archived as
read more from Richard Crandall at
note: because important web-sites are frequently "here today but gone tomorrow", the following was archived from on June 17, 2003 . This is NOT an attempt to divert readers from the aforementioned website. Indeed, the reader should only read this back-up copy if the updated original cannot be found at the original author's site.
INTRODUCTION
by Richard Crandall
What follows is a set of (highly mathematical) papers I created in early to mid year 2000 to determine -- by the known laws of Physics -- just how a craft could harness gravity to propel itself. My discoveries and conclusions are interesting & compelling.
Here, briefly, are some of my conclusions:
(1) Propulsion by emission of electromagnetic waves is theoretically possible, but probably could not be useful in practice except possibly deep in space where it only takes a very small force to accelerate a craft.
(2) Propulsion by emission of weak gravity waves -- as generated by parallel mass-flow tubes -- while theoretically possible, really could not be done in practice.
(3) There are really 3 types of Gravity. Gravity 'A' is just the normal static gravity we are all familiar with. Gravity 'B' is a type of gravity felt only as a result of motion and is analogous to a magnetic field, whereas Gravity 'A' is analogous to an electrostatic field. Hence, Gravity 'B' is sometimes referred to as the "gravito-magnetic" or "Gravimagnetic" field. Gravity 'C' is a really weird type of gravity force felt as a result of motion also. But it results from mixed contributions of velocity components.
(5) If my hypothesis about the electron (and indeed all subatomic particles) is correct, then a gravity-wave propulsion system could be built in practice and would be very effective. It would consist of opposing circular coils (i.e., they lie in parallel planes, but not in the same plane) of high-frequency electrical current (out-of-phase by 90 degrees), such that the each coil is wrapped around a cylindrical piece of suitable material. The material must be one which the electron spins and orbits can be easily aligned by the high-frequency field produced by the coils. An alternative would be to drive the two coaxial cylinders of material by separate microwave horn sources, where the two sources are 90 degrees out -of-phase. Gravity wave propulsion is then a distinct reality.
For the official record, I am claiming I have invented all of this (the nature of the electron as well as the co-axial material rods driven by coils or microwaves) on June 1st, 2000. Consider that I have a patent pending on the coaxial rods gravity wave and propulsion system. And consider that all of the material on this website is copyrighted 1999, 2000, and 2001. The formulas and concepts for the various manifestations of gravity -- which show that Einstein's gravity formulas can be reduced down to formulas analogous to Maxwell's Equations -- were all developed independently by me without any knowledge at that time (of the development) that others had derived similar formulas. Also, I have to-date not looked at any such formulas derived by others, and have thus not compared my ideas to those mathematical formulations of others.
if on the Internet, press <BACK> on your browser to return to the previous page (or go to
else if accessing these files from the CD in a MS-Word session, simply <CLOSE> this file's window-session; the previous window-session should still remain 'active'
1