2004 SACS / COC Meeting

Professional Development Session 10

The New Role of Accreditation Liaison

Dr. Donna K. Wilkinson, Associate Executive Director, SACS/COC

Ms. Patricia Hardeman, Accreditation Liaison, Wesleyan College, Macon, GA

Dr. Kenneth W. Spackman, Accreditation Liaison, UNC-Wilmington, NC

Donna Wilkinson

·  Accreditation Liaison is a mandatory assignment for member institution under the new Principles

·  Someone other than institutional CEO

Patricia Hardeman

·  Umbrella of integrity rules everything

·  Remember your name goes on the document the institution submits to SACS

·  Three important areas in the Accreditation Liaison role

o  Preparing

o  Planning

o  Coordination

·  Preparing

o  Preparing constituencies

§  Yourself

·  Attend SACS/COC national meeting

·  Read and understand the Principles

·  Know basic steps in the process and the timeline

·  Become with all the materials provided in both Handbooks (for the institution and for the reviewers)

·  Review accreditation websites of 2004 cohort

·  Study the SACS website, esp. section on SACS/COC policies and position statements

§  Institution

·  Orient the campus community through faculty meetings, Senate meetings

·  Work with the CEO to carefully select the members of the Leadership Team (“workhorses” and those who have knowledge needed)

·  Develop institutional master calendar for the reaccredidation process (work backwards from 12/2008)

·  Develop an administrative budget to ensure that we have budget to cover travel, fees, books, offsite review, onsite visit, etc

·  Identify dedicated space to work

·  Develop a long-term schedule of committee and team meetings with dedicated time

§  Leadership Team

·  Each member needs to have knowledge of accreditation history of the institution

·  Know and have common understanding all the components of core requirements and comprehensive standards (pay attention to each word in requirements and standards)

·  Develop and assign duties and responsibilities within the Leadership Team (e.g., compliance certification, QEP, website + identify a recorder)

·  Make sure the members put the travel they will need to do on their calendars (e.g., SACS Annual Meetings, SACS orientation for the Leadership Team, SACS Summer Institute)

·  Planning with the Leadership Team

o  Help them to understand and develop

§  Strategies to address and accomplish the compliance audit

§  List of documents / evidence needed. Tip: Have as many documents in electronic format as possible (make sure you indicate the number of the document version, e.g., “version5”)

o  Identify due dates and persons responsible for specific items and issues

o  Design strategy to develop the QEP

§  Study institutional research / assessment data, esp. related to student learning (Remember: student learning is a key component of the whole reaffirmation process)

·  Student satisfaction data

·  Student performance data

§  Identify strengths and weaknesses as related to student learning

§  Initiate campus discussion based on the key strengths and weaknesses. Seek their input

§  Study the input and identify the focused theme for the QEP

·  Coordination

o  You must regularly attend committee and subcommittee meetings

o  “Do gentle little nudge” if someone is lagging behind

o  Make sure that you communicate with your SACS staff liaison on a regular basis

o  Plan early for your on-site visit

o  Adhere to the timeline you developed

o  Develop a checklist of all the task need to be accomplished. Remember you sign-off on the Compliance Certification and QEP

Donna Wilkinson

·  Umbrella of integrity

·  Ensure the integrity of the documents

·  Regularly revise the SACS/COC website for updates (esp. a couple of weeks after June and December COC meetings)

Kenneth Spackman

Ongoing Duties of Accreditation Liaison

·  Institutional Profile reporting

·  Serving as Campus Information Resource Person for SACS

·  Substantive Change Reporting

·  Institutional Profile Reports. SACS Liaison is responsible for coordination of the completion and timely submission of Institutional Profile reports

o  Two kinds of annual SACS requests for Institutional Profile reports

§  Late Fall

·  Enrollment

§  Late Spring (June)

·  Revenues, expenditures, assets, liabilities

·  Campus Information Resource Person for SACS and campus constituencies

o  Maintain a central location for SACS documents, policies, records of correspondence, copies of reports, SACS publications, etc.

o  Serve as a contact persons for questions from SACS and campus constituencies

o  Know new policies that are developed on campus and ensure that are aligned with SACS requirements

o  Remember that you are responsible for familiarizing the campus with the implications of new Principles

§  What the impact will be

§  What changes need to be done

§  What kind of documents need to be collected

o  Incorporate Principles in strategic planning, evaluation, assessment

o  Remember to look not just for best practices but also think about the best fit for the campus culture

·  Substantive Change Reporting (least understood responsibility of SACS liaison)

o  Examples of Substantive Change

§  Dual-degree program in consortium arrangements

§  Establishing a branch campus

§  New programs at a more advanced level

§  Changing program delivery mode (e.g., offering online program)

§  Extension programs

o  Review SACS policy on Substantive Change http://www.sacscoc.org/pdf/sub%20change%20final.pdf and SACS presentation http://www.sacscoc.org/annmtg/presentations/CS-6%20Substantive%20Change.pdf

o  Substantive Change reports range from 20 minutes to 20 months – study the policy!

o  Do not assume that Deans and Department Heads are aware of the policy

Donna Wilkinson

Appropriate Format for the Reports Sent to SACS

·  In Compliance Certification, Focused and Response Reports use past tense – emphasize what the institution has done so far to support its claim of compliance and/or address the concerns of the reviewers. Only if you can not make the case for compliance, describe your plans

·  Keep the writing clear and concise. The winner is not the institution that submits most pages, but the institution that documents its compliance most efficiently

·  Remember your audience – commission members are busy people. If your report is clear and concise, you will be very well appreciated

·  Package reports appropriately

o  Do Not Use Ring Binders

o  Use spiral bind or paper cover with prongs

o  Read the Guidelines

·  Include only relevant information (e.g., do not include 8-page summary of the board meeting, if only 2 sentence section matters)

·  If you have electronic Catalog, submit a print copy

·  How much data do we need to demonstrate compliance?

o  Faculty qualifications

§  At least one academic year prior to Compliance Certification

o  Assessment

§  Demonstrate ongoing nature of assessment

§  At least three years

§  Demonstrate use of results and document improvements

§  But don’t overload report, put the trend data on CD or website

University Assessment Advisory Committee (UAAC)

Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment

2/20/2005