Archived Information

ESRA:Comprehensive Centers
FY2006Program Performance Report
Strategic Goal2
Other
ESRA, Title II, Section 203
Document Year2006Appropriation: $56,257
Program Goal: / To improve student achievement in low-performing schools under the No Child Left Behind Act.
Objective1of2: / Improve the quality of technical assistance.
Measure1.1of2: The percentage of Comprehensive Centers' products and services that are deemed to be of high quality by an independent review panel of qualified stakeholders. (Desired direction: increase)
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2006 / Set a Baseline / Not Collected / Not Collected
2007 / Set a Baseline / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 999 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 999 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 999 / (February 2011) / Pending

Source.U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Comprehensive Centers, independent review panel.

Frequency of Data Collection.Annual

Explanation.

Independent panel reviews will be conducted as part of a national evaluation of the program through an ED contract with an outside firm. The evaluation contract was awarded in August 2006, later than originallyanticipated.

Measure1.2of2: The percentage of Comprehensive Centers' products and services deemed to be of high relevance to educational practice by an independent review panel of qualified practitioners. (Desired direction: increase)
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2006 / Set a Baseline / Not Collected / Not Collected
2007 / Set a Baseline / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 999 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 999 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 999 / (February 2011) / Pending

Source.U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Comprehensive Centers, independent review panel.

Frequency of Data Collection.Annual

Explanation.Independent panel reviews will be conducted as part of a national evaluation of the program through an ED contract with an outside firm. The evaluation contract was awarded in August 2006, later than originally anticipated.

Objective2of2: / Technical assistance products and services will be used to improve results for children in the target areas.
Measure2.1of1: The percentage of all comprehensive centers' products and services that are deemed to be of high usefulness to educational policy or practice by target audiences. (Desired direction: increase)
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2006 / Set a Baseline / Not Collected / Not Collected
2007 / Set a Baseline / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 999 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 999 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 999 / (February 2011) / Pending

Source.U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Comprehensive Centers, survey of targeted audiences.

Frequency of Data Collection.Annual

Explanation.Surveys of target audienceswill be conducted as part of a national evaluation of the program through an ED contract with an outside firm. The evaluation contract was awarded in August 2006, later than originally anticipated.

U.S. Department of Education / 1 / 11/14/2006