Kyiv Post
Contact info:
Telephone:+38-044-234-6500.
Address: Kyiv Post, Prorizna Street 22B, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01034.
About Kyiv Post:
Kyiv Post is Ukraine’s leading English-language newspaper. The Kyiv Post played a vital role as one of the few independent media outlets under former President Leonid Kuchma. Over the years, the weekly newspaper has led the charge for a free press in Ukraine, and has played roles in the Georgiy Gongadze scandal, the Orange Revolution and other significant Ukrainian events. It is produced by a team of Western and Ukrainian journalists. Launched in 1995, the newspaper's circulation is 25,000 copies.
Mohammad Zahoor, Owner and Publisher
Jim Phillipoff, Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Staff:
Brian Bonner, Chief Editor (*our Confederation partner contact)
Katya Gorchinskaya, Deputy Chief Editor
Roman Olearchyk, Deputy Chief Editor
James Marson, Business Editor
Yuliya Popova, Lifestyle Editor
Valeriya Kolisnyk, News Editor
Alexey Bondarev, News Editor
Yaroslav Debelyi, Photo Editor
Tetyana Boychenko, Staff Writer
Peter Byrne, Staff Writer
Oksana Faryna, Staff Writer
Natalia A. Feduschak, Staff Writer
Roman Feshchenko, Staff Writer
Olga Gnativ, Staff Writer
Kateryna Grushenko, Staff Writer
Nataliya Horban, Staff Writer
John Marone, Staff Writer
Olesia Oleshko, Staff Writer
Yuriy Onyshkiv, Staff Writer
Iryna Prymachyk, Staff Writer
Mark Rachkevych, Staff Writer
Marie Shamota, Staff Writer
Nataliya Solovonyuk, Staff Writer
Svitlana Tuchynska, Staff Writer
Vlad Lavrov, Staff Writer
Vladyslav Zakharenko, Chief Designer
Oleksiy Boyko, Photographer
Svitlana Kolesnykova, Newsroom Manager
About Brian Bonner:
Chief Editor
Time at Kyiv Post: June 2008 – Present (2 years 6 months)
Job description: Ukraine's oldest and finest English-language newspaper has a staff of 30 talented and hard-working professionals. We are growing in print and online after the 2008 purchase by new owner and publisher, Mohammad Zahoor, and now publish online in Ukrainian and Russian languages at
Previous jobs: Associate Director, International Communications at Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids in Washington DC from May 2007 – June 2008 (1 year 2 months)
Description: Worked in India, Russia and Ukraine to promote anti-smoking programs for a great non-profit organization supported by the great billionaire philanthropist, New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg.
Reporter and assigning editor at St. Paul Pioneer Press from 1983 – 2007 (24 years)
Spent nearly 24 years as a staff writer or assigning editor at Minnesota's second-largest newspaper. Covered crime, courts, city hall and political beats. Worked on enterprise and investigative projects. Traveled the nation for top stories. Worked abroad in Sri Lanka, Thailand, Russia, Ukraine and Laos for the once-mighty, but now defunct, Knight Ridder Newspapers. Left the newspaper shortly after its purchase by MediaNews Group. Proud union member of the Communications Workers of America's Newspaper Guild, Local No. 2.
Education: University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
About Mohammad Zahoor:
Owner and Publisher
Mohammad Zahoor buys Kyiv Post for an estimated $1.1 million
Jul 30, 2009 at 20:42 | Brian Bonner
American founder sold paper into ‘good hands’ while new owner says 'best years’ are still ahead.
Mohammad Zahoor, a United Kingdom citizen who owns the ISTIL Group, has purchased the Kyiv Post in a deal valued by Dragon Capital investment bank at roughly $1.1 million.
Zahoor bought the newspaper, Ukraine’s top English-language news publication since 1995, from its founder and only owner, American Jed Sunden. Sunden announced the sale at a noon meeting on July 29to Kyiv Post staff members. Zahoor was not present.
However, in announcing the acquisition, Zahoor pledged to continue and strengthen Kyiv Post traditions of independent and investigative journalism.
“We believe that the best years of the Kyiv Post lie ahead, and we have great plans for the brand’s development, in print, on the Internet and with other media as well,” Zahoor said. “We are committed to upholding the Kyiv Post’s high standards of independent journalism, and will continue to allow the editors the freedom that they previously enjoyed. We recognize that the Kyiv Post was one of the few truly independent voices in Ukrainian media since its inception, which is why it enjoys almost unparalleled trust among its readership.”
While neither sided disclosed the purchase price, Dragon Capital estimated the deal at $1.1 million, “based on our 2009 financial projections for KP Media and current multiples at which publishing companies are traded,” according to its July 30 investment report.
Dragon Capital helped Sunden’s KP Media, the Kyiv Post’s former owner, sell 20 percent of the company’s shares in 2006, raising $11 million.
ISTIL Group is active in real estate, media, telecommunications, film production and television production, among other businesses in Ukraine and elsewhere. ISTIL stands for International Steel & Tube Industries, Ltd. The company has offices in Kyiv and was founded by Zahoor in 1991.
A native of Pakistan, Zahoor is a multi-millionaire who earned his fortune in steel production and trading in Donetsk. He sold the steel business more than a year ago – at the peak of the market, analysts say -- and has been investing into other areas, building up an impressive and diversified portfolio of assets.
Representatives of Zahoor and Sunden had been negotiating the sale intensively for the last two months and Sunden said he entertained other bids.
The sale includes both the newspaper and the KyivPostwebsite, whose audience has been growing dramatically since a mid-September upgrade. The newspaper currently employs 22 people in news, advertising, marketing, distribution and accounting. But Zahoor expressed interest in hiring additional staff members to expand and improve the newspaper.
While the print version of the newspaper is published every Friday, the website is now continuously updated with staff reports andstories from Reuters, Associated Press, Interfax and other news services.
The deal brings to an end a 14-year era of Kyiv Post ownership by Sunden. The newspaper started with humble origins only four years into Ukraine’s independence, with $8,000 and six employees. But its reputation as a beacon of independent journalism and its financial success grew quickly.
In announcing the sale, Sunden said that money wasn’t the only factor in selling to ISTIL Group. Sunden said that he believes that the Kyiv Post will be “in good hands” under Zahoor’s ownership.
The Kyiv Post was the first publication in Sunden’s KP Media company, which has grown to includenumerous other publications and websites. Other KP Media properties include the Russian-language Korrespondent magazine (launched in 2002) and website, BigMir (launced in 2000), Afisha andKyiv Business Directory.
But, as Dragon Capital noted in its July 30 report, the last year has been difficult for KP Media.
“The economic decline, accompanied by a sharp contraction of the domestic advertising market, forced KP Media to close all new publications it had launched after its 2006 private placement, including the metro daily 15 Minutes, Ukrainian-language women’s magazines Pani and Vona and weekly news magazine Novynar.”
Dragon Capital expects that “KP Media will likely use the sale proceeds to replenish its working capital and reduce debt burden. Given the difficult situation on the market and in the company, we do not rule out KP Media will be forced to divest its other print media, such as entertainment weekly Afisha and some joint print projects. We expect that after KP Media cleans up its print media portfolio, the only exception being its very successful Korrespondent weekly magazine, it will continue to develop its Internet business.”
Zahoor said he has “the highest respect for the people at KP Media, and wish them the best of success in the future.”
Richest Expats: Mohammad Zahoor
Oct 8 at 01:12 | Kyiv Post
While it may look strange and self-serving for the Kyiv Post to declare its publisher the richest foreigner in Ukraine, Mohammad Zahoor certainly appears to have earned the title. If anyone knows of another expatriate worth between $500 million and $1 billion, the estimated size of Zahoor’s fortune, please let us know and we will set the record straight.
Zahoor certainly didn’t get where he is today – namely, wealthy – by owning the Kyiv Post. Zahoor punched his ticket the hard way: making steel in rough-and-tumble Donetsk. He came to Ukraine in 1974 as a student from Pakistan, the start of his pioneering expatriate career.
He learned Russian and metallurgy well. Then he eventually found a way to apply those skills in Ukraine, one of the world’s top 10 steel-exporting nations.
Zahoor also displayed a talent for knowing when to get out of a business, as he did in 2008 by selling his Donetsk steel mill for a top-drawer price of $1 billion.
Zahoor is now the chairman and owner of the ISTIL Group, which went on an asset-buying spree in the last two years, including the small (for him) purchase of the Kyiv Post in 2009 for $1.1 million from its founder, American Jed Sunden.
Zahoor left Karachi, Pakistan, to study metallurgy in Donetsk in 1974.
He worked in Pakistan after graduating, but made Ukraine his home after working in Moscow, making frequent business trips to secure metals contracts.
At that time, Zahoor and a Thai businessman were running Metalsrussia, a Hong Kong-registered trading company based in Moscow.
“It was luck, of course, being at the right place at the right time, and my strong knowledge of the market.”
- Mohammad Zahoor.
It soon became the main trader of Russia’s Cherepovets metallurgy factory.
The business was going well and Zahoor didn’t think of moving to Ukraine until 1993, when Thailand imposed an anti-dumping duty on Russian rolled metal.
He soon became heavily invested in Ukraine.
Zahoor, a British citizen, renamed the company as the ISTIL Group in 1991 and made it a diversified holding company, with such interests as Aleana, a plastics manufacturer.
But his main line of business was metals. He helped steel mills in several nations improve their product and learn how to transport the finished material to its destination without damage.
“It was luck, of course, being at the right place at the right time, and my strong knowledge of the market,” he said.
He learned his first tough lesson about mixing business with politics during the 1994 presidential campaign. Incumbent President Leonid Kravchuk’s advisers had asked Zahoor to speak on Kravchuk’s behalf as a major investor. His speech was broadcast on TV and was a success.
But a few months later, Kravchuk’s rival, Leonid Kuchma, won the presidency.
“We had serious problems,” Zahoor recalled. The pressure from the government had not eased up even by 1996, when he decided to invest into a dying Donetsk Metallurgical Plant. Since then, Zahoor decided to never lend his public support to any Ukrainian politicians.
“These two [media and real estate] are our main fields of interest. Real estate is doing really bad now, but it’s a good time to buy.”
- Mohammad Zahoor.
Competitors muscled him out of a big steel mill in 2000, but Zahoor found a way to modernize the mini-steel mill left in his control and prosper before cashing out in 2008.
Today, the ISTIL Group of companies employs up to 1,000 people. The owner has turned most of his attention to building up a portfolio of Ukrainian media and real estate assets.
“These two [media and real estate] are our main fields of interest,” he said. “Real estate is doing really bad now, but it’s a good time to buy.”
He purchased the landmark Leipzig Hotel near the Golden Gate in the heart of Kyiv’s center. The five-story, 9,620 square-meter building is an architectural gem that has sat empty for more than a decade.
He invested in RialtoBusinessCenter in Podil, not far from the Petrivka metro stop.
Reconstruction is under way in the 15,000 square-meter building, which will feature the latest digital fiber optic communications technologies and the latest in energy-efficient heating and cooling. He also bought the old Kinopanorama movie theater and owns ISTIL Studios, a state-of-the-art film and television production center, among other new assets.
He is the husband of singer-actress Kamaliya.
--
Mention of STRATFOR in Kyiv Post
Kyiv Post has re-published several of our pieces in their opinion section over the past few months, including:
- The outlook for Russian influence in Moldova
- Russia makes moves to gain control of Ukraine’s Naftogaz
- Yanukovych lets Russia reassert control over nation, Moldova
- Lauren's weekly on Russian Grain
They have also published two interviews, one with George (on US-Ukraine relations) and one with Eugene (on Chinese investment in Ukraine).
George’s interview:
Stratfor’s Friedman: ‘Simplest thing the U.S. can do is to send Hillary Clinton’
Jul 1 at 22:33 | Nataliya Bugayova
Here are excerpts from a Kyiv Post interview with George Friedman, an American political scientist and founder of the Stratfor global intelligence firm and author of several books, including the bestseller, “The Next 100 Years.”
Prospects of U.S.-Ukraine relations
“U.S.-Ukraine relations will depend completely on Ukraine right now. The recent [presidential] election has produced a government which is moving away from confrontation with Moscow and moving closer to Moscow. The question is how close Ukraine will have to move. One scenario is that Ukraine remains autonomous and has bilateral relations with both Russians and with other countries.
“The second scenario is that Ukraine moves more comfortably into the Russian orbit and focuses relations on Russia. In this case, the question is whether the United States wants to be seen by the Russians as intruding in the bilateral relations, whether the United States wants to compete with Russia for Ukrainians, can it compete and whether it is in its national interests?
“Russia is looking closely at the region, particularly after the 2004 Orange Revolution. They are feeling very vulnerable. Russia had a very important reset – the reset of relations with Ukraine. The question is whether Ukrainians believe they somehow can ‘have a cake out of it and eat it too’: [meaning] to have bilateral relations with Russians and, nevertheless, cooperate with Americans too. They possibly can, but this is not the question of U.S. - Ukraine relations. It depends on Russia-Ukraine relations.”
About Ukraine’s policy
“Let’s put ourselves in the position of Russia: They saw a major neighbor whose internal politics pushed it to become part of a hostile military bloc. If I were a Russian leader, I can’t imagine how that could be in Russia’s interest. And I would have had responded.
“Ukraine expected that the U.S. would perform a miracle and provide an umbrella in case the Russians try to frighten Ukraine. Ukraine discovered this is not something that the United States can provide: It is busy elsewhere with other issues … What was possible in 1995 was not possible in 2005. The Russians achieved it.
“Now Ukrainians have to decide how many risks they are willing to take with the Russians, how much they want to resist getting closer to Moscow and what the risks are of the Russian response and possibility that Russians will temper their response to maintain good relations with the U.S. With American forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, Russians read [that] they have a window of opportunity to rectify relations not only with Ukraine, but with other former Soviet Union republics. They move rather quickly to consolidate their relationships: for instance, the union with Kazakhstan and Belarus. Will they be pressing Ukraine to become a member of it and what will that mean?
“Decisions have to be made in Kyiv. However, after the 2004 Orange Revolution, Ukrainians are engaged in fantasy about how the world works. The question is whether, at this point, the Ukrainian political system arrived at the level of maturity so it is able to sort out the relations to its best advantage or it will continue to take unrealistic positions.”
U.S. abandonment
“The national interests are not flat. There is a hierarchy, which is not arranged according to what the U.S. wants it to be, but what it is dealing with at the time.
“Now, when the U.S. is involved in the Mideast to such extent, it cannot afford confrontations with Russians: Russians can ship weapons to Iran, Syria, they can destabilize situation in Afghanistan, etc. The U.S. would not want to destabilize Ukraine-Russia relations and risk the Russian response: We have people fighting in those countries and simply cannot afford it.
“American policy would be to deny that it is making such a choice, because we cannot publicly admit it. And the simplest thing the U.S. can do is to send [U.S. Secretary of State] Hillary Clinton. It costs a few thousand dollars for the flight and hotel room. She will make few speeches, but she has nothing she can promise.”
What does Ukraine want?
“Ukrainians are always asking questions about American intentions and Russian intentions, but never about their own intentions. They are completely focused on what other players are doing. Hillary is coming and it would be good if Ukrainians try to make her interested in what they want.
“Ukrainian maturity, in which they disguise what they would want to do within the context of what it currently possible, so they make the best situation out it, just isn’t there.
“Clinton comes. Many will think it is a major event. Hillary goes many places. ‘When we can’t send troops, we send Hillary.’ For me as observer, it’s still unclear what Ukraine’s foreign policy is.
“It seems it consists of going with whatever forces seem to be more powerful and having wishes that are completely unconnected to Ukraine’s political situation or power.
“One does not notice Ukrainians thinking the following way: ‘We don’t want to fall into Russian arms. We are not going to search for help from Americans or Germans, etc.
Therefore, we are going to build our own military forces.’ This is not discussed in Ukraine.
“Ukraine expects that other countries will subordinate their national interests in order to benefit Ukraine. It is not the way the world works.”
What’s next?
“If I would form Ukraine’s foreign policy, I would suggest that it accepts the benefits of relations with Russians, while expecting an outside power partner to protect Ukraine’s economy.
This expectation is not likely to happen. The only thing that can happen is something we don’t expect, which is the united Ukrainian response: balance economic relations with Moscow and a strong political-military force. Ukraine is, after all, a major country. But then, Ukrainians do not want to spend money on military.”