Lockport Area Special Education Cooperative

Performance Evaluation Report

Special Education Teacher

NAME: SCHOOL:

ASSIGNMENT: ______STATUS/YEAR:

EVALUATOR:

EVALUATION SEQUENCE: Pre-Evaluation Visitation Date ______

Performance Observation Date ______

Length of Visit

Post Observation Conference Date – Evaluation Completed ______

ANECDOTAL RECORD OF OBSERVED LESSON:

SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Four Domains of Teaching with 23 components and 79 Elements

Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
a. Demonstrating Knowledge of Content b. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students c. Selecting IEP Goals
d. Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources e. Designing Coherent Instruction
f. Assessing Student Learning / Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
a. Creating an Environment of Respect and
Rapport
b. Establishing a Culture for Learning c. Managing Classroom Procedures
d. Managing Student Behavior e. Organizing Physical Space
Domain 3: Instruction
a. Communicating Clearly and Accurately
b. Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques c. Engaging Students in Learning
d. Providing Feedback to Students
e. Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness f. Using Student Assessment Data / Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities
a. Reflecting on Teaching
b. Maintaining Accurate Records
c. Communicating with Families and Staff d. Contributing to the School and District
e. Growing and Developing Professionally f. Showing Professionalism

LOCKPORT AREA SPECIAL EDUCATION COOPERATIVE

SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER’S YEARLY GOAL SHEET

Name: Date: School: Grade Level/Subject Area:

Please set 1-3 goals ONLY in the targeted Domains

DOMAIN: / SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER’S GOAL(S) STATED IN TERMS OF PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES (1-3 PER DOMAIN)
Targeted
Components: / STRATEGIES: What will the Special
Education Teacher do to achieve goal(s)? / Sources of Data/Proof/Evidence:
DOMAIN: / SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER’S GOAL(S) STATED IN TERMS OF PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES (1-3 PER DOMAIN)
Targeted
Components: / STRATEGIES: What will the Special
Education Teacher do to achieve goal(s)? / Sources of Data/Proof/Evidence:

From: Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching” by Charlotte Danielson, ASCD Publications, 1996

3

LOCKPORT AREA SPECIAL EDUCATION COOPERATIVE

SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER’S PRE-OBSERVATION PLANNING RECORD

Name: ______Date of Observation: ______

School: _ Grade/SubjectArea: ______

1. Briefly describe the students in this class, including those with special needs.
(Component 1b) / 6. How do you plan to engage students in the content? What will you do?
What will the students do? (Component 1e)
2. What are your goals and objectives for students for this lesson? What do you want the students to know and be able to do? (Component 1c) / 7. What difficulties do students typically experience in this area, and how do you plan to anticipate these difficulties? (Component 1a)
3. Why are these goals suitable for this group of students? (Component 1c) / 8. What instructional materials or other resources, if any, will you use?
(Component 1d)
4. How do these goals support the district’s content and performance standards?
(Components 1a and 1c) / 9. How do you plan to assess student achievement of the goals? What data will you collect? (Attach any tests or performance tasks, with accompanying scoring guides or rubrics.) (Component 1f)
5. How do these goals relate to broader curriculum goals in the discipline as a whole? (Component 1c) / 10.How do you plan to make use of the results of the assessment? (Component
1f)

Please us the back of this page to share any other relevant information.

4

Special Ed. Teacher’s Name: DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

School Year: Component 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content

ELEMENT / LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE
UNSATISFACTORY /

