31 May 2016

Mid-term report

for the CORE Organic Plus funded project

“Title and acronym”

Period covered:

[Note to coordinators: this report covers the first half of the project]

Index

1. Consortium

2. Summary

2.1Mid-term project summary suitable for web publication

3.Main results, conclusions and fulfilment of objectives

4.Milestones and deliverables status

5.Publications and dissemination activities

5.1List extracted from Organic Eprints

5.2Additional dissemination activities

5.3Further possible actions for dissemination

5.4 Specific questions regarding dissemination and publications

6.Added value of the transnational cooperation in relation to the subject

Annex 1: Cost overview and deviations from budget

Annex2:Recommendations to the CORE Organic consortium in relation to launching and monitoring of future transnationally funded research projects

1. Consortium

Project acronym: / Project ID:
Project title:
Project website:
Start of project: / End of project:
Duration in months:
Details of the coordinator
Name: / First name:
Telephone: / E-mail address:
Institution: / Country
Partner no.: / Country: / Institution/ organisation name: / Type of institution/ organisation1): / Functions2): / Involved in WPs: / Contact person with e-mail address:

1)University, Public research centre, Private research centre, Company, Other

2)PC = Project coordinator, WPL = Work package leader, WPCL = Work package co-leader, P = Participant

2. Summary

2.1Mid-term project summary suitable for web publication

(Please focus on results and conclusions, preferably in bullet points, max. 1 page– font size 11)

2.2Short process update of the whole project

(Explain if the project achieved its objectives and if not, what was not performed, why, what happened, etc. Max. 1/2 page – font size 11)

3.Main results, conclusions and fulfilment of objectives

3.1WP1

WP1 / Title of WP1
WP leader:
Responsible partners:
Overall summary of main results, discussion and conclusions WP1
(max 1/2 page per WP, font size 11)
Report on the results obtained (A), changes to the original plan/ WP aims (B) and fulfilment of objectives (C)
(max 2 page per WP, font size 11)
A- results obtained:
B- comments on deviations from the original plan:
C- fulfilment of objectives:

Copy table above for each WP

4.Milestones and deliverables status

Deliverable No. / Deliverable name / Link to the document / Planned delivery month1) / Actual delivery month1) / Reasons for changes/delay and explanation of consequences
D1.1.
Milestone No. / Milestone name / Planned delivery month1) / Actual delivery month1) / Reasons for changes/delay and explanation of consequences
M1.1.

1) Measured in months from the project start date (month 1)

Additional comments (in case of major changes or deviation from the original list)

5.Publications and dissemination activities

5.1List extracted from Organic Eprints

(Publications affiliated to European Union > CORE Organic II > “project acronym”, grouped by Eprint type, with date of extraction

The list can have these headers:

Publications that are not allowed as open access should be deposited as “Visible to: Depositor and staff only”. The funding bodies and project evaluators will be granted access to these during the evaluation.Guidance on the use of Organic Eprints can be found here: a screenshot manual:

5.2Additional dissemination activities

(List dissemination activities which are not uploaded to Organic Eprints)

5.3Further possible actions for dissemination

List publications/deliverables arising from your project that Funding Bodies could consider disseminating

Indicate publications/deliverables that could usefully be translated (if this has not been done, and indicate target language)

5.4Specific questions regarding dissemination and publications

Is the project website up-to-date?

List the categories of end-users/main users of the research results and how they have been addressed/will be addressed by dissemination activities

Impact of the project in relation to main beneficiaries of the project results

(Note: for the different categories of end-users/main users of the research results, explain how well the project has been able to reach these target groups, and any known impact)

6.Added value of the transnational cooperation in relation to the subject

(max 1 page, please describe the main advantages of the transnational research cooperation compared to a national research project approach in regard to the subject of the project. You may in particular expand on new research ideas raised by the project, research cooperation established during the project, research funding obtained etc.)

Annex1: Cost overview and deviations from budget

Partner no. / Total person months / Spent person months / Total budget / Spent budget
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
TOTAL

Reasons for changes/delay and explanation of consequences:

Annex2:Recommendations to the CORE Organic consortium in relation to launching and monitoring of future transnationally funded research projects