarding self-management and personal responsibility rather than relying on teacher presence and control / 15 / 15 / 0 / 30
Moves around the classroom / 26 / 4 / 3 / 33
Assumes role of learner, listener, supportive adult as needed / 26 / 6 / 0 / 32
Provides clear rules and procedures / 14 / 17 / 1 / 32
Actively teaches rules and procedures / 15 / 16 / 0 / 31
Consistent with rules/procedures / 20 / 12 / 0 / 32
Reminds students of rules / 13 / 18 / 0 / 31
Provides nonverbal signals that behaviors need to change / 12 / 17 / 1 / 30
Consistently and fairly provides natural consequences / 7 / 20 / 1 / 28
Uses the least intense correction possible / 20 / 10 / 0 / 30
Ignore minor issues when students continue to be engaged; picks battles / 23 / 8 / 0 / 31
Use rationale rather than power arguments / 16 / 12 / 0 / 28
Respond positively to justified criticism / 23 / 6 / 0 / 29
Provides redundant cues - visual and verbal; kinesthetic and verbal; written and spoken / 12 / 15 / 1 / 28
Appropriate flexibility in applying rules / 17 / 14 / 0 / 31
Makes rules together with students / 6 / 16 / 2 / 24
Instruction / Strength / Observed sometimes or emerging / Point for discussion / Responses
Frequent and varied testing / 7 / 17 / 6 / 30
Provides adequate wait time / 12 / 16 / 5 / 33
Changes tack when lesson is lagging / 8 / 22 / 3 / 33
Probe for students' background, beliefs, and interests / 19 / 14 / 1 / 34
Explain the reason for activities / 12 / 20 / 2 / 34
Uses content specific pedagogy / 21 / 12 / 0 / 33
Assessment / Strength / Observed sometimes or emerging / Point for discussion / Responses
Engages students in evaluating their own work / 7 / 7 / 0 / 14
Engages students in reviewing their progress / 5 / 9 / 0 / 14
Varies assessments using: / 6 / 6 / 1 / 13
learning logs / 3 / 5 / 2 / 10
performances / 6 / 7 / 0 / 13
portfolios/work samples / 6 / 6 / 0 / 12
post-test/pre-test / 4 / 5 / 2 / 11
questioning / 8 / 5 / 0 / 13
students as teachers / 3 / 7 / 0 / 10
Initiative / Strength / Observed sometimes or emerging / Point for discussion / Responses
Seeks or accepts new tasks / 22 / 5 / 1 / 28
Acquires resources for teaching / 17 / 9 / 1 / 27
Identifies a mentor or model teacher who is active, positive, and engaged / 12 / 8 / 0 / 20
Generates new ideas, relationships, applications, products / 15 / 6 / 4 / 25
Seeks out and uses data and strategies to address classroom concerns / 11 / 11 / 2 / 24
Consciously modifies behavior toward students to obtain desirable results / 10 / 12 / 0 / 22
Makes predictions about the effort of one's behavior on students and tests those predictions / 13 / 8 / 1 / 22
Reflection / Strength / Observed sometimes or emerging / Point for discussion / Responses
Separates one's opinions from data / 18 / 5 / 1 / 24
Verbalizes that conditions or events can improve / 19 / 7 / 0 / 26
Uses data as opposed to acting on impulse / 13 / 12 / 0 / 25
Analyzes own behavior / 20 / 6 / 0 / 26
Believes students are capable of liking him or her / 24 / 3 / 0 / 27
Differentiating Instruction / Strength / Observed sometimes or emerging / Point for discussion / Responses
Analyzes student work and reteaches / 8 / 3 / 0 / 11
Implements IEP identified accommodations and adaptations / 3 / 6 / 2 / 11
Adaptive technology / 4 / 5 / 1 / 10
Alternative activities / 4 / 5 / 0 / 9
Inclusive instruction / 8 / 4 / 0 / 12
Independent study / 3 / 4 / 1 / 8
Learning contracts / 3 / 5 / 1 / 9
One on one / 12 / 1 / 0 / 13
Peer support / 7 / 4 / 0 / 11
Small groups / 9 / 3 / 0 / 12
Varied assignments and activities; no single activity/assignment longer than 20 minutes without movement or change / 8 / 5 / 0 / 13
Varied texts / 7 / 4 / 1 / 12
Culturally Responsive Instruction / Strength / Observed sometimes or emerging / Point for discussion / Responses
Persevere despite challenges that may arise / 12 / 4 / 0 / 16
Demonstrate commitment to carrying out all objectives, activities, and projects to promote high standards / 14 / 2 / 0 / 16
Describe challenges through multiple lenses / 12 / 4 / 0 / 16
Demonstrate unique paths to problem solving / 11 / 3 / 0 / 14
Hold high expectations / 16 / 0 / 0 / 16
