COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE1999

______

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of development of electronic commerce services over the WWW. It presents an electronic auction system as a case study of a distributed computing application using state-of-the-art technologies in WWW distributed programming. The resulting system has light requirements in computing resources and is easily adaptable to sophisticated functionality.

1.Introduction

1.1E-commerce

Electronic commerce is one of the hottest issues of WWW development. It addresses the adoption of new technologies in the service of the everyday life of consumers. Among the key issues of electronic commerce technology challenges are the standardisation of procedures and processes and the development of novel services for widespread usage by the public. The revolving central issue of commerce is the concept of a transaction and this work makes an attempt exactly at modelling auctions as transactions.

1.2What is an auction?

An auction is a special type of a commercial transaction. The basic difference between an auction and a classical transaction is that in the latter the customer offers a price for a product, which is accepted or rejected or “bargained” by the seller until both agree or until the deal is broken. In an auction a product becomes an object of competition among many customers. Consequently the auction is a more “democratic” commercial transaction, as more than one person have the opportunity to participate in the auctioning of a product on sale.

In Internet there exist some systems of electronic auctions, but these are not real time systems. Typically auctions last several days and it is at their conclusion that a bidder is informed whether he/she was successful or not.

1.3Existing auction systems

A typical electronic auction system is Bonsai[1]. In Bonsai new members are registered by filling in a special form. When a user becomes a member in the system he/she can observe an auction, participate in an auction or sell one or more products. To sell a product he/she completes a form, giving information about the product and the desirable (minimum) price. Bids are collected for a pre-specified time period, and bidders are informed about the biggest offer and the final winner. Usually an auction takes quite some time to complete. Similar systems are Jerome J. Manning & Co.:Real Estate Auctions[2], and Copart Salvage Auto Auctions[3].

These systems are not real time however. So, persons or companies who would like to participate in auctions over the WWW, but have limited time resources to do so, can not use them (in reality, some pseudo-autonomous bidding is allowed but this does not compensate for the absence of real time action). A similar problem appears with sellers, who may want their product to be sold as fast as possible (for example an airline may want to auction the remaining seats of a flight a few hours prior to departure). The lack of the above feature is a major problem of these systems and could be a factor of unreliability due to the possibility of generating suspicion that bids are maybe manipulated. The need for a real time electronic auction system is existent.

Another electronic auction system is CASS [1]. Even though, CASS is not implemented over the WWW, it is designed as a multi-location real-time electronic marketplace (currently used only in wholesale fish auctions, it provides for the connection of remote sites, such as fish auctions, buyers and sellers, using a PC via a modem or ISDN line).

1.4Motivation for real-time auctions over the WWW

Network bandwidth (or the lack of it) has always been a limiting factor in the deployment of real time applications over the WWW. However, as the information society will be increasingly dependent on the ability of its citizen to communicative efficiently on-line, the development of products and services that attempt to emulate real life situations is a necessity. Thus, a real-time auction system would exactly address the transition to an electronic consumer habit as close as possible to the conventional one.

1.5Layout of the rest of the report

The rest of the report is organised as follows:

Brief system overview: This chapter is an overview of the already implemented system. It describes some basic issues about the key technological components of the system (Java, Voyager, Applets and the WWW).

Requirements Specifications: This chapter lists the users’ requirements of an on-line electronic auction system. It also introduces a scenario of usage.

Design: This chapter describes the conceptual and logical design of the system, using standard notation (OMT), and sets out the interaction between the system objects.

2.Brief system overview

2.1Basic features

The auction system to be presented has three types of entities: buyers, sellers and auction houses. It implements a classic scenario: a seller informs an auction house about products to be sold and the auction house forwards them to a group of buyers inviting them to start making bids.

The system has the following features:

  • a communication protocol between basic processes (an auction house is informed by sellers for the products they want to sell, buyers make offers for products which are auctioned in the auction house, the auction house determines the winner of every auction and informs corresponding sellers about that).
  • a facility for recording information about auctions which have been completed, in a suitable database. All transactions, which take place in an auction, are recorded in a database, so a buyer has the opportunity to see some information on history of bids, for example. This helps a user to take right decisions about his/her next actions, because he/she can make assumptions about the buying behaviour of other users in the auction.
  • a process for the authentication of users.
  • a graphical user interface for any type of interaction with the system. There are graphical user interfaces for operations, such as the registration of a user as a buyer or a seller in an auction house, the users’ authentication with a login/password mechanism, the declaration of information for products which will be auctioned, the participation in an auction and the simple observation of an auction.

The system has a dynamics of expansion. Because of its use of the Voyager technology[4] for the development of the system, it can easily be expanded to incorporate features of artificial intelligence and total independence of the machine in which it runs. This can happen with the use of agents, which are special types of objects, which are implemented and made available by Voyager. Agents can move autonomously by embedding onto them routes between auction houses.

Using the Voyager feature of object mobility, an auction house can manage system overload situations by transferring an auction to another computer, in a manner totally transparent to its users. Also the auction house workload, which corresponds to the messages exchanged between an auction house and its customers can be reduced with the use of the feature of Space, which is provided by Voyager technology. Space is an advanced architectural feature for the reduction of messages between Voyager objects. Using the idea of Space an auction house can divide its users in domains and domain forwarders transparently inform users without the intervention of the parent process.

2.2Java & Voyager

Java [2] is a powerful programming language built to be secure, cross-platform and international. It is being continuously extended to provide language features and libraries that elegantly handle problems that are difficult in traditional programming languages, such as multithreading, database access, network programming and distributed computing. Java allows client-side programming via the applet.

For the development of the auction system we used ObjectSpace Voyager Core technology, which is a product of ObjectSpace[5]. Voyager, a simple but dynamic object request broker (ORB)[6], is developed on this technology. Voyager is used for the development of distributed applications. It is 100% Java and it follows the object-oriented model of Java. With Voyager a programmer can create remote objects easily, send them messages and move them between programs, which are located in different computers.

Except from the fact that Voyager has a set of features, which are shared by other ORBs too, it also provides mobile objects and autonomous agents. Voyager is a platform that unifies distributed programming with agent technology. Its basic philosophy is that an agent is simply a special type of object, which can move independently, continue to do operations, as it moves and acts like any other object. Voyager permits objects and agents to send Java messages to an agent even if it moves. Also it permits remote activation of any Java class, even if it belongs in a third party library, without modification of the class source. It also supports services such as transparent distributed persistence, scalable group communication and basic operations of catalogue administration.

Voyager, unlike other distributed technologies, uses the Java language as an essential interface. One of the main feature of Java is the ability of class loading in a virtual machine in run-time. This ability permits the usage of distributed objects and autonomous agents as another tool for the development of distributed systems. The addition of this ability in older distributed technologies is often impractical and leads to awkward usage of mobile objects and autonomous agents, making them clearly inferior to the transparent support of these features in Voyager.

2.3Applets

The implemented system uses applets to interact with users, either the customers or the administrator. An applet is a program that runs inside a Web browser. Because applets must be safe, they are limited in what they are allowed to do. However, they are a powerful tool in supporting client-side programming.

3.Requirements Specifications

3.1User requirements

The user requirements, for an electronic auction system, will be produced by a study of the needs, desires and experiences of users from corresponding systems, regardless of whether they are electronic or not. A set of basic user requirements is set out below.

  • Friendly user interface. The system must provide a user-friendly interface to accommodate even inexperienced users without intimidating or disappointing them.
  • Fast access to the auctions’ system. Users must access the auctions’ system as fast as possible, so as not to waste time waiting for a connection with the system. Delays may result in a user not participating in an auction and, surely, are a source of annoyance.
  • Small user involvement in system installation and operation. The user’s involvement in setting up and maintaining the system should be minimal.
  • Small cost for purchase and usage of the system. The system must be cheap to tempt users and auction houses to use it. Although the license price can be fixed ad hoc, the requirements of the system in hardware mustn’t be big or cause network overload. Both could either increase costs or delay access, resulting in potential market failure.
  • Provision of equal opportunities for participation to users. Every subscriber of the system must have the same opportunities of participation in auctions with other users. No privileges (such as early information) are to be given to any users.
  • Products interest profile. The users may complete a profile of interest for products in an auction house. The auction house may then inform them for auctions, for which they could be interested in. This gives the opportunity to an auction house to inform its users on time as well as build up a reliable database of profiles, that may be used for marketing.
  • Observation and participation in more than one auction. A user must have the opportunity to participate in all currently ongoing auctions, switching between them at will.
  • Autonomous bids. The potential of autonomous bidding should be explored. Autonomy may be either specified by an ad-hoc schedule or learned via profiling.
  • Adequate statistics information. Users should be able to keep track of an auction’s history before deciding to submit a bid.
  • Notification to users about potential auction conclusion in which they are about to win. Users should be alerted for auctions which are about to finish and in which they will be the winners, if somebody doesn’t bid for more.
  • New products update. It concerns informing users about the submission of any new item to be auctioned at the auction house.
  • Security. The system must be safe in data exchange, to avoid data perusal by malicious users or plain hackers. Also it must secure that no bid information will be lost. It is also essential that the system supports the privacy of personal information (such as credit card, and/or address details).
  • Authentication. It concerns the identification of users, in the sense that every user who participates in any auction is known to the system.

3.2Scenario of Usage

In this section we will describe the actions available to a user. Registration, which is essential for selling and buying products, is such an action. Product declaration is another action where a seller submits an item to be auctioned. Participation in an auction is another one. Finally, simple observation of the evolution of an auction is a commonplace action, which allows the user to simply observe an auction without the right to make an offer.

3.2.1Registration

Reliability in the process and the result of an auction (credibility as well) is boosted by establishing the identity of each system user.

The authentication level, that we want to attain, is a trade off between security, technical complexity and user friendliness. A simple registration form contains only a login and a password field. However, other fields such as credit card number, address, etc., can be requested. This would entail an overhead on the auctions house’s personnel to authenticate the data from external sources but would increase the trustworthiness of the system.

To allow maximum separation between classes of users, buyers and sellers will be registered separately.

3.2.2Product declaration

The seller, after registering with the auction house, may submit, at any time, information about a product that he/she would like to go up for sale, specifying the expected (minimum) price, a product description and a date by which the auction must have been completed. The auction house then informs the potential seller if the product is accepted.

The auction house updates a scheduling table of auction, according to such seller requests (this scheduling table may only be accessed and/or modified by the system administration). Potential buyers are informed about the dates of an auction kick off, which allows them ample time to decide on their participation. More than one item may be auctioned at the same time and a buyer may participate in any of these auctions.

3.2.3Participating in an auction

A buyer participates in an auction by simply accessing the WWW site of the auction house and being granted an authentication clearing by a login/password mechanism. Two types of bids are possible.

  • Manual bid: The user can make an offer for the auction he/she selects. During the auction he/she receives information about the auction, such as the number of users who participate in it and the current value of the product on sale.
  • Autonomous bid[7]: In autonomous bidding an agent (autonomous object) will be created at the user’s desktop and will travel all the way to the auction house to start bidding according to a set of user-specified rules, without (usually) any supervision.

3.2.4Observation of an auction

Users, who are not registered at an auction house, should have the opportunity to observe the progress of an auction for plain marketing reasons. The marketing message will be better received when the potential user is assured of the smooth and reliable system operation.

Potential sellers may also be interested to observe the carrying out of an auction.

3.2.5Expanding the scenarios

The operation of the system was described from the point of view of one auction house only. The descriptions set out above hold when the world consists of one auction house or when auction houses are not co-operating.

The system can be expanded in the situation that some auction houses decide to co-operate. Then, a large space of auction houses will be created, where a user with or without the help of agents could take advantage of several services made available by such an architecture of collaboration.

Among such services could be:

  • A user can specify his/her requirements for a product (product description, price) and an agent is spawned to locate an auction house, where such an item is being auctioned and bid on behalf of the user.
  • A seller could achieve less charging from an auction house for auctioning his/her product, as he/she could select among a variety of auction houses.
  • Auction houses also stand to reap benefits from such a co-operation. A larger audience (of potential users) will be addressed. This happens because a user of an auction house could be automatically a user of another auction house too.
  • An auction house could delegate some of its functionality to a competitor/collaborator should it not be available for a variety of reasons (e.g. system maintenance). This would work much like the airline industry where competitor company jets are hired to tackle extraordinary situations (strikes, increased demand etc.)

The system to be presented in this paper would need quite some technical enhancements regarding functionality to achieve such a co-operation platform, but due to the technologies it adopts this would entail minor changes in the conceptual design.

4.Design

4.1Conceptual Design

Figure 1 details the system design in OMT[8] notation.

Figure 1: Conceptual design.

The main object of the system is the AuctionHouse. All the other objects hook on it at some point in their lifetime. Its job is mainly to create and to synchronise the other objects. The attributes of this object are its name and its IP address. The object can initialise and terminate an auction and inform a seller about the acceptance of a product[9].