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

/ PROFICIENT /

EXCELLENT

Knowledge of
Content / Special Education Teacher makes content errors or does not correct content errors students make. / Special Education Teacher displays basic content knowledge but cannot articulate connections with other parts of the discipline or with other disciplines. / Special Education Teacher displays solid content knowledge and makes
connections between the content and other parts of the discipline and other disciplines. / Special Education Teacher displays extensive content knowledge, with evidence of continuing pursuit of such knowledge.
Knowledge of Prerequisite Relationships* / Special Education Teacher displays little understanding of prerequisite knowledge important for student learning of the content. / Special Education Teacher indicates some awareness of prerequisite learning, although such knowledge may be incomplete or inaccurate. / Special Education Teacher’s plans and practices reflect understanding of prerequisite relationships among topics and concepts. / Special Education Teacher actively builds on knowledge of
prerequisite relationships when describing instruction or seeking causes for student misunderstanding.
Knowledge of Content-related pedagogy / Special Education Teacher displays little understanding of pedagogical issues involved in student learning of the content. / Special Education Teacher displays basic pedagogical knowledge but does not anticipate student misconceptions. / Pedagogical practices reflect current research on best pedagogical practice within the discipline but without anticipating student misconceptions. / Special Education Teacher
displays continuing search for best practice and anticipates student misconceptions.
Knowledge of
IEP Content (see WCSD “look fors”) / Special Education Teacher fails to complete or use state mandated IEP forms. / Special Education Teacher uses state mandated IEP forms but does not complete all sections – including supplementary aids/services, related services, special education services, dates for ignition, duration of services, frequency, location, methods for reporting progress, and statewide and/or district-wide assessment. / Special Education Teacher uses forms and completes sections required. / Special Education Teacher uses forms, completed required sections and provides support/guidance to other team members on
compliance with forms.

*Prerequisite relationships: This is referring to a “dependent sequence,” or order, that assists students’ understanding, i.e., socks before shoes, place value before addition and subtraction.

*Content-related pedagogy: Teaching strategies closely aligned and supporting content outcomes, i.e. foreign language teachers who use the appropriate accent and physical education teachers who demonstrate skills rather than telling about them.

Special Ed. Teacher’s Name: DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

School Year: Component 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students

ELEMENT / LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE
UNSATISFACTORY /

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

/ PROFICIENT /

EXCELLENT

Knowledge of Characteristics of Age Group / Special Education Teacher displays minimal knowledge of developmental characteristics
of age group and the impact of the disability on student performance. / Special Education Teacher displays generally accurate knowledge of developmental characteristics of age group and the impact of the disability on student performance. / Special Education Teacher
displays thorough understanding of typical developmental characteristics of age group as well as exceptions to general patterns and the impact of the disability on student performance. / Special Education Teacher displays knowledge of typical developmental characteristics of age group, the impact of the disability on student performance, exceptions to the patterns, and the extent to which each student follows patterns.
Knowledge of Students’ Varied Approaches to Learning* / Special Education Teacher is unfamiliar with the different approaches to learning that student’s exhibit, such as learning styles, modalities, and different “intelligences.” / Special Education Teacher displays general understanding of the different approaches to learning that students exhibit, and
includes a limited variety in lesson planning. / Special Education Teacher
displays solid understanding of the different approaches to learning that different students exhibit and occasionally uses those
approaches. / Special Education Teacher uses, knowledge of students’ varied approaches to learning in instructional planning, as an integral part of their instructional planning repertoire.
Knowledge of Students’ Present Level of Performance / Special Education Teacher displays little knowledge of students’ present level of performance and of the students’ potential and does not indicate that such knowledge is valuable. / Special Education Teacher recognizes the value of understanding students’ present level of performance and the students’ potential but does not relate knowledge to goals and objectives. / Special Education Teacher displays knowledge of students’ present level of performance and student potential and loosely connects knowledge to the goals and objectives / Special Education Teacher displays knowledge of students’ present level of performance and the students’ potential and is directly correlated to the goals and objectives.
Knowledge of
Students’ Interests, Cultural Heritage, and Special Needs / Special Education Teacher displays little knowledge of students’ interests or cultural heritage and does not indicate that such knowledge is valuable. / Special Education Teacher recognizes the value of understanding students’ interests or cultural heritage but displays this knowledge for the class only as a whole. / Special Education Teacher
displays knowledge of the interests or cultural heritage of groups of students and recognizes the value of this knowledge. / Special Education Teacher displays knowledge of the interests or cultural heritage of each student.
Knowledge of Students’ Goals and Objectives / Goals do not address the needs of the student as defined in the present level of performance. / Goals loosely relate to the present levels of performance section of
the IEP but do not address areas of need for the student / Goals relate directly to the present levels of performance section of the IEP and address most areas of need for the student. / Goals relate directly to the present levels of performance section of the IEP and address all areas of need for the student.

