E911BOARD

MEETINGMINUTES

Meeting Dates:

E911 Board Meetings

May 14-15, 2014

Embassy Suites Hotel

Altamonte Springs

Wednesday, May 14, 2014 and Thursday, May 15, 2014beginning time 9:00 a.m. until conclusion of business

Board Members in meeting attendance:

Carolyn Dill-Collier, 911 Coordinator, St. Lucie County

John Ford, Chairman – Bureau Chief, DMS - Division of Telecommunications

Charles “Chuck” Freeman, 911 Coordinator, Pinellas County

Stan Greer, Area Manager – External Affairs, AT&T

Benjamin “Ben” Guthrie, 911 Coordinator, Gulf County

Sandra “Sandy” Khazraee, Regulatory Affairs Director, Southern Region, Century Link

David “Dave” Konuch, Attorney, Florida Cable Telecommunications Association

Dale Mitchell, 911 Coordinator, St. Johns County

Tom Nadler, Manager, Sprint

Ira Pyles, 911 Coordinator, Hillsborough County

Staff in meeting attendance:

Wink Infinger, Statewide 911 Coordinator, DMS-Division of Telecommunications

Clark Jennings, Legal Counsel, Office of the Attorney General

Penney Taylor, Administrative Support, DMS-Division of Telecommunications

E911 Board Meeting051414

Page Two

Public in meeting attendance:

Derek Alvarez, Frequentis

Mike Barretto, Word Systems

Melanie Becker, CenturyLink

Vince Bonvento, Palm Beach County

Silas Daniel, Sumter County

Peggy DeFilippo, NexGen Global Technology

Ford Frey, CenturyLink

Keith Godwin, Alachua County

David Gleason, TCS (formerly MicroData)

Ed Gonzalez, Intrado

Tim Gundlach, TGRA

Greg Holcomb, Lake County

Sally Jackson, Polk County

Doug Kesser, TCS

Nicole Leonard, Intrado

Darren Light, AT&T

Don Nagle, L.R. Kimball

Susan Nelson, Cassidian

Tim Roberts, Carousel

James Robinson, AK Associates

Annette Rodgers, Orange County

Chuck Spalding, Palm Beach County

Dina Walker, Seminole County

Alan Woods, Intrado

Staff Members and Public Members participating viatelephone conference:

Laurie Anderson, Charlotte County

Jeff Barbacci, Thomas Howell Ferguson, P.A.

Kimberly Bickley, Administrative Support, DMS-Division of Telecommunications

Amelia Coates, Sarasota

Christine Cooper, Okaloosa County

Tricia Davis, Volusia County

Ray Eslinger, Nassau County

Belinda Farmer, Walton County

Bob Finney, Collier County

Adrienne Jones, Administrative Support, DMS-Division of Telecommunications

Donald Lamb, Technical Support, DMS-Division of Telecommunications

Stacy Needham, Manatee County

E911 Board Meeting051414

Page Three

Staff Members and Public Members participating via telephone conference (continued):

Jennifer Payne, Suwannee County

Chris Polischuck, Thomas Howell Ferguson, P.A.

Rolf Preuss, Flagler County

Kent Raheb, Technical Support, DMS-Division of Telecommunications

Vanessa Thompson, Putnam County

Mike West, Levy County

(Some telephone conference participants may not be listed as no email was received acknowledging their participation.)

Wednesday, May 14, 2014 beginning at 9:00 a.m.until conclusion of business

1.Call to Order

Meeting called to order at approximately 9:00 a.m.

The meeting started with staff conducting roll call. All current Board members were present for this meeting with the exception of Mr. Pyles who would be late due to other conflicts.

Roll call for staff members was conducted. Public members attending this meeting and participating in the telephone conference were requested to acknowledge their participation by signing the sign in sheet or by sending an email to staff to assure that they would be properly noted in the meeting minutes. Public members with issue(s) to be presented to the Board for consideration were requested to either list it on the issue(s) list provided or to send the issue(s) via electronic mail to staff.

2.Approve Meeting Minutes for the April 16-17, 2014 E911 Board Meetings

Meeting minutes from the April 16-17, 2014E911 Board meetings were reviewed by the Board. There were no significant changes or updates received from the Board members or staff after the initial draft was circulated. All updates were incorporated in the draft meeting minutes as presented.

Ms. Mitchell made a motion to adopt the April 16-17, 2014 as presented. Ms. Dill-Collier seconded the motion that carried9-0. Mr. Pyles was not available for this vote.

Meeting Agenda Overview

Mr. Ford gave an overview of the meeting agenda and the items listed for discussion.

E911 Board Meeting051414

Page Four

3.Old Business

Board Member Appointments

Mr. Ford informed the Board that there has been no new updates related to any Board appointments and that the Board is still awaiting notice from the Governor’s Appointment Office.

