EXPANDING MEDICAID IN MISSOURI: CONSIDER THE SAVINGS

Missouri has a unique opportunity to improve the health of its residents and achieve state savings. Expanding Medicaid will provide health care coverage to nearly 260,000 currently uninsured low-income adults in 2014, increasing to over 300,000 over time. However, the Medicaid expansion will also generate substantial savings for the State. In fact, the combination of new tax revenue generated by the new federal funds and general revenue savings will exceed the cost of covering newly eligible individuals by $587 million from 2014-2021, an average of $73 million per year.[1]

  • Expanding Medicaid will generate over $452 million in new tax revenue.[2] A University of Missouri study estimates even greater savings in state andlocal tax revenues.[3]
  • Expanding Medicaid will save the State $203 million by covering the cost of services for the uninsured which are currently paid for exclusively with state dollars, such as mental health services, services for the blind, and in-patient hospital costs for Missouri prisoners.[4]
  • The Medicaid expansion will save the State $704 million by moving some individuals from current Medicaid programs (such as Medicaid spenddown) with a lower match rate to the new expansion eligibility group, which is funded at a significantly higher match rate. Missouri’s current Medicaid program is generally funded at a 61% matching rate while the new expansion group (for individuals at or below 138% of poverty) will be funded at arate of 100% in the first three years, gradually being reduced to 90% over time.[5]
  • Almost half of Missouri’s share of the cost of the Medicaid expansion will not be paid for with state general revenue dollars.[6] Missouri uses provider taxes and other funding streams to provide a significant portion of the state match for its Medicaid program. These “taxes” are paid by certain providers (e.g., hospitals, pharmacists, and nursing homes)to draw down federal Medicaid matching funds.
  • Other states also estimate savings from the ACA’s Medicaid expansion. The state of Arkansas determined that the receipt of new federal health care dollars under the ACA would increase state revenue by $254 million, and that the Medicaid expansion would save the state$372 million overall from 2014-2021.[7] The states of Maryland and Idaho have made similar determinations.[8] Moreover, an independent study showed that Florida would likely save $100 million a year under the Medicaid expansion, after the federal match is reduced to 90%.[9]

From a fiscal perspective, there is no question that Missouri should expand Medicaid. The “net” State savings increase annually until 2017, and then gradually decline until 2020, after which the federal match for newly-eligible enrollees holds steady at 90%. Even after the federal match is reduced to 90%, the combination of new tax revenue (generated by the new federal funds) and general revenue savings will still exceed the cost of covering newly eligible individuals in Missouri.[10] The bottom line is that expanding Medicaid will generate significant savings for the State. Missourimust act now to realize the full economic benefits of three years of 100% federal funding.

[1]Medicaid Expansion Draft: Impact on New Eligibles, provided by Linda Luebbering, Budget Director, December 18, 2012. From 2014-2021, the State of Missouri estimates that the combination of new general revenue generated by the new federal funds and savings to general revenue exceeds the cost of expanding Medicaid by $586.7 Million.

[2]Id. From 2014-2021 the State of Missouri estimates new tax revenue from Individual Income Tax ($242 Million), Sales Tax ($34 Million), Miscellaneous Sales Tax ($16 Million), and “Avoided Tax Credits “ ($160 Million) from the elimination of Missouri’s Health Insurance Pool (HIP) for high risk individuals, which will no longer be needed as people receive coverage under the ACA. Medicaid Expansion—Budget Key Assumptions, provided by Linda Luebbering, Budget Director, December 13, 2012. Companies now receive a tax credit for their contributions to the HIP. When the HIP is eliminated, those tax credits will be eliminated as well. These numbers are rounded for purposes of simplification.

[3]That study estimates $856 million in additional state and local tax revenue from 2014 to 2020. University of Missouri School of Medicine Department of Health Management and Informatics and Dobson DaVanzo & Associates, The Economic Impacts of Medicaid Expansion on Missouri, Missouri Hospital Association and Missouri Foundation for Health, at 14, November 2012.

[4]See Note 1.From 2014-2021 the State estimates savings from the “Blind Pension” program ($10 Million), Corrections ($23 million), and Department of Mental Health ($169 Million). These numbers are rounded down here for purposes of simplification. The estimated savings to the Department of Corrections will occur because Medicaid will cover the in-patient hospital stays of prisoners whose hospitalizations are currently paid for solely with state funds.

[5]See Note 1. From 2014-2021 the State of Missouri estimates savings from moving recipients from the following programs to the new Medicaid expansion eligibility group: Pregnant Women ($383 Million), Ticket to Work Program ($11 Million), Breast/Cervical Cancer ($57 Million), Spenddown ($245 Million), and Women’s Health Services ($9 Million). These numbers are rounded for purposes of simplification.

[6]See Note 1. The State estimates that 45% of the limited state match needed for the expansion would come from provider taxes and other funding streams besides general revenue. This figure is based upon estimates provided by State Budget Director, Linda Luebbering, that Provider Taxes and other non-general revenue funding streams will fund ($359 Million) of the State’s Share of Medicaid expansion ($806 Million).

[7] State of Arkansas, Estimated Medicaid-Related Impact of the Affordable Care Act with Medicaid Expansion, July 17, 2012, available at

[8] Charles Milligan, Expanding Medicaid: The Smart Decision for Maryland, Health Affairs Blog, August 29, 2012, available at January Angeles, Idaho Shows Why Medicaid Expansion Is a Good Deal for States, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities Blog, November 15, 2012, available at .

[9]Joan Alker et al., Florida's Medicaid Choice: Understanding Implications of Supreme Court Ruling on Affordable Health Care Act, Health Policy Institute, Georgetown University, at 7, November 2012.

[10] See Note 1.