Summary of Canonical Discriminant Functions

Summary of Canonical Discriminant Functions

Eigenvalues /
Function / Eigenvalue / % of Variance / Cumulative % / Canonical Correlation /
1 / .505a / 91.7 / 91.7 / .579 /
2 / .046a / 8.3 / 100.0 / .209 /
a. First 2 canonical discriminant functions were used in the analysis.
Wilks' Lambda /
Test of Function(s) / Wilks' Lambda / Chi-square / df / Sig. /
1 through 2 / .636 / 292.999 / 8 / .000 /
2 / .956 / 28.890 / 3 / .000
Standardized Canonical Discriminant Function Coefficients /
/ Function /
1 / 2 /
heart palpitations / -.335 / -.823 /
withdrawal / .256 / 1.336 /
shortness of breath / .079 / .250 /
chest pain / .957 / -.549
Structure Matrix /
/ Function /
1 / 2 /
chest pain / .972* / -.181 /
shortness of breath / .552* / .170 /
heart palpitations / .279* / .026 /
withdrawal / .468 / .658* /
Pooled within-groups correlations between discriminating variables and standardized canonical discriminant functions
Variables ordered by absolute size of correlation within function. /
*. Largest absolute correlation between each variable and any discriminant function
Functions at Group Centroids /
country / Function /
1 / 2 /
1 USA / -.806 / -.325 /
2 Egypt / .814 / -.043 /
3 Brazil / -.474 / .246 /
Unstandardized canonical discriminant functions evaluated at group means
Classification Resultsa /
/ country / Predicted Group Membership / Total /
/ 1 USA / 2 Egypt / 3 Brazil /
Original / Count / 1 USA / 76 / 25 / 40 / 141 /
2 Egypt / 37 / 199 / 40 / 276 /
3 Brazil / 81 / 56 / 97 / 234 /
% / 1 USA / 53.9 / 17.7 / 28.4 / 100.0 /
2 Egypt / 13.4 / 72.1 / 14.5 / 100.0 /
3 Brazil / 34.6 / 23.9 / 41.5 / 100.0 /
a. 57.1% of original grouped cases correctly classified.