Emphasize strengths rather than deficits / 14 / 1 / 0 / 15
Demonstrates self-examination regarding relationships / 11 / 4 / 0 / 15
Creates learning opportunities adapted to diverse populations / 11 / 3 / 0 / 14
Ardently interested / 12 / 3 / 1 / 16
Persistence / 14 / 2 / 0 / 16
Value of children's learning / 15 / 1 / 0 / 16
Putting ideas into practice / 12 / 3 / 0 / 15
Approach to at-risk students / 12 / 4 / 0 / 16
Professional/personal orientation to students / 12 / 3 / 0 / 15
Professional/personal orientation to bureaucracy / 10 / 5 / 0 / 15
Professional/personal orientation to fallibility / 11 / 4 / 0 / 15
Strong planning and organization / 11 / 4 / 1 / 16

Question: The off-site team was not able to verify any data from these assignments of reflection within an early field experience, if data are ready at this point

Early field experiences are being implemented with the change to semesters in Fall 2012; data are not yet available. Assessments for the assignments in these field experiences are available at: http://www.uc.edu/cech-accreditation/programs/signature-embedded-assessments.html

Question: Half of the advanced candidates’ race/ethnicity reported as unknown

Our data warehouse has recently recoded student data in view of the new federal guidelines. We still have a number of candidates who prefer to indicate “unknown.” In that this is self-reported data it is voluntary, and we have no way to clarify or change the “unknown” race and ethnicity. With the recoding, and pulling data from the 2011-2012 academic year, we were able to derive these data for our advanced candidates:

Race/Ethnicity / # / Percent
American Indian or Alaskan Native / 1 / 0.14%
Asian-Pacific Islander / 5 / 0.71%
Black, Non-Hispanic / 68 / 9.70%
Latino / 11 / 1.60%
Non-Resident Alien / 3 / 0.40%
White / 539 / 76.90%
Mixed Race / 6 / 85.00%
Unknown / 68 / 9.70%
701

Question: Can’t determine specifics for diversity in schools within which candidates do field experiences and frequency of schools used

Because of our large number of field experiences, NCATE required evidence is at the district level (see the directions for the data chart provided by NCATE). We have provided those data at 4.4.g. In an effort to provide more thorough evidence, however, we have provided data for the initial program which indicates the number of schools used in each district and the number of placements in those schools. We have also provided the individual school data with number of placements for schools in Hamilton County, where all but a few placements are made. Advanced program placements are used by only one or two students each year, so we did not break down those data in that way.

4.4.g Data table on demographics of p-12 students in schools used for clinical practice 2011-2012

Initial Program School Districts / Hispanic/Any Race / Native American / Asian / African American / White / Two or More Races / Poverty Level / English Language Learners / Students with Disabilities / Number of schools used / Number of placements
Batavia Local / 2.3% / 0.8% / 2.5% / 89.2% / 5.0% / 0.5% / 13.9% / 1 / 1
Tuslaw Local School District / 97.8% / 0.9% / 14.0% / 1 / 1
Bond Hill Academy / 94.2% / 2.9% / 18.6% / 1 / 1
Bridgeport Schools / 5.8% / 91.1% / 2.6% / 50.5% / 22.0% / 1 / 1
Centerville City Schools / 1.8% / 0.3% / 7.4% / 5.3% / 81.1% / 4.2% / 1.7% / 11.8% / 2 / 2
Lakota Local Schools / 3.9% / 0.1% / 5.6% / 10.0% / 76.1% / 4.9% / 9.7% / 12 / 28
Cincinnati Public Schools / 2.6% / 0.1% / 1.0% / 66.9% / 24.2% / 5.3% / 69.7% / 3.7% / 21.0% / 44 / 318
Clermont North East / 1.0% / 96.3% / 1.8% / 42.6% / 19.8% / 1 / 1
Covington Independent Public Schools / 4.0% / 29.0% / 56.0% / 87.0% / 2.0% / 20.0% / 2 / 5
Fairfield City Schools / 5.7% / 0.2% / 2.3% / 13.9% / 73.0% / 4.9% / 29.4% / 3.9% / 13.2% / 1 / 1
Fayetteville Perry HS / 96.7% / 1.8% / 34.0% / 6 / 10
Forest Hills Schools / 1.5% / 2.1% / 1.5% / 91.7% / 3.1% / 10.8% / 0.5% / 10.3% / 7 / 25
Goshen Schools / 2.1% / 0.7% / 94.5% / 2.2% / 47.8% / 19.0% / 2 / 2
Hamilton City Schools / 8.1% / 0.7% / 10.7% / 75.4% / 5.1% / 69.2% / 4.1% / 16.6% / 5 / 15
