Air Force Mass Media 1
References
Areni, C.S., Ferrell, M.E., Wilcox, J.B. (2000). The persuasive impact of reported group
opinions on individuals low vs. high in need for cognition: rationalization vs. biased elaboration? Psychology & Marketing,17, 855-877.
Booth-Butterfield, S., & Welbourne, J. (2002). The elaboration likelihood model: Its impact on persuasion theory and research. In J. P. Dillard, & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice, (pp. 155-173). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Bryant J. & Thompson, S. (2002). Fundamentals of media effects. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Blumler, J., & Gurevitch M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In Blumler, J. & Katz E. (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19-31). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. Social influence: The Ontario
symposium, (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes (pp. 305-349). Orlando: Harcourt Brace.
Eveland, W. P., & Scheufele, D.A. (2000). Connecting news media use with gaps in
knowledge and participation. Political Communication,17, 215-237.
Griffin, R.J., Neuwirth, K., Giese, J., Dunwoody, S. (2002). Linking the heuristic
systematic model and depth of processing. Communication Research,29, 705-732.
Hennessy, B.C. (1970). Public Opinion (2nd Ed.).Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Hughes, J. (1997). Solving the media’s credibility problems. Christian Science Monitor, 89, (p. 19).
Ibelema, M., & Powell, L. (2001). Cable television news viewed as most credible. Newspaper Research Journal, 22(1), 41-50.
Infante, D. A., Rancer, A. S., & Womack, D. F. (1997). Building communication theory. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Kahlor, L.A., Dunwoody, S., Griffin, R.J., Neuwirth, K., & Giese, J. (2003). Studying
heuristic-systematic processing of risk communication. Risk Analysis,23, 355-368.
Krugman, H.E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without
involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly,29, 349-356.
Krugman, H.E. (1971). Brain wave measures of media involvement. Journal of
Advertising Research,11, 3-9.
Krugman, H.E. (2000). Memory without recall, exposure without perception. Journal of
Advertising Research, 40, 49-55.
Littlejohn, S., & Gray, R. (1996). Theories of human communication. Belmont, CA: Wadworth.
Luchok, J.A., & McCroskey, J.C. (1978). The effect of quality evidence on attitude change and source credibility. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 43, 371-383.
Luo, X. (2002). Uses and gratifications theory and e-commerce behaviors: A structural equation modeling study. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2 (2), Retrieved April 19, 2004 from
Marks, A. (1998). To public, the press too often gets it wrong. Christian Science Monitor,91(15), (p. 2).
McCroskey, J.C., & Wheeless, L.R. (1976). Introduction to human communication. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
McCroskey, J.C., & Young, T.J. (1981). Ethos and credibility: The construct and its’ measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal, 32, 24-34
McLeod, J., & Becker, L. (1981). The uses and gratifications approach. In Nimmo, D, & Sanders K. (Eds.), Handbook of political communication (pp. 67-99), Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
Miller, K. (2002). Communication theories: Perspectives, processes, and contexts. Boston: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Neuwirth, K., Frederick, E., & Mayo, C. (2002). Person-effects and heuristic-systematic
processing. Communication Research,29, 320-359.
O’Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L.A., & Rosengren, K.E. (1985). Uses and gratifications research: the past ten years. In K.E. Rosengren, L.A. Wenner, & P. Palgreen, (Eds.), Media gratifications research (pp. XX-XX). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: The central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., Kasmer, J. A., & Haugtvedt, C. P. (1987). A reply to Stiff and Boster.Communications Monographs, 54, 257-263.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kasmer, J. (1988). The role of affect in the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Communication, social cognition, and affect (pp. 117-146).Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135-146.
Petty, R.E., Wegener, D.T., Fabrigar, L.R., Priester, J.R., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1993). Conceptual and methodological issues in the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: A reply to the MichiganState critics. Communication Theory, 3, 336-362.
Pfau, M., & Parrott, R. (1993). Persuasive Communication Campaigns. Needham
Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Priester, J., Wegener, D., Petty, R. E., Fabrigar, L. (1999). Examining the psychological process underlying the sleeper effect: The elaboration likelihood model explanation. Media Psychology, 1, 27-48.
Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. (1969). Social Psychology. New York: Harper & Row,
Publishers.
Stiff, J. B. (1986). Cognitive processing of persuasive message cues: A meta-analytic
review of the effects of supporting information on attitudes. Communication Monographs, 53, 75-89.
Todorov, A., Chaiken, S., & Henderson, M.D. (2002). The heuristic-systematic model of
social information processing. In J.P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The Persuasion Handbook, Developments in Theory and Practice (pp. 195-211). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Westley, B.H. & Severin, W.J. (1964). Some correlates of media credibility.
Journalism Quarterly, 41, 325-335.
Wright, P.L. (1974). Analyzing media effects on advertising responses. Public Opinion
Quarterly,28, 192-205.
Zuckerman, A., & Chaiken, S. (1998). A heuristic-systematic processing analysis of the
effectiveness of product warning labels. Psychology & Marketing,15, 621-642.