The University Of Texas At Austin
Annual Performance Appraisal
For Classified Personnel and non-teaching professional staff
For Appraisal Period Ending: / April 30, 2016
Employee Name:
Title:
Department:
OVERALL PURPOSE OF THE POSITION

RESI

B

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Rating System
Exceeds expectations: Performance consistently exceeds expectations.
Commendable: Performance exceeds expectations in some aspects of position.
Meets expectations: Performance met expectations and purpose of position.
Needs improvement: Performance is generally less than satisfactory in some aspects of position and requires improvement.
Did not meet expectations: Performance is consistently unsatisfactory and did not acceptably achieve the purpose of the position.
General Areas of Performance / APPRAISAL OF PERFORMANCE
Communication: Demonstrates listening skills and effectively communicates with customers whether in person, on the phone or in written correspondence. / Exceeds expectations Commendable Meets expectations Needs improvement Did not meet expectations
Customer Service: Demonstrates commitment to understanding and meeting customer expectations. / Exceeds expectations Commendable Meets expectations Needs improvement Did not meet expectations
Supervision required: Works independently and exercises good judgment in completing assignments / Exceeds expectations Commendable Meets expectations Needs improvement Did not meet expectations
Timeliness: Adheres to specified work schedule, is punctual in attending appointments, promptly responds to requests and inquiries. / Exceeds expectations Commendable Meets expectations Needs improvement Did not meet expectations
Initiative: Recognizes what needs to be done; responds effectively and in a timely manner. / Exceeds expectations Commendable Meets expectations Needs improvement Did not meet expectations
Team work: Shares information with others and helps build a team atmosphere. / Exceeds expectations Commendable Meets expectations Needs improvement Did not meet expectations
Productivity: Generates both high quality and quantity output in performing responsibilities. / Exceeds expectations Commendable Meets expectations Needs improvement Did not meet expectations
Resourcefulness: Demonstrates flexibility and creativity in effectively addressing both internal and external challenges. / Exceeds expectations Commendable Meets expectations Needs improvement Did not meet expectations
KEY RESPONSIBILITIES / APPRAISAL OF PERFORMANCE

IES

OVERALL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Exceeds expectations: Performance consistently exceeds expectations.
Commendable: Performance exceeds expectations in some aspects of position.
Meets expectations: Performance met expectations and purpose of the position.
Needs improvement: Performance is generally less than satisfactory in some aspects of position and requires improvement.
Did not meet expectations: Performance is consistently unsatisfactory and did not acceptably achieve the purpose of the position.
In the space above, please provide a rating and in the space below provide a summary of the employee’s overall performance. In determining the overall rating, please consider the ratings in each key responsibility and, if applicable, the percent time or weight of each key responsibility. If you are in MS Word, you can double-click a checkbox to place an X in it.
Please also note specific areas of performance where improvements can be made and describe the Performance Action Plan for addressing any performance deficiencies and the scheduled follow-up dates on the plan.
Summary:
GOALS
GOALS / COMMENTS

All jobs in the CFO portfolio are positions of Special Trust. For more info on Special Trust go to https://forms.security.utexas.edu/special_trust/about. Questions should be directed to the Information Security Office ().

supervisor/APPRAISER Information
Name of Appraiser/Supervisor:
Title / Signature: / Date:
REVIEW BY ONE LEVEL UP FROM SUPERVISOR/APPRAISER
Name:
Title / Signature: / Date:
DIRECTOR rEVIEW
Name:
Title / Signature: / Date:
EMPLOYEE Information
I understand that I have the option to add my own comments to this appraisal and/or seek resolution through the university’s grievance procedure. Comments are submitted in writing with a dated signature and must be received within two weeks of the performance appraisal discussion. The comments are presented to the supervisor (or to CBO-CFO, who will provide a copy to the supervisor). Comments will be attached to the appraisal and retained in the personnel file. For information concerning the university’s grievance procedure, contact CBO-CFO or Human Resource Services. The university’s grievance policy can be viewed here: http://www.utexas.edu/policies/hoppm/07.c.01.html
Name of Employee:
Title: / Signature:
This performance appraisal was discussed with me on: / (date)

4 | Page