Hamilton County Department of Developmental Disabilities / Other data are not available / 100.0% / 100.0% / 4 / 45
Indian Hill Exempted Village / 2.1% / 7.5% / 3.6% / 83.8% / 2.9% / 5.1% / 0.9% / 8.7% / 3 / 3
Dayton Public Schools / 3.2% / 0.4% / 67.1% / 25.2% / 4.1% / 92.5% / 3.2% / 19.8% / 2 / 2
Kings Local High School / 4.2% / 2.0% / 1.6% / 89.1% / 3.0% / 17.1% / 2.0% / 13.3% / 3 / 7
Newport Independent Schools / 2.0% / 12.0% / 75.0% / 85.0% / 2.0% / 16.0% / 1 / 8
North College Hill City Schools / 74.5% / 17.9% / 6.5% / 68.8% / 0.8% / 19.1% / 1 / 5
Norwood Special Learning Center / 1.2% / 0.6% / 8.9% / 89.0% / 72.1% / 100.0% / 2 / 2
Kenton County Schools (KY) / 1.3% / 40.0% / 1.4% / 2.3% / 95.5% / 11.0% / 3 / 3
Advanced Program School Districts / Hispanic/Any Race / Native American / Asian / African American / White / Two or More Races / Poverty Level / English Language Learners / Students with Disabilities
Ashtabula Area City School District / 10.60% / 0.40% / 8.80% / 69.20% / 10.90% / 71.30% / 4.70% / 19.90%
Bethel Local School District / 2.30% / 95.20% / 12.60% / 2.10% / 8.90%
Brunswick City Schools / 1.70% / 1.30% / 1.50% / 92.70% / 2.70% / 23.50% / 0.70% / 10.50%
Cincinnati Public Schools / 2.60% / 0.10% / 1.00% / 66.90% / 24.20% / 5.30% / 69.70% / 3.70% / 21.00%
Claymont City Schools / 0.80% / 0.70% / 95.30% / 3.00% / 61.00% / 22.00%
Cleveland Metropolitan School District / 13.20% / 0.20% / 0.70% / 68.20% / 14.60% / 3.00% / 100.00% / 6.10% / 22.90%
Columbus City Schools / 6.80% / 0.20% / 2.10% / 58.90% / 27.00% / 5.10% / 81.90% / 9.70% / 17.10%
Deer Park Schools / 3.00% / 2.50% / 7.00% / 80.80% / 6.70% / 40.90% / 1.60% / 14.60%
Fairfield City Schools / 5.70% / 0.20% / 2.30% / 13.90% / 73.00% / 4.90% / 29.40% / 3.90% / 13.20%
Forest Hills Schools / 1.50% / 2.10% / 1.50% / 91.70% / 3.10% / 10.80% / 0.50% / 10.30%
Hamilton City Schools / 8.10% / 0.70% / 10.70% / 75.40% / 5.10% / 69.20% / 4.10% / 16.60%
Hilliard City Schools / 4.80% / 0.20% / 6.00% / 5.70% / 78.70% / 4.70% / 22.40% / 7.30% / 11.40%
Lakota Local / 3.90% / 0.10% / 5.60% / 10.00% / 76.10% / 4.30% / 14.60% / 4.90% / 9.70%
Lighthouse Community / 100% / 85%
Mad River Schools / 5.00% / 0.40% / 2.30% / 8.40% / 78.30% / 5.70% / 51.90% / 0.80% / 13.00%
Mariemont City Schools / 1.00% / 1.20% / 2.10% / 93.20% / 2.40% / 8.20% / 10.10%
Martins Ferry Schools / 0.90% / 5.40% / 87.90% / 5.40% / 56.20% / 20.10%
Mason city Schools / 3.30% / 0.10% / 14.10% / 3.50% / 75.30% / 3.60% / 6.40% / 2.40% / 9.10%
Middletown City / 6.60% / 0.30% / 16.20% / 67.10% / 9.70% / 71.50% / 4.20% / 16.80%
Monroe Local Schools / 4.30% / 1.40% / 3.70% / 87.30% / 3.20% / 25.20% / 2.80% / 11.30%
New Albany-Plain Local School District / 2.90% / 10.30% / 6.10% / 76.70% / 4.00% / 7.00% / 1.90% / 11.30%
Nordonia Hills City School District / 1.60% / 3.40% / 12.40% / 79.90% / 2.50% / 21.30% / 1.00% / 10.20%
North Olmsted City Schools / 3.40% / 3.10% / 2.60% / 86.90% / 4.00% / 38.60% / 6.60% / 14.20%
Northwest School District / 1.70% / 1.50% / 24.70% / 64.90% / 7.20% / 45.10% / 2.10% / 14.50%
Norwood City Schools / 8.20% / 0.60% / 9.60% / 77.80% / 3.40% / 60.40% / 5.50% / 16.10%
Olentangy Local School District / 2.30% / 0.10% / 7.20% / 4.00% / 82.70% / 3.70% / 7.40% / 1.70% / 11.10%
Pickerington Schools / 4.40% / 0.20% / 3.30% / 17.90% / 66.60% / 7.70% / 16.60% / 2.70% / 12.40%
South-Western City Schools District / 10.30% / 0.20% / 2.00% / 12.10% / 71.00% / 4.40% / 54.60% / 10.90% / 14.50%
Springboro Community Schools / 1.20% / 3.10% / 1.60% / 91.40% / 2.60% / 6.30% / 0.40% / 12.30%
Sycamore Schools / 3.30% / 11.80% / 7.70% / 71.60% / 5.60% / 16.00% / 3.70% / 10.50%
Upper Arlington Schools / 0.90% / 6.10% / 0.80% / 89.60% / 2.50% / 1.40% / 1.10% / 8.80%
West Clermont Schools / 1.40% / 0.10% / 1.30% / 1.20% / 93.70% / 2.40% / 31.40% / 1.10% / 14.00%

Individual School Data for Hamilton County (in the format provided by the state):

Organization / # Place-ments / Race / Economic Disadvantage Flag / Limited English Proficiency Flag (Enrollment) / 2010-2011 School Year
2011-2012 / Enrollment / Pct of Total Enrollment