Special Ed. Teacher’s Name: DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

School Year: Component 1c: Selecting Instructional/IEP Goals

ELEMENT / LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE
UNSATISFACTORY /

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

/ PROFICIENT /

EXCELLENT

Value (Instructional / IEP goals that align with district standards are based on assessment data and are essential to the discipline being taught). / Goals are not valuable and
represent low expectations or no conceptual understanding for students. Goals do not reflect important learning, and are not grounded in district’s content standards. / Goals are moderately valuable in
either their expectations or conceptual understanding for students and in importance of learning. / Goals are valuable in their level
of expectations, conceptual understanding, and importance of learning. If applicable, the goals are an integral part of prescribed intervention programs (such as SFA, Reading Recovery, etc.) / Not only are the goals valuable,
but Special Education Teacher can also clearly articulate how goals establish high expectations and relate to curriculum frameworks and standards. If applicable, the goals are an integral part of prescribed intervention programs
Clarity
(Goals stated as student learning that is assessable.) / Goals are either not clear or are stated as student activities. Goals do not permit viable methods of assessment. / Goals are only moderately clear or include a combination of
goals and activities. Some goals do not permit viable methods of assessment. / Most of the goals are clear but may include a few activities. Most permit viable methods of assessment. / All the goals are clear, written in the form of student learning, and include viable methods of assessment.
Suitable for Diverse
Students / Goals are not suitable for the diversity, ages, developmental levels, disability, prior knowledge, or backgrounds of class members. / Most of the goals are suitable for most students in the class. / All the goals are suitable for most students in the class. / Goals take into account the varying learning needs of individual students or groups.
Balance (Goals balance factual knowledge with conceptual understanding and longer units include reasoning, social & communication skills.) / Goals reflect only one type of learning and one discipline or strand. / Goals reflect several types of learning but no effort at coordination or integration. / Goals reflect several different types of learning and opportunities for integration. / Goals balance many different types of learning, and may include student initiative in establishing learning goals.

Special Ed. Teacher’s Name: DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

School Year: Component 1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources

ELEMENT / LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE
UNSATISFACTORY /

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

/ PROFICIENT /

EXCELLENT

Resources for
Teaching / Special Education Teacher is unaware of resources available through the school or district. / Special Education Teacher displays limited awareness or use of resources available through the school or district. / Special Education Teacher is fully aware of resources available through the school or district and makes use of them regularly. / In addition to being aware of school and district resources, teacher actively seeks and uses other materials to enhance instruction, for example, from professional organizations or through the community.
Resources for
Students / Special Education Teacher is unaware of resources available to assist students who need them. / Special Education Teacher displays limited awareness of resources available through the school or district. / Special Education Teacher is aware of resources available through the school or district and knows how to gain access for students. / In addition to being aware of school and district resources and support, Special Education Teacher is aware of how to access additional resources available
through the community and assists students in gaining access.
Knowledge of Technological Resources and Computer Literacy / Special Education Teacher rarely uses computer or other technology. Special Education Teacher has difficulty helping students with “high tech” assistive technology devices. / Special Education Teacher displays some computer literacy and comfort with other technology but use is limited. Special
Education Teacher does not always feel comfortable with the “high tech” assistive technology devices that students are trying to learn. / Special Education Teacher accesses and efficiently uses computers or other technology to assist with record keeping, report writing, and communication. Special Education Teacher is able to assist students to become more comfortable with technology. / Special Education Teacher uses the computer regularly and efficiently for record keeping, report writing and communication, and is able to develop additional ways to use technology to improve efficiency. Special Education Teacher can easily help students become more proficient with computer operated assistive technology devices.

Special Ed. Teacher’s Name: DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION