US LHC ACELLERATOR PROJECT
brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley
TAN/TAS ABSORBER FABRICATION
Product Acceptance Plan
Version 1.0
TAN/TAS ABSORBER FABRICATION / Version: 1.0Product Acceptance Plan / Date: 01/NOV/00
LBL_TAN-TAS_AcceptancePlan.doc
Revision History
Date / Version / Description / Author01/NOV/00 / 1.0 / Initial Release / Bill Elliott
Table of Contents
1.Introduction
1.1Purpose
1.2Scope
1.3Definitions, Acronyms and Abbreviations
1.4References
1.5Overview
2.Responsibilities
3.Product Acceptance Tasks
3.1Product Acceptance Criteria
3.2Physical Configuration Audit
3.3Functional Configuration Audit
3.4Schedule
4.Resource Requirements
4.1Hardware Requirements
4.3Documentation requirements
4.4Personnel Requirements
4.5Test Data Requirements
4.6Other Requirements
5.Problem Resolution and Corrective Action
8.Tools, Techniques and Methodologies
Product Acceptance Plan
Introduction
[The introduction of the Product Acceptance Plan should provide an overview of the entire document. It should include the purpose, scope, definitions, acronyms, abbreviations, references, and overview of this Product Acceptance Plan.]
Purpose
This plan gives the product acceptance plan, criteria, and metodology to achieve the plan
for the TAN/TAS fabrication at LBNL and describes how the requirements will be met.
Scope
This plan provides requirements applicable to the TAN/TAS production at LBNL for the US LHC Accelerator Project. It will cover fabrication of individual parts as well as full system assembly and checkout
Definitions, Acronyms and Abbreviations
LHC Large Hadron Collider
LBNLLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
TANIR Neutral Absorber
TASIR Quad Absorber
References
Fabrication Plan/ Schedule
TAN Functional Specification
TAN Interface Specification
TAS Functional Specification
TAS Interface Specification
Overview
Responsibilities
The organization responsible for the Product Acceptance Plan will be the Lead Engineer and the Project Lead.
Product Acceptance Tasks
1.1.Product Acceptance Criteria
TAN: Defined in Appendix A
TAS: Defined in Appendix B
Physical Configuration Audit
4 TAN UNITS
2 TAS ATLAS UNITS
2TAS CMS UNITS
Functional Configuration Audit
For each TAN/TAS unit, identify the evaluation method(s) and the level of detail that will be used to determine if it meets the product acceptance criteria.
This will become the Component Test Plan
Schedule
Schedule tie-in indicating the start and end times for each of the product acceptance tasks, including preparation and set-up activities.
Resource Requirements
Hardware Requirements
Documentation requirements
Personnel Requirements
Test Data Requirements
Other Requirements
Problem Resolution and Corrective Action
Problems identified will be controlled, the cause determined, and the problem corrected
1. Handling of non-conforming parts
Deviation and/or Waiver
If a part is found to be out of spec or a vendor requests a waiver for an out of tolerance part:
1. Convene a committee consisting of the Engineering Lead and the Project Lead
Determine if the deviation affects the Acceptance Plan
a. No effect:
Accept
Reject
Rework based on time and expense
b. Effect:
Reject
Petition CERN with a ECR to change to the Acceptance Plan. Accept, reject or rework based on the results of the ECR.