Mr. Ford informed the Board that there still was only one name submitted for the vacant wireless seat, therefore, the appeal goes out once again that if there are any interest candidates to please submit the name to the Governor’s Appoint Office.

Ms. Taylor informed the Board that she had been told by the Governor’s Appointment Office that efforts would be made to announce some appointments on Friday, May 16, 2014.

4.Discuss confidential data related to provider revenues by county, discrepancies,

disbursements and provider invoices. All confidential information discussed in a manner as not to disclose any confidential information and/or trade secrets.

Mr. Polischuck reviewed confidential data related to the wireless and non-wireless February 28, 2014 monthly disbursements to counties and financial statements.

The Board was informed that issues continue to be encountered with remittance reports from some companies and with fluctuations of subscribers from some companies.

5.Discuss the recommendation(s) and vote on items from confidential data

Wireless

Wireless financial reports for the period ending February 28, 2014 were reviewed and discussed by the Board.

Mr. Freeman made a motion to authorize distribution of wireless revenues in the amount of $3,799,247.06. Mr. Guthrie seconded the motion that carried 9-0. Mr. Pyles was not available for this vote.

Nonwireless

Nonwireless financial reports for the period ending February 28, 2014 were reviewed and discussed by the Board.

Mr. Guthrie made a motion to authorize distribution of nonwireless revenues in the amount of $3,384,736.08. Mr. Nadler seconded the motion which carried 9-0. Mr. Pyles was not available for this vote.

E911 Board Meeting051414

Page Five

Discuss the recommendation(s) and vote on items from confidential data (continued)

Financial Statement

Mr. Barbacci gave an overview of financials for the period ending February 28, 2014 which included a summary of liabilities, deposits and pooled investments, trust fund balance, revenues, expenditures and subsequent events.

Provider Cost Recovery Reimbursement

Mr. Barbacci gave an overview of the statement for Provider Cost Recovery Reimbursements.

Letters to Service Providers

Mr. Ford informed the Board that letters continue to be sent to service providers with issues related to their remittance reports.

Wireless Service Provider Cost Recovery Consent Agenda

The following wireless service provider cost reimbursement invoice(s) were reviewed for payment authorization:

Mr. Freeman made a motion that payment authorization for Item 1, as listed on the Wireless Service Provider Cost Recovery Consent Agenda in the total amount of $7,475.94 be approved. Mr. Guthrie seconded the motion that carried 9-0. Mr. Pyles was not available for this vote.

Mr. Freeman made a motion that payment authorization for Item 2, as listed on the Wireless Service Provider Cost Recovery Consent Agenda in the total amount of $292,812.74 be approved. Mr. Guthrie seconded the motion that carried 9-0. Mr. Pyles was not available for this vote.

Mr. Freeman made a motion that payment authorization for Item 3, as listed on the Wireless Service Provider Cost Recovery Consent Agenda in the total amount of $22,915.40be approved. Ms. Mitchell seconded the motion that carried 9-0. Mr. Pyles was not available for this vote.

Mr. Nadler filed Form 8A.

Other issue(s) discussed:

  • FemtoCell

The Board discussed FemtoCell and explained that this technology is a small, low-power cellular base station, typically designed for use in a home or small business. It connects to the service provider’s network via broadband (such as DSL or cable); current designs typically support two to four active mobile phones in a residential setting, and eight to 16 active mobile phones in enterprise settings. A femtocell allows service providers to extend service coverage indoors or at the cell edge, especially where access would otherwise be limited or unavailable.

  • Future Wireless Service Provider Cost Recovery Proposals and New Technologies

E911 Board Meeting051414

Page Six

6.Rural County 2014 Spring Program Application Review and Prioritization and vote on grant award(s)

The following grant applications tabled from the April 2014 Board meeting were discussed:

Priority 4a

DixieE911 System Upgrade $54,402.67

GladesE911 System Upgrade $59,460.69

HardeeE911 System Upgrade $132,999.60

JeffersonE911 System Upgrade $27,818.35

LevyE911 System Upgrade $123,943.57

Priority 4d

HardeeRecorder Replacement $14,903.00

Priority 4e

BakerDBMS Software Upgrade $5,000.00

Priority 6b

GilchristE911 Map Service $9,200.00

Mr. Ford informed the Board that the letter to the Department of Financial Services (DFS)

requesting immediate payment for the initial approved Rural grant awards in the amount of

$987,299.46 had been complete and that the checks should be processed within the next 2 weeks.

Other issue(s) discussed:

  • Funding of remaining grants (future grant program funds or administrative)
  • Loss of revenue due to legislation estimates
  • Loss of revenue impact to counties
  • Notice to the Department of Revenue

Discussion related to these grants was tabled in an effort to allowcounty representatives to be available to support the grant needs and for staff to prepare grant totals for potential votes.