Academy for Multilingual Immersion Studies / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 32 / 11.1%
1 / Y / Yes / 45 / 21.7%
No / 216 / 76.0%
Hispanic / Y / Yes / 143 / 69.2%
No / 16 / 5.6%
Multiracial / Y / No / 11 / 3.9%
Academy Of World Languages Elementary School / Asian / Y / Yes / 33 / 14.6%
Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 41 / 12.0%
1 / Y / Yes / 115 / 51.0%
No / 270 / 78.5%
Hispanic / Y / Yes / 48 / 21.3%
White, Non-Hispanic / Y / Yes / 16 / 7.2%
Aiken College and Career High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 148 / 22.0%
10 / Y / No / 480 / 71.4%
Multiracial / Y / No / 16 / 2.3%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 12 / 1.8%
Carson Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 29 / 4.3%
Y / No / 320 / 47.7%
4 / Hispanic / Y / Yes / 21 / 81.5%
Multiracial / Y / No / 49 / 7.3%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 31 / 4.5%
Y / No / 233 / 34.8%
Chase Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 14 / 4.2%
Y / No / 270 / 82.6%
1 / Multiracial / Y / No / 14 / 4.4%
White, Non-Hispanic / Y / No / 22 / 6.6%
Cheviot Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 17 / 2.9%
Y / No / 154 / 27.4%
4 / Multiracial / Y / No / 42 / 7.4%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 73 / 12.9%
Y / No / 263 / 46.7%
Clark Montessori High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 171 / 25.3%
Y / No / 166 / 24.6%
Multiracial / N / No / 30 / 4.4%
2 / Y / No / 12 / 1.8%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 249 / 36.9%
Y / No / 32 / 4.8%
College Hill Fundamental Academy / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 94 / 19.4%
Y / No / 349 / 72.2%
5 / Multiracial / Y / No / 15 / 3.2%
White, Non-Hispanic / Y / No / 17 / 3.4%
Covedale Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 38 / 6.7%
Y / No / 130 / 22.7%
3 / Multiracial / N / No / 19 / 3.4%
Y / No / 25 / 4.4%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 197 / 34.4%
Y / No / 152 / 26.7%
Ethel M. Taylor Academy / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 62 / 16.1%
1 / Y / No / 296 / 76.7%
Multiracial / Y / No / 18 / 4.7%
Evanston Academy Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 31 / 7.8%
3 / Y / No / 349 / 87.0%
Fairview-Clifton German Language School / Asian / N / No / 26 / 3.8%
Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 67 / 9.9%
13 / Y / No / 97 / 14.3%
Multiracial / N / No / 39 / 5.7%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 393 / 57.7%
Y / No / 38 / 5.6%
Gilbert A. Dater High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 113 / 14.8%
Y / No / 280 / 36.8%
11 / Multiracial / N / No / 10 / 1.4%
Y / No / 20 / 2.7%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 180 / 23.7%
Y / No / 150 / 19.7%
Hartwell Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 31 / 8.2%
Y / No / 164 / 43.8%
Hispanic / Y / Yes / 33 / 79.9%
1 / Multiracial / Y / No / 22 / 6.0%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 32 / 8.4%
Y / No / 111 / 29.6%
Hughes Center High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 83 / 21.2%
Y / No / 250 / 64.0%
13 / White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 31 / 7.9%
Y / No / 17 / 4.3%
Hughes STEM High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 86 / 17.0%
Y / No / 354 / 69.8%
Multiracial / Y / No / 14 / 2.7%
63 / White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 25 / 4.9%
Y / No / 21 / 4.1%
James N. Gamble Montessori High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 72 / 24.6%
Y / No / 120 / 40.7%
1 / Multiracial / N / No / 13 / 4.3%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 52 / 17.6%
Y / No / 28 / 9.6%
John P Parker Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 46 / 10.3%
Y / No / 348 / 77.9%
3 / Multiracial / Y / No / 17 / 3.9%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 10 / 2.2%
Y / No / 15 / 3.5%
Midway Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 41 / 7.1%
Y / Yes / 25 / 47.5%
No / 300 / 52.3%
2 / Hispanic / Y / Yes / 19 / 35.8%
