An Insider's Notes on Lazar and Gravity
archived as
more of Bob Lazar at
an Insider's notes on Lazar and Gravity
{StealthSkater: the following was extracted from a personal e-mail; the sender requested his name be kept anonymous}
… … My perspective on gravity has radically shifted lately. I've talked to a LOT of physicists and come to realize that the formal physics community is like the Spanish Inquisition when it comes to gravity research. LOTS of really great physicists have ideas about it, but they're too scared to come forward and really work with each other. That hinders progress. The problem with gravity is largely a scientific culture thing, at least as I perceive it.
That being said, the experts don't tend to even mention their best ideas because they don't feel confident about them being correct without the standard peer-review process. Kind of a "catch-22", especially because everybody is waiting for the other guy to solve the problem first ....
I have LOTS of trouble with Lazar's story. And I have talked to Lazar extensively on the phone. What I do know is that he is in deeper than anyone admits, and a lot of his contacts are definitely peripheral figures that might be related to the UFO thing. Whether-or-not he worked on them is something that I cannot really guess about, though. I just think it's interesting that for how badly most people want to avoid him, he nonetheless is at least a part of this black project community to some degree.
On the other hand, I myself have some level of involvement with 2-or-3 different classified government projects at the moment. And I haven't seen ANYTHING to support UFO claims. Damned sad, too, because I'm really starting to wonder about the Area-51 stories. I know that they test secret aircraft there. But how is that 'secret' anymore? I even know a couple of engineers that have had projects test-flown there. Although if either of these guys has actually been there, they are firmly denying it (at least to me).
In terms of aircraft & UFO technology, the most advanced thing that I know about officially are those UAV projects. There are a couple of rumors that the British (Marcus) and USA have anti-gravity projects. But the American project is still very classified (and I don't know if it's more than a rumor). UAVs are interesting. But if that's the limit of our real technology, then God help us!
One thing that I do know with certainty is that as an inventor, you can gain access to projects that are otherwise completely off-limits. There is a tremendous shortage of the kind of creative problem solvers out there that can work miracles on a shoestring budget. They tend to share intractable problems with other inventors (culturally like the Chinese nuclear scientist scandal during the Clinton Administration). The formal guys are great to have around. But they are in a different community. They spend a lot of money and often freak out if something isn't straightforward to build. Different communities and different approaches to problem solving.
In their defense, without REAL scientists, things don't actually move forward though inventors are great. But Science usually doesn't move forward as a result. Most of the real theories behind Tesla's work came from reverse-engineering his work. I doubt that Tesla technology would have gone very far after his death without being actually scientifically analyzed.
I dunno… I tend to go back and forth on which community is better. Maybe they are just different. Being an inventor is certainly less livable than a scientist. Most PhD physicists actually take vacations, and their work is usually understood by people (even if only other scientists). Also, they can get teaching jobs and have a steady income. Inventors take a lot more risk. And it takes them a lot longer to find out if they are making mistakes with their research!
To be honest, I have been having issues in terms of research-direction lately. I have a vague idea of what I should be researching. But I am not sure about some of the specifics that I need to undertake to move forward.
One of the problems also is that since I have been working more closely with the formal community, I have also developed a good feel for non-workability in a lot of the ideas that I would have otherwise pursued. The attitude of dismissal from the conventional community tends to rub off on you, even if you know better :o)
I've noticed that Naudin has been pretty quiet lately. Other than the cold-fusion experiments, I haven't seen as much AG work as I would have hoped to have seen from him in the last few months.