Assessment Chart – Grade 12UReading Connections JournalNAME: ______/ 70/ 100%
Element / Level 0 – F0-49% / Level 1 – D
50-59% / Level 2 – C
60-69% / Level 3 – B
70-79% / Level 4 – A
80-100%
Knowledge and Understanding
- Text-to-Text (at least 2)
 - Demonstration of understanding of material
 - Making connections
 - Text-to-World (at least 2)
 - Demonstration of understanding of material
 - Making connections
 - Text-to-Other-Texts (at least 2)
 - Demonstration of understanding of material
 - Making connections
 
- Very little demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-text section; very few to no connections made
 - Very little demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-world section; very few to no connections made
 - Very little demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-other-texts section; very few to no connections made
 
- Little demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-text section; few connections made
 - Little demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-world section; few connections made
 - Little demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-other-texts section; few connections made
 
- Some demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-text section; some connections made
 - Some demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-world section; some connections made
 - Some demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-other-texts section; some connections made
 
- Good demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-text section; good connections made
 - Good demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-world section; good connections made
 
- Good demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-other-texts section; good connections made
 
- Excellent demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-text section; excellent connections made
 - Excellent demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-world section; excellent connections made
 - Excellent demonstration of understanding of material in text-to-other-texts section; excellent connections made
 
(0-20)
/ (0-9) / (10-11) / (12-13) / (14-15) / (16-20)Thinking and Inquiry
- Text-to-Text (at least 2)
 - Analysis
 - Interpretation
 - Creativity
 - Level of detail
 - Text-to-Self (at least 2)
 - Analysis
 - Interpretation
 - Creativity
 - Level of detail
 
- Very little analysis in text-to-text section; very little interpretation; very little to no creativity displayed; very weak level of detail achieved
 - Very little analysis in text-to-self section; very little interpretation; very little to no creativity displayed; very weak level of detail achieved
 
- Limited analysis in text-to-text section; limited interpretation; limited creativity displayed; limited level of detail achieved
 - Limited analysis in text-to-self section; limited interpretation; limited creativity displayed; limited level of detail achieved
 
- Some analysis in text-to-text section; some interpretation; some creativity displayed; some level of detail achieved
 - Some analysis in text-to-self section; some interpretation; some creativity displayed; some level of detail achieved
 
- Good analysis in text-to-text section; good interpretation; good creativity displayed; a good level of detail achieved
 - Good analysis in text-to-self section; good interpretation; good creativity displayed; a good level of detail achieved
 
- Excellent analysis in text-to-text section; excellent interpretation; superior creativity displayed; a very strong level of detail achieved
 - Excellent analysis in text-to-self section; excellent interpretation; superior creativity displayed; a very strong level of detail achieved
 
(0-20)
/ (0-9) / (10-11) / (12-13) / (14-15) / (16-20)Communication
- Spelling, grammar, punctuation
 - Editing
 - Formal writing skills
 - No slang
 - No short forms
 - No contractions
 - No informalities
 - Quotation use
 
- Far too many spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors
 - Very little to no evidence of editing
 
- No formal qualities (too much informal language)
 - Quotations not used at all
 
- Quite a few spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors
 - Little evidence of editing
 
- Very few formal qualities (a good deal of informal language)
 - Very few quotations used and/or formatted very poorly
 
- A distracting number of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors
 - Some evidence of editing
 
- Some formal qualities (some informal language)
 - Some quotations used and/or formatted with some errors
 
- A reasonable number of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors
 - Reasonably well edited
 - Writing acceptably formal (little informal language)
 - A good number of quotations used and/or formatted well
 
- Negligible spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors
 - Very well edited
 - Strong formal writing skills (very little to no informal language)
 - A large number of quotations used and/or formatted meticulously well
 
(0-20)
/ (0-9) / (10-11) / (12-13) / (14-15) / (16-20)Application
- Organization of journal
 - Entries grouped logically
 - Use of organizational materials (binder, duotang, indexes, dividers, et cetera)
 - Formatting issues
 - All entries have all elements (entry type, date, work, page refs)
 - Quota issues (10 entries min.; 2 of each type)
 
- Very little to no demonstration of organizational skills
 - Very little to no regard for formatting issues; many elements missing
 - Missing a significant number of entries; not even close to complete
 
- Little demonstration of organizational skills
 - Little regard for formatting issues; some elements missing
 - Missing more than a few entries and/or serious issues with the “two of each type” rule
 
- Some demonstration of organizational skills
 - Some regard for formatting issues; few elements missing
 - Maybe one or two entries missing and/or minor issues with the “two of each type” rule
 
- Good demonstration of organizational skills
 - Formatting issues respected; no elements missing
 - All entries present; quotas respected
 
- Excellent demonstration of organizational skills
 - Excellent attention to formatting issues
 - Quotas exceeded; student has additional entries over minimum number
 
(0-10) / (0-4.5) / (5-5.5) / (6-6.5) / (7-7.5) / (8-10)