Multiracial / Y / No / 49 / 8.6%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 33 / 5.8%
Y / No / 139 / 24.2%
Mt. Airy Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 40 / 6.9%
Y / Yes / 14 / 69.5%
5 / No / 488 / 83.8%
Multiracial / Y / No / 25 / 4.3%
White, Non-Hispanic / Y / No / 16 / 2.8%
Mt. Washington Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 30 / 7.0%
Y / No / 89 / 20.6%
Multiracial / N / No / 12 / 2.9%
9 / Y / No / 24 / 5.6%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 113 / 26.0%
Y / No / 156 / 36.0%
North Avondale Montessori Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 148 / 30.1%
Y / No / 187 / 37.8%
1 / Multiracial / N / No / 29 / 5.9%
Y / No / 10 / 2.0%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 89 / 18.1%
Y / No / 14 / 2.7%
Oyler School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 21 / 3.4%
Y / No / 142 / 22.8%
13 / Hispanic / Y / No / 13 / 2.1%
Multiracial / Y / No / 25 / 4.0%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 67 / 10.8%
Y / No / 352 / 56.6%
Pleasant Hill Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 62 / 9.2%
2 / Y / No / 570 / 85.1%
Multiracial / Y / No / 19 / 2.9%
Riverview East Academy / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 41 / 8.8%
Y / No / 159 / 33.9%
1 / Multiracial / Y / No / 20 / 4.4%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 58 / 12.5%
Y / No / 181 / 38.6%
Robert A. Taft Information Technology High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 114 / 22.4%
4 / Y / No / 355 / 70.1%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 23 / 4.5%
Roberts Academy: A Paideia Learning Community / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 24 / 4.7%
Y / No / 365 / 71.2%
Hispanic / Y / Yes / 140 / >95%
1 / No / 14 / 2.7%
Multiracial / Y / No / 43 / 8.4%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 12 / 2.3%
Y / No / 49 / 9.5%
Rockdale Academy Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 29 / 6.8%
3 / Y / No / 345 / 82.8%
Multiracial / Y / No / 29 / 7.0%
Roll Hill School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 42 / 7.9%
1 / Y / No / 458 / 85.7%
Multiracial / Y / No / 18 / 3.3%
White, Non-Hispanic / Y / No / 12 / 2.2%
Roselawn Condon Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 56 / 13.0%
4 / Y / No / 352 / 80.9%
Multiracial / Y / No / 13 / 3.0%
Rothenberg Preparatory Academy / 43 / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 13 / 3.9%
Y / No / 300 / 93.1%
Sands Montessori Elementary School / Asian / N / No / 10 / 1.6%
Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 43 / 6.9%
Y / No / 84 / 13.4%
2 / Multiracial / N / No / 39 / 6.2%
Y / No / 16 / 2.5%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 355 / 56.7%
Y / No / 70 / 11.3%
Sayler Park Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / Y / No / 20 / 6.3%
Multiracial / Y / No / 17 / 5.4%
7 / White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 39 / 12.4%
Y / No / 233 / 73.1%
School For Creat & Perf Arts High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 283 / 20.4%
Y / No / 536 / 38.6%
Multiracial / N / No / 45 / 3.2%
9 / Y / No / 61 / 4.4%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 341 / 24.6%
Y / No / 102 / 7.4%
Shroder Paideia High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 163 / 22.9%
Y / No / 487 / 68.6%
Multiracial / N / No / 10 / 1.5%
5 / Y / No / 11 / 1.6%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 22 / 3.1%
Y / No / 12 / 1.7%
Silverton Paideia Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 45 / 13.3%
Y / No / 243 / 71.7%
3 / Multiracial / Y / No / 22 / 6.5%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 11 / 3.1%
Y / No / 11 / 3.3%
South Avondale Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 27 / 5.2%
3 / Y / No / 470 / 91.2%
Multiracial / Y / No / 13 / 2.5%
Walnut Hills High School / Asian / N / No / 53 / 2.5%
Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 420 / 19.6%
Y / No / 286 / 13.3%
Hispanic / N / No / 20 / .9%
6 / Y / No / 13 / .6%
Multiracial / N / No / 93 / 4.3%
Y / No / 24 / 1.1%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 1,133 / 52.8%
Y / No / 96 / 4.5%
Western Hills University High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 114 / 17.4%
Y / No / 399 / 61.1%
5 / Multiracial / Y / No / 35 / 5.4%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 42 / 6.4%
Y / No / 50 / 7.7%
Westwood Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 22 / 7.1%
Y / Yes / 12 / 78.9%
No / 241 / 76.4%
9 / Multiracial / Y / No / 18 / 5.7%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 10 / 3.2%
Y / No / 16 / 5.2%
William H Taft Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 10 / 3.4%
4 / Y / No / 258 / 85.6%
Multiracial / Y / No / 19 / 6.3%
Winton Hills Academy Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 15 / 3.4%
8 / Y / No / 376 / 86.5%
Multiracial / Y / No / 29 / 6.6%
Withrow University High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 228 / 28.9%
Y / No / 514 / 65.3%
8 / Multiracial / Y / No / 11 / 1.4%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 21 / 2.6%
Woodward Career Technical High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 207 / 21.1%
3 / Y / No / 713 / 72.6%
Multiracial / Y / No / 15 / 1.6%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 25 / 2.6%
Y / No / 15 / 1.5%
Deer Park Jr/Sr High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 13 / 2.1%
Y / No / 37 / 6.1%
2 / Multiracial / N / No / 15 / 2.5%
Y / No / 23 / 3.7%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 340 / 55.6%
Y / No / 163 / 26.7%
Finneytown Secondary Campus / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 144 / 18.2%
Y / No / 172 / 21.8%
Multiracial / N / No / 21 / 2.6%
Y / No / 12 / 1.5%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 370 / 46.9%
Y / No / 58 / 7.3%
Anderson High School / Asian / N / No / 16 / 1.3%
Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 16 / 1.3%
8 / Y / No / 11 / .9%
Hispanic / N / No / 15 / 1.2%
Multiracial / N / No / 32 / 2.5%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 1,073 / 83.8%
Y / No / 104 / 8.1%
Ayer Elementary School / Asian / N / No / 21 / 3.4%
1 / Multiracial / N / No / 14 / 2.2%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 535 / 83.9%
Y / No / 41 / 6.5%
Maddux Elementary School / Multiracial / N / No / 18 / 3.0%
2 / White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 439 / 75.8%
Y / No / 88 / 15.2%
Mercer Elementary School / Asian / N / No / 11 / 1.5%
Multiracial / N / No / 20 / 2.8%
1 / White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 568 / 76.6%
Y / No / 117 / 15.8%
Nagel Middle School / Asian / N / No / 23 / 2.1%
Hispanic / N / No / 13 / 1.1%
4 / Multiracial / N / No / 32 / 2.8%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 934 / 81.9%
Y / No / 110 / 9.6%
Summit Elementary School / Asian / N / No / 12 / 2.2%
2 / Multiracial / N / No / 21 / 3.7%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 449 / 81.7%
Y / No / 49 / 8.9%
Turpin High School / Asian / N / No / 21 / 1.8%
Hispanic / N / No / 10 / .8%
8 / Multiracial / N / No / 18 / 1.5%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 1,044 / 88.3%
Y / No / 68 / 5.8%
Wilson Elementary School / Asian / N / No / 16 / 2.5%
Multiracial / N / No / 23 / 3.4%
1 / White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 586 / 89.9%
Y / No / 13 / 2.0%
Indian Hill Elementary School / Asian / N / No / 33 / 7.5%
Multiracial / N / No / 12 / 2.7%
1 / White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 354 / 79.5%
Y / No / 16 / 3.6%
Indian Hill Middle School / Asian / N / No / 34 / 6.5%
Hispanic / N / No / 14 / 2.6%
3 / White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 427 / 82.0%
Y / No / 16 / 3.0%
Madeira Elementary School / Asian / N / No / 15 / 3.2%
Hispanic / N / No / 12 / 2.6%
6 / Multiracial / N / No / 11 / 2.4%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 379 / 81.8%
Y / No / 32 / 6.9%
Madeira High School / Asian / N / No / 12 / 2.5%
3 / White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 403 / 85.7%
Y / No / 25 / 5.3%
Mt Healthy High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 215 / 22.7%
Y / No / 432 / 45.5%
Hispanic / Y / No / 16 / 1.7%
