Name______Period ______

Achieve 3000 Article 6 (3rd Quarter)

Before Reading Poll

In the 1950s, Americans feared communism because they felt it threatened democracy in the United States. What do you think?

Fear, whether real or not, can cause people to act in dangerous ways. (CIRCLE ONE)

Top of Form

  • Agree
  • Disagree

Bottom of Form

Article

WASHINGTON, D.C.(Achieve3000, September 12, 2008). In 1951, Ethel Rosenberg and her husband Julius were convicted of conspiracy to commit espionage and were consequently sentenced to death. Now, newly released transcripts of the court proceedings provide powerful evidence that Ethel's conviction and execution were based on perjured testimony.

The Rosenberg trial took place during the height of the Cold War. At that time, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were competing to develop ever more sophisticated weaponry. Both the democratic United States and the communist Soviet Union believed that successful advancements in technology would enable them to assert strength and superiority. In 1945, the U.S. set off two atomic bombs, effectively ending World War II. Four years later, the Soviet Union test-launched an atomic bomb, raising suspicions within the U.S. government. According to U.S. officials, the test suggested that top-secret atomic weapons information had been stolen by someone within the U.S. and delivered to the Soviets.

Evidence of a spy ring operating within the U.S. was quickly discovered. In 1950, the U.S. learned that David Greenglass, a machinist who assisted in building atomic bombs for the military in New Mexico, had provided confidential information to a Soviet spy. Upon his arrest, Greenglass cooperated with authorities and confessed his crimes. He also revealed that his sister's husband, Julius Rosenberg, had requested information for the Soviets. Greenglass was sentenced to 15 years in prison.

The government relentlessly investigated Julius Rosenberg and his wife, Ethel. Officials uncovered proof that Julius had engaged in espionage, but they had no evidence of Ethel's involvement. Still, after interviewing more than 40 people in front of a grand jury, prosecutors indicted both Julius and Ethel for conspiracy to commit espionage. Though the pair steadfastly proclaimed their innocence, the Rosenbergs were convicted in 1951. They were sentenced to death, and in 1953, the U.S. government carried out the execution.

The Rosenberg case was highly controversial, triggering global protests. Some felt the Rosenbergs failed to receive a fair trial. They said this was a result of their suspected ties to communist organizations during a time of heightened sensitivity to communism in the U.S. Over the years, the debate never fully died down.

In 2001, the controversy heated up again when David Greenglass, one of the two key witnesses against Ethel, withdrew his testimony, admitting to reporter Sam Roberts that he had lied under oath about his sister. Greenglass said that prosecutors encouraged him to accuse Ethel by promising to protect his wife, Ruth, from prosecution. Driven by this pledge, David and Ruth Greenglass falsely testified that Ethel had typed stolen atomic secrets from notes he had taken. The testimony provided the direct involvement that the jury needed to convict Ethel and that the judge needed to sentence her to death.

Prosecutors had hoped that such evidence would convince Ethel's husband Julius to divulge the names of his communist co-conspirators in exchange for her life, but it did not. David Greenglass said he never expected his sister to receive the death penalty.

The information provided by David Greenglass in 2001 prompted a lawsuit by Sam Roberts and a team of lawyers, historians, and private organizations. The lawsuit, which was successful, asked the government to release transcripts of the grand jury testimony that took place before the Rosenberg trial.

After poring over the transcripts of the grand jury testimony, lawyers and historians found that Ruth Greenglass had changed her story between the grand jury testimony and the trial. Nowhere in her grand jury testimony did Ruth tell the story about witnessing Ethel type up the secrets. Ruth and David never mentioned that information until days before the trial began. In fact, in her grand jury testimony, Ruth said she herself wrote out the secrets—in longhand. (That testimony is consistent with decrypted Soviet communication from the era. In that communication, the Soviets describe material in longhand received from the Rosenbergs.)

According to law professor David Vladeck, the grand jury testimony from Ruth confirms that the trial testimony about Ethel typing secrets is a complete fabrication.

"The Rosenberg case illustrates the excesses that can occur when we're afraid," said Meredith Fuchs, part of the team that fought to get the testimony released. "In the 1950s, we were afraid of communism. Today, we're afraid of terrorism. We don't want to make the same mistakes we made 50 years ago."

In a surprise development, Ethel's innocence was further confirmed this month by a man who was convicted along with the Rosenbergs on espionage charges in 1951. Morton Sobell, 91, admitted for the first time that he and Julius spied for the Soviet Union. Sobell said that he believes Ethel was aware of the spy activity, but that she didn't participate herself.

PAGE 2

Dig Deeper

As you read in "Case Against Rosenberg Falls Apart," the Rosenberg trial took place in the 1950s, when the Cold War was at its peak. As the U.S. and the Soviet Union competed for dominance, fear of the spread of communism led many Americans to believe that members of the Communist party were in their midst, and that these secret Communists were more than likely loyal to the Soviet Union. Historians often call this wave of fear the "Red Scare."

It wasn't the first time that America had been caught up in this kind of fear. During World War I, which lasted from 1914 to 1918, socialist groups spoke out against the war. Amidst an atmosphere of patriotism, they were seen as unpatriotic. In the years after the war, socialists were highly visible because of their advocacy for workers' rights. The 1917 communist revolution in Russia fueled fears that the spread of the socialists' "un-American" beliefs—which shared many similarities with communist ideology—could ignite a revolution in the U.S., too.

When the Cold War developed in the late 1940s, Americans again began to fear that communism could creep into the United States. In 1947, under pressure to show that he was making every effort to prevent the spread of communism, President Harry S. Truman established a program to investigate federal government employees. Employees who were suspected of harboring Communist party loyalties were tried by a Loyalty Board. The purpose of these investigations was to ensure loyalty to the United States, but the system was not without flaws. The proceedings were often leaked to the media and an anxious public. There was no penalty for perjury. While the board did not have the authority to imprison people it found guilty, some were fired when they could not prove their loyalty. Their names were often publicized, and they were denied other jobs.

Fear of communism even reached Hollywood. A congressional group called the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) investigated communist influence in the entertainment industry, issuing subpoenas to writers, actors, directors, and studio executives and asking them, "Are you or have you ever been a member of the Communist party?" Suspicious individuals found themselves on "blacklists" even when there was no evidence of any wrongdoing, and movie studios often refused to hire them.

One of the most famous names associated with the Red Scare is Senator Joseph McCarthy. McCarthy was not affiliated with HUAC (which involved the House of Representatives, not the Senate). Still, he fed fears of communism by asserting that the Communist party was influencing and threatening many aspects of American life. He did so to such an extent that the practice of accusing people of disloyalty without evidence is now known as "McCarthyism."

The atmosphere of the Red Scare fed the zeal behind the Rosenberg trial—and as you read, prompted the government to condemn even people for whom there was little evidence of guilt.

Activity

Top of Form
1. According to the article, what caused a team of lawyers, historians, and private organizations to launch a lawsuit on behalf of Ethel Rosenberg?
  • The fact that Julius Rosenberg, Ethel's husband, had provided information to the Soviet government
  • The fact that the government lawyers relentless interviewed over 40 witnesses in front of a grand jury
  • The fact that officials had proof of Julius Rosenberg's involvement, but no evidence of Ethel's guilt
  • The fact that her brother, David Greenglass, confessed that he had lied under oath about his sister
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
2. Which information isnotin the article?
  • The year that the Rosenbergs were executed by the U.S. government
  • The name of a private organization that participated in the lawsuit
  • The year that Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were sentenced to death
  • The name of the man who confessed to spying for the Soviet Union
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
3. Which of these is a statement of opinion?
  • Ethel Rosenberg was found guilty of conspiracy to commit espionage and was executed.
  • Ruth Greenglass originally said that she herself wrote out the atomic secrets by hand.
  • David Greenglass was a machinist who assisted in building bombs for the military.
  • David and Ruth Greenglass should be charged with causing the death of Ethel Rosenberg.
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
4. Which is the closestsynonymfor the wordfabrication?
  • Foreboding
  • Filament
  • Falsehood
  • Foresight
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
5. What is theeighthparagraph mainly about?
  • The reason that lawyers and historians concluded that Julius and Ethel Rosenberg had not committed espionage
  • The reasons that lawyers and historians concluded that Ruth Greenglass had committed perjury during the trial
  • The methods used by the U.S. government to investigate witnesses who gave testimony at the grand jury
  • The lawsuit brought by Sam Roberts and his team asking the government to release the grand jury transcripts
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
6. In thelastparagraph, the author presents information about Morton Sobell in order to ______.
  • Provide additional information that has recently come to light further confirming Ethel Rosenberg's innocence
  • Prove that there is a clear need for the government to release transcripts of grand jury testimony in important cases
  • Stress that Ethel Rosenberg knew that her husband was conspiring to commit espionage but did not blame him
  • Criticize prosecutors at the grand jury trial who failed to get Julius Rosenberg to reveal his co-conspirator's name
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
7. Which of these shouldnotbe included in a summary of this article?
  • The Rosenberg trial took place at a time of heightened sensitivity to communism.
  • The military facility where atomic bombs were built was located in New Mexico.
  • David Greenglass confessed to Sam Roberts that he had lied about Ethel Rosenberg.
  • Newly released information indicates that Ruth Greenglass gave false testimony.
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
8. The article states:
Prosecutors had hoped that such evidence would convince Ethel's husband Julius todivulgethe names of his communist co-conspirators in exchange for her life, but it did not.
Which would be the closestsynonymfor the worddivulge?
  • Disrupt
  • Disengage
  • Dismantle
  • Disclose
Bottom of Form

Thought Question

Explain why Americans were so afraid of the Soviet Union and communism. What was the government's response to this fear, and what was the outcome of this response? Support your response with information from the lesson.

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

______