Digital Presentation Rubric

Name: Grade:

Title:

Needs improvement / Acceptable / Superior
Length:Significantly over or under the time requirement of 2 to 5 minutes. / Very close to the time requirement of 2 to 5 minutes. (Less than 15 seconds’ difference.) / Exactly within the time length requirement of 2 to 5 minutes with no obvious filler.
Topic:The information was off topic, unclear, or incomplete. / The information was on topic, interesting, and complete. / The information was tightly focused, was engaging, and had good details.
Images:Images were absent, insufficient, unrelated, or of poor quality. / Images were present, sufficient, related, and of good quality. / Images added significantly to the presentation and dovetailed perfectly. Quality was outstanding.
Text:No intro frame with name, class, and title. Text was absent or overabundant, hard to read, grammatically problematic, or unrelated. / Intro frame complete. Text was present, readable. Grammar was limited to a single error (perhaps a few examples of it). The text was related. There was sufficient. / Great intro frame- name, class, title. Text was engaging, relevant, visually appealing, grammatically correct, outstanding,and it added to the presentation.
Audio:Audio was distracting.Audio was minimal, hard to hear, or changed volume. Audio had multiple tracks in competition. / Audio was appropriate and sufficient, could be heard, and had reasonable volume control. Tracks (if present) were relevant and adequately differentiated. / Audio was enhancing. It added to the presentation in quality and style. Excellent use of supplemental audio (music or sound clips) in creative ways.
Video:Video was poorly presented, production quality was poor, significant editing was omitted. / Video was reasonably well presented, with adequate production quality and reasonable editing. / Video had creative presentation, strong production quality, and excellent editing.
Rhetorical constraints: Issues of accessibility.Aspects of presentation were inappropriate for context, subject, audience, rhetor, and/or purpose. / Video was accessible. Digital presentation was adequate for and a clear context, subject, audience, rhetor, and purpose. / Video was easily accessible. Digital presentation exceeded expectations for context, subject, audience, rhetor, and purpose.
Documentation: On-screen URL list missing. Bibliography missing. Minimal to no written script. / On-screen URL lists present. Bibliography acceptable. Written script sufficient. / On-screen URL lists clear, detailed. Bibliography correct in citation style. Excellent written script.