Multiracial / N / No / 21 / 2.2%
4 / Y / No / 49 / 5.2%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 125 / 13.1%
Y / No / 79 / 8.3%
North Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 88 / 8.8%
Y / No / 562 / 56.4%
Hispanic / Y / Yes / 16 / 51.5%
1 / No / 24 / 2.4%
Multiracial / N / No / 21 / 2.1%
Y / No / 57 / 5.7%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 77 / 7.7%
Y / No / 150 / 15.1%
South Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 72 / 7.1%
Y / No / 685 / 67.6%
1 / Hispanic / Y / No / 15 / 1.5%
Multiracial / Y / No / 49 / 4.8%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 64 / 6.3%
Y / No / 109 / 10.7%
North College Hill Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 90 / 14.7%
Y / No / 342 / 55.9%
Multiracial / N / No / 15 / 2.5%
2 / Y / No / 36 / 5.8%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 54 / 8.8%
Y / No / 69 / 11.3%
Bevis Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 27 / 6.9%
Y / No / 61 / 15.8%
4 / Multiracial / Y / No / 19 / 4.9%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 121 / 31.4%
Y / No / 141 / 36.5%
Colerain Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 32 / 4.3%
Y / No / 101 / 13.5%
Multiracial / N / No / 36 / 4.8%
2 / Y / No / 38 / 5.1%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 374 / 49.7%
Y / No / 166 / 22.0%
Colerain High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 172 / 8.2%
Y / No / 277 / 13.1%
10 / Multiracial / N / No / 52 / 2.5%
Y / No / 54 / 2.6%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 1,160 / 55.1%
Y / No / 362 / 17.2%
Colerain Middle School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 50 / 8.0%
Y / No / 97 / 15.4%
Multiracial / N / No / 18 / 2.8%
1 / Y / No / 14 / 2.2%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 304 / 48.1%
Y / No / 142 / 22.4%
Monfort Heights Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 19 / 3.4%
Y / No / 30 / 5.2%
Multiracial / N / No / 11 / 2.0%
1 / Y / No / 13 / 2.3%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 322 / 56.8%
Y / No / 160 / 28.2%
Northwest High School / Asian / N / No / 11 / 1.1%
Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 142 / 13.9%
7 / Y / No / 202 / 19.7%
Multiracial / N / No / 33 / 3.3%
Y / No / 32 / 3.2%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 393 / 38.3%
Y / No / 193 / 18.9%
Pleasant Run Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 63 / 16.6%
Y / No / 113 / 30.0%
Multiracial / N / No / 17 / 4.5%
2 / Y / No / 26 / 7.0%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 107 / 28.3%
Y / No / 41 / 10.8%
Pleasant Run Middle School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 113 / 14.6%
Y / No / 179 / 23.0%
Multiracial / N / No / 22 / 2.9%
1 / Y / No / 35 / 4.5%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 212 / 27.2%
Y / No / 195 / 25.1%
Norwood High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 11 / 1.8%
Y / No / 38 / 6.2%
Hispanic / Y / No / 13 / 2.1%
2 / Multiracial / N / No / 10 / 1.6%
Y / No / 13 / 2.1%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 315 / 51.4%
Y / No / 196 / 31.9%
Norwood Middle School / Black, Non-Hispanic / Y / No / 29 / 9.6%
1 / White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 106 / 34.5%
Y / No / 154 / 50.1%
Bridgetown Middle School / Asian / N / No / 11 / 1.8%
Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 11 / 1.9%
2 / Multiracial / N / No / 11 / 1.9%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 558 / 93.8%
Delshire Elementary School / Multiracial / Y / No / 19 / 3.9%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 183 / 37.7%
Y / No / 242 / 49.8%
John Foster Dulles Elementary School / 2 / Multiracial / N / No / 16 / 2.2%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 671 / 95.0%
Oak Hills High School / Asian / N / No / 36 / 1.3%
Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 36 / 1.4%
17 / Hispanic / N / No / 18 / .7%
Multiracial / N / No / 62 / 2.3%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 2,505 / 93.8%
Rapid Run Middle School / Multiracial / N / No / 13 / 2.1%