FirstNet Update

Mr. Ford requested that Mr. Holcomb, Lake County provide an update on FirstNet and where

911 fit within this technology.

Lunch Recess

E911 Board Meeting051414

Page Seven

Palm Beach County Presentation

Presenters:Chuck Spalding, 911 Coordinator

Vince Bonvento, Public Safety Director

Mr. Spalding presented the Palm Beach County Transitioning NG-911 PowerPoint Presentation to

the Board. Mr. Spalding also provided a grant project completion status to the Board.

7.Discuss Rural County and State Grant Program Quarterly Reports and Change Requests

Hendry County 12-10-32

Hendry County submitted a change request form requesting a three month time extension to close out grant paper work.

Mr. Freeman made a motion to accept the Hendry County change request. Ms. Dill-Collier

seconded the motion that carried 9-0. Mr. Pyles was not available for this vote.

Suwannee County S4-11-07-36

Suwannee County submitted a memorandum of information to the Board informing that the

county anticipated refunding grant funds in the approximate amount of $141,339.25.

8.Discuss 2014 E911 State Grant Program

Mr. Infinger reviewed with the Board suggested modifications for the State Grant Program

application. The effective date for the State grant application is proposed as September

1, 2014.

Legislative Update

Jim Smith, CenturyLink, Lobbyist provide an update to the Board on the 2014 Legislative Session E911 Legislation. Mr. Smith informed the Board that the bill had passed the Senate and House and since has been submitted to the Governor. If signed into law the bill would be effective January 1, 2015.

Mr. Smith acknowledged all support received (which included Sally Jackson) with the passing of the E911 legislation.

Mr. Pyles joined the meeting during these discussions.

Other issue(s) discussed:

Reverse impact for rural counties

Florida Retail Federation interest in Board seat

E911 Board Meeting051414

Page Eight

Discuss 2014 E911 State Grant Program (continued)

Ms. Khazraee made a motion to initiate Rule Development for the State Grant Program

application. Mr. Guthrie seconded the motion which carried unanimously (10-0).

State Grant Rule Development

Mr. Infinger reviewed proposed modifications for the State Grant Program Rule with the Board.

Mr. Freeman made a motion to authorize staff to initiate Rule Development for the State Grant Program Rule. Mr. Guthrie seconded the motion which carried unanimously (10-0).

Other issue(s) discussed:

Hosted Services

Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs (SERC)

Mr. Jennings informed the Board that the SERC would not be required until the final language is prepared.

Mr. Nadler made a motion that the current language as presented by staff for the State Grant Program Application and Rule be accepted effective with the signing of the bill by the Governor be noticed for Rule Development. Ms. Mitchell seconded the motion which carried unanimously (10-0).

Ms. Dill Collier made a motion to accept the SERC (which did not create any regulatory impact to the counties) as presented. Mr. Konuch seconded the motion which carried unanimously (10-0).

Mr. Jennings informed the Board that if the Governor vetoed the bill the language for the State Grant Program application and rule would not be valid and some language would need to be stricken. Mr. Jennings questioned what would be the desire of the Board.

Mr. Ford stated that the motion just made was based on the premise that the legislation would be adopted; if it is not, would the Board agree with instructing Counsel to move forward with rule development minus the elements strictly based on the new legislation.

Mr. Freeman agreed to form motion as stated by Mr. Ford. Mr. Nadler seconded the motion which carried unanimously (10-0).

Mr. Ford called for a motion of agreement that the SERC is not impacted by removing language that was in the rule based on the statutory language.

Ms. Dill-Collier moved. Mr. Konuch seconded the motion which carried unanimously (10-0).

E911 Board Meeting051414

Page Nine

2014 Legislation Possible Impact & Action Presentation

Mr. Infinger provided a presentation to the Board related to the 2014 E911 Legislation and the possible impact and action for review and consideration.

Issue(s) discussed:

Utilization of Funds

Auditing

Carry Forward Use

Annual Reporting

Meeting Recessed

E911 Board Meeting051514

Page Ten

Thursday, May 15. 2014 beginning time 9:00 a.m. until conclusion of business

Meeting reconvened with staff acknowledging Board members in attendance for this meeting. Mr. Nadler was not available for this meeting due to other conflicts.

Public members attending this meeting and participating in the telephone conference that did not participate on Wednesday were requested to acknowledge their participation by signing the sign in sheet or by sending an email to staff to assure that they would be properly noted in the meeting minutes.

9.Intrado Text-to-911 Presentation (TXT29-1-1)

Presenter: Nichole Leonard

TeleCommunication Systems (TCS) Presentation

Presenter: