(Experiential Analysis Paper)This paper is due in Week 4. After visiting and observing a chosen, instructor-approved health care setting, a summary will be written to include:

  • A report on how consumers (e.g., patients, clients, residents, etc.) would experience the setting.
  • An analysis of the kinds of organizational changes that could improve the consumers’ experience in this setting.
  • The paper should be no more than 3-5 pages in length. Format must be inAPA (refer to Doc Sharing, and Webliography for writing format guidelines).
  • Be sure to include references when citing others’ work or other sources used in preparing the analysis (refer to course syllabus for citation guidelines).

Constructive Feedback Experiential Analysis Paper Rubric: 120 Total Points

CONTENT (70%) 84 max- 76 = A; 75-67 = B; 66-59 = C; 58-50 = D; 49 – less = F. / ORGANIZATION (10%) 12max- 10 = A; 9—8 = B; 7.7-7 = C; 6.9-6.6 = D; less than 6.5 = F / WRITING STYLE (5%) 6-5.4 = A; 5.3--4.3 = B; / MECHANICS / APA (15%) 16- 14.6 = A; 14.5- 12.8 = B; 12.7- 11.2 C; 11.1- 9.6 = D;
A
108 -120 pts / Includes an introduction and conclusion. Presents an analysis founded upon an understanding of the managed care organizational models, identify organizational structure and the consumer experience. Presents an analysis of the kinds of organizational changes that could improve the consumers’ experience in this setting. Develops main points clearly. Includes three or more references which support the need for change and change model effectiveness. Meets assignment length requirement of 3-5 pages. / Information flows logically from one idea to the next with clear and smooth transitions
Transitions found between and within sections must be clear and effective. / Appropriate to the assignment, fresh (interesting to read), accurate (no far-fetched, unsupported comments), precise (say what you mean), and concise (not wordy). / Analysis is free of serious errors. Ideas are clearly expressed; only a one or two minor spelling, punctuation, and/or sentence structure errors that do not interfere with the readability of the paper.
B
96 -107
pts / Includes a good introduction and conclusion but that need some revision.Presents an analysis founded upon an understanding of the managed care organizational models, did not clearly identify organizational structure, did present the consumer experience. Presents an analysis of the kinds of organizational changes that could improve the consumers’ experience in this setting. Did not fully develop main points clearly. Includes less than three references which support the need for change and change model effectiveness. Meets assignment length requirement of 3-5 pages. / Information flows with relative coherence from one idea to the next. Each section has good internal organization. Transitions found between and within sections are mostly clear and effective. / Should generally be appropriate to the assignment, accurate (no far-fetched, unsupported comments), precise (say what you mean), and concise (not wordy). / Contains some generally minor grammatical and punctuation errors.Few misspellings. minor punctuation, and/or sentence structure errors that do not significantly interfere with the readability of the submission
C
95 – 84 pts / The introduction and/or conclusion do not set up or close the paper very effectively. Shows too little original thought. The paper is largely informative with little analysis. The organizational change presented is not clear. Main point weakly presented. Includes less than three references which supports the need for change and change model effectiveness. Does not meet the assignment length of 3-5 pages. / The organization has a few problems. Sections lack transitions, and several sentences may be monotonous or confusing. The overall structure of the assignment is not effective. / Appropriate in places, but elsewhere language is vague and/or inappropriate. / Numerous grammatical and punctuation errors. Misspellings are more frequent, but they are the sort spell checkers do not catch, such as "effect/affect." Connections generally made from one idea to the next; unclear transitions
D
72 -83 pts / The introduction or conclusion is poorly developed. The analysis main points are developed inconsistently, or repetitiously and none, or almost no, connection made from one idea to the next.The analysis lacks an understanding of the managed care organizational models, and or failed to identify organizational structure and the consumer experience. Presents an analysis of the kinds of organizational changes that could improve the consumers’ experience in this setting. Main points poorly developed or absent. Lacks references which support the need for change and change model effectiveness. Does not meet required length. / The paper’s organization has multiple problems. Most sections lack transitions, and sentences are often monotonous or incomprehensible. The overall structure of the assignment is not effective. / Inappropriate and vague writing interferes with the development and clarity of the main points. / Many serious and minor grammar or punctuation errors; frequent misspellings, including those that should have been caught by the spell-checker.
F
71 – 0 pts / Inappropriate analysis and no change model suggested.
Plagiarized work: (Definitions and information copied from websites or other sources without quotation marks and proper citation)
No Project Submitted