1 / White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 582 / 94.9%
Heritage Hill Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / Y / Yes / 14 / 8.4%
No / 62 / 46.8%
3 / Hispanic / Y / Yes / 126 / 76.3%
Multiracial / Y / No / 11 / 8.3%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 11 / 8.3%
Y / No / 25 / 18.9%
Lincoln Heights Elementary School / 2 / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 20 / 8.2%
Y / No / 212 / 88.7%
Princeton Community Middle School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 164 / 15.4%
Y / No / 388 / 36.5%
Hispanic / Y / Yes / 48 / 67.4%
30 / No / 26 / 2.4%
Multiracial / N / No / 27 / 2.5%
Y / No / 31 / 2.9%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 262 / 24.6%
Y / No / 140 / 13.2%
Princeton High School / Asian / N / No / 21 / 1.4%
Y / Yes / 12 / 13.5%
No / 11 / .7%
Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 337 / 21.5%
Y / No / 562 / 35.9%
25 / Hispanic / N / No / 18 / 1.2%
Y / Yes / 43 / 48.5%
No / 34 / 2.2%
Multiracial / N / No / 34 / 2.2%
Y / No / 27 / 1.7%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 378 / 24.2%
Y / No / 141 / 9.0%
Sharonville Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 17 / 5.3%
Y / No / 80 / 25.3%
Hispanic / Y / Yes / 52 / 70.6%
3 / Multiracial / Y / No / 17 / 5.4%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 111 / 34.9%
Y / No / 75 / 23.5%
Springdale Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 93 / 24.0%
Y / No / 84 / 21.6%
Hispanic / Y / Yes / 17 / 59.2%
4 / Multiracial / N / No / 21 / 5.4%
Y / No / 15 / 4.0%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 86 / 22.2%
Y / No / 69 / 17.9%
Stewart Elementary School / Asian / N / No / 11 / 3.3%
Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 23 / 6.7%
Y / No / 22 / 6.2%
1 / Hispanic / Y / Yes / 65 / 72.6%
No / 15 / 4.3%
Multiracial / N / No / 19 / 5.5%
Y / No / 15 / 4.3%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 131 / 37.5%
Y / No / 106 / 30.2%
Woodlawn Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 36 / 20.5%
8 / Y / No / 110 / 63.1%
Multiracial / Y / No / 18 / 10.2%
Hilltop Community Elementary School / Multiracial / N / No / 11 / 2.7%
3 / Y / No / 14 / 3.4%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 282 / 68.3%
Y / No / 87 / 21.1%
Reading Community High School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 16 / 3.5%
3 / White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 303 / 66.4%
Y / No / 117 / 25.6%
St Bernard Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / Y / No / 65 / 22.9%
1 / Multiracial / Y / No / 14 / 5.0%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 65 / 23.0%
Y / No / 123 / 43.4%
Taylor High School / 1 / White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 430 / 71.6%
Y / No / 140 / 23.3%
Winton Woods Elementary School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 93 / 21.1%
Y / No / 219 / 49.7%
Hispanic / Y / Yes / 25 / 45.9%
3 / Multiracial / N / No / 30 / 6.7%
Y / No / 20 / 4.5%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 32 / 7.3%
Y / No / 38 / 8.6%
Winton Woods High School / Asian / N / No / 12 / 1.1%
Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 378 / 34.6%
Y / Yes / 11 / 29.0%
No / 402 / 36.8%
11 / Hispanic / Y / Yes / 17 / 45.0%
No / 22 / 2.1%
Multiracial / N / No / 57 / 5.2%
Y / No / 41 / 3.8%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 118 / 10.8%
Y / No / 45 / 4.1%
Winton Woods Intermediate School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 116 / 23.5%
Y / No / 237 / 47.9%
Hispanic / Y / Yes / 15 / 59.5%
6 / Multiracial / N / No / 22 / 4.4%
Y / No / 27 / 5.5%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 43 / 8.6%
Y / No / 32 / 6.4%
Winton Woods Middle School / Black, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 140 / 28.5%
Y / No / 218 / 44.3%
Hispanic / Y / No / 15 / 3.1%
5 / Multiracial / N / No / 14 / 2.8%
Y / No / 16 / 3.2%
White, Non-Hispanic / N / No / 47 / 9.5%
Y / No / 36 / 7.2%

Question: Do all candidates take the two courses identified as requiring field experiences? What about advanced candidates?