Project write-up follows APA format as outlined on the second page of the instructions packet, including proper headings, citations and organization / Project write-up follows the APA format as outlined on the second page of the instructions packet with headings, citations and organization – only 1-2 minor errors. / Project write-up follows the APA format as outlined on the second page of the instructions packet with headings, citations and organization – only 3-4 minor errors. / Project write-up does not follow APA format as outlined on the second page of the instructions packet or include headings and organization.
Student has found literature from reputable sources. The literature is strongly related to their project and used to develop their research question. At least 3 sources are included from ProQuest. / Student has found literature from mostly reputable sources. The literature strongly related to their project and used to develop their research question. At least 2 sources are included from ProQuest. / Student has found literature from mostly reputable sources which is loosely related to their project and used to develop their research question. At least 1 source is included from ProQuest. / Student has found literature from mostly non-reputable source.
Research question is chosen with careful consideration and the choice is fully explained and supported using the discrepancy model and the review of literature. / Research question is chosen with careful consideration and the choice is mostly explained and supported using the discrepancy model and review of literature. / Research question is chosen with careful consideration and the choice is only partially explained. / Research method does not reflect consideration in regards to project topic.
Variables are discussed in detail and relate directly to the question posed by the research project.
The operational definition of the research variables are clearly written and detailed. / Variables are discussed relate directly to the question posed by the research project.
The operational definitions of the research variables are clearly written. / Variables are discussed and relate loosely to the question posed by the research project.
The operational definition of the research variables need only minor clarification. / Variables are not discussed.
Operational definitions are missing or incorrect.
Research design section describes procedure clearly and in detail. The experiment is easily replicable. Population and sample are well chosen and representative of the population being addressed. Ethics are properly addressed. / Research design section describes procedure in detail. The experiment is mostly replicable. Population and sample are well chosen and representative of the population being addressed. Ethics are properly addressed. / Research design section describes procedure in detail. The experiment is mostly replicable. Population and sample are mostly well chosen OR representative of the population being addressed. Ethics are properly addressed. / Research design is not replicable. Several items are missing.
Data collected from study is organized and included in paper. The results section describes key descriptive and inferential statistics from the study. Corresponding graphs and charts are included and well-chosen to accurately represent the data. The results section summarizes data without drawing conclusions. / Data collected is organized and included in the paper. The results section describes key descriptive statistics from the study. Graphs and charts are included and accurately represent the data. The results section summarizes data without drawing conclusions. / Data collected is included in the paper. The results section mentions key descriptive data from the study. Graphs and charts are included. The results section summarizes data without drawing conclusions. / Only raw data is included with no description OR graphs, charts or data is missing.
Analysis of data is thorough. Possible interpretations of the data are discussed. No causal relationship is implied. Write-up addresses possible errors and implications for further research. / Analysis of data is thorough. Possible interpretations of the data are discussed. Write-up addresses possible errors and implications for further research. / Analysis of data is thorough. Possible interpretations of the data are discussed. / Analysis is only partially developed.
Standards Addressed
APS.SOC.9-12.II_1» Psychology » Social Studies » Advanced Placement Standards
Research Methods
CCSS.LA.11-12.R.CCR.1- Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RST.11-12.2 (CCSS.LA.11-12.R.CCR.2)
Determine the central ideas or conclusions of a text; summarize complex concepts, processes, or information presented in a text by paraphrasing them in simpler but still accurate terms.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RST.11-12.7 (CCSS.LA.11-12.R.CCR.7)
Integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media (e.g., quantitative data, video, multimedia) in order to address a question or solve a problem.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.WHST.11-12.8 (CCSS.LA.11-12.W.CCR.8)
Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the specific task, purpose, and audience; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and overreliance on any one source and following a standard format for citation.
CCSS.LA.11-12.WHST.PDW- Production and Distribution of Writing
CCSS.LA.11-12.W.CCR.7- Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects based on focused questions, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.
CCSS.LA.11-12.W.CCR.9- Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.