1

Film Analysis WorksheetName:

I. Pre-viewing Instructions

Prior to watching the film, read through the information and questions on this handout. If you do not understand the social/cultural/or economic context of a question, do a bit of research in order to better prepare for the film. Also, read through the Essay III instructions and make sure you understand the purpose of the assignment. That way as you watch the film, you’ll have a better idea of the things you should be looking for and thinking about.

Title of Film:Date Released:

Director:Producer:

Pre-Viewing Question: What do you think you will see in this film? List three concepts, ideas, or topics that you might expect to see based on the title of the film and what we discussed in class. Comment on your interest in the film and its topics.

______

II.Viewing Instructions

You are viewing this film in order to eventually compose a critical analysis of it; therefore, as you watch it, you’ll want to take notes about the physical qualities and the content/themes of the film. As you do this, think about how you are judging the film in relation to these things. You’ll also want to take organized notes about the structure/scenes/events in the film so that you are able to make accurate references to the film in your essay.

______

Technical Elements/Form

As you view Craigslist Joe, describe the applicable physical qualities of the film. Often times it is important to refer to these physical qualities in order to analyze specific examples and support your evaluation (the more detailed, the better). You don’t need complete sentences, but you should be doing this while you watch the film. Feel free to add anything not listed that you consider important so that you don’t forget it later.

Narration/voice over

Music/Background noise/Special effects

Interviews and/or Conversations (whom/why?)

Graphs/Maps/Pictures/Graphics

Mood or tone/emotions evoked:

How camera angles, lighting, music, narration, and/or editing contribute to creating an atmosphere:

Content/Theme/Purpose

When we evaluate a social experiment documentary likeCraigslist Joe, we often judge its quality by examining howwell the film does (ordoes not do) the following:

  • fairly and thoroughly explore the topic
  • fully and accurately devise a social experiment that yields valid, unbiased conclusions--an experiment that is feasible/that mirrors real life
  • shed light on something that is often overlooked
  • creatively approach a problem/situation/phenomenon
  • increase public awareness by bringing light to issues and stories that may have otherwise been unknown or not often thought about (its educational value)
  • connect with the rhetorical situation (the social, cultural, and economic conversations around us)
  • encourage individual thought
  • encourage public engagement
  • reflect personal narratives in a way that connect with broader social movements, problems, and change

Below is a list of questions that focus on 4 different topics developed in the film. While you watch the film, comment on as many of these critical thinking brainstorming questions as you can.Add more feedback after you view the film. It is by thinking about these questions (and about the ones that may emerge) that you will begin to formulate a direction for your essay.

1. The film is interested in exploring thepositive potential of social mediaas a vehicle for bringing people together and fostering communication and connection. Does this reflect our current understanding of the issue? How well and to what extent does the film explore this potential? Does Garner's film offer valid conclusions about this "good" role of social media? What aspects of this issue does the film overlook? Can we make claims about social media based on Craigslist?

2. Another direction would be to evaluate to what extent the film depicts asocial experiment.Is Garner's experiment as open-ended as it seems? Are his experiences universal? What factors may have skewed the conclusions? Would there be other issues to explore if the test subject (Garner) was someone else? If his experience wasn't universal, then what are we to make of the film's conclusions? Does Garner accurately represent the type of person in need of charity? Does this representation even matter?

3. The film is also focused on exploring thegenerosity and goodwill of the American people. Does the film adequately explore this topic? Would you say that the people Garner meets serve as a diverse enough sample of America? Or can we not make a conclusion about American goodwill andgenerosity based on a sample of Craigslist users? Do these people (active Craigslist users) represent the typical American?

4. The film also touches on our growing reliance onthe shared economy.You might choose to explore how or to what extent the film does or does not explore such realities and experiences.

5. Based on the list of suggested evaluation guidelines (see the bottom of page 2) and your initial response to the film, what other topics/ideas/issues does this film develop? How else might you evaluate this film?

______

III. Post-viewing

1. What is the principal subject of this documentary? What is its principal purpose? Does it argue for a position? Does it critique a position? Does it offer an evaluation of some sort? What kind of impact does it seek to achieve with—and upon—its intended audience? Does it achieve this goal? Why or why not?

2. Does this documentary film make specific choices about what material is to be recorded in relation to the direct observation by the camera operator/director? If so, what kinds of choices, of what should be included and what not, and what kinds of images should be emphasized and what de-emphasized? What, in short, does the documentary film maker look at, and encourage us to look at - and to see - as most important about the principal subject of his or her film?

3. Does this documentary film include directly solicited observation, information, reflection, or commentary by witnesses, experts, and other participants in relation to the documentary subject? What kinds of witnesses, experts, and/or other participants does the film maker find most useful, how does she or he use them to get the film's chief points across, and what kind of response does the film maker seek to evoke by using these subjects as she or he does?

4. What are the film’s strengths? Why are these strengths? Are there any specific scenes that stand out as particularly significant and moving?

5. What are its weaknesses? Why are these weaknesses? What is left unanswered? What could be improved upon? Identify specific scenes/examples/etc.

6. How would you evaluate the effectiveness of this documentary film? Describe possible directions for your essay and for your evaluation thesis statement. What criteria do you think are most important in the evaluation of this film?