Question 3. OPEN BOOK. Identify Each Error in APA-Format. Don T Bother Reading, Just Look

Question 3. OPEN BOOK. Identify each error in APA-format. Don’t bother reading, just look at the format. State what should have done or correct the error.

Introduction

When reading, people create temporary, verbatim representations of the words in a text and a more durable, gist representation of the text’s meaning (Kintsch & van Dijk, 524). In this paper “Toward a model of text comprehension and production” Walter Kintsch and Jan van Dijk proved that there is a quick loss of the verbatim representation is not much of a problem because comprehension and even problem solving can proceed based on the gist representation. Detecting flaws in an argument and generating counter-arguments can require subtle distinctions of meaning (Kintsch and van Dijk, 525).

References

Barton, S.B., & Sanford, A.J. (1993). A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory and Cognition, 21, 477-487.

Larson, M., Britt, M.A., & Larson, A.A. (2004). Disfluencies in comprehending argumentative texts. Reading Psychology, 25(3), 205-224.

Lesgold, Alan, Roth, Stephen., & Curtis, Mary. (1979). Foregrounding effects in discourse comprehension. Journal of verbal learning & verbal behavior, 18(3), 291-308.

Long, D.L. & Lea, R.B. (2005). Have We Been Searching for Meaning in All the Wrong Places? Defining the "Search After Meaning" Principle in Comprehension, 39(2-3), 279-298.

MacDonald, M. C., Just, M., A., Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognition, 24, 56-98.

Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (2000). Tricks of memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol 9, 123-127.

Sachs, J.S. Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception & Psychophysics, 2(9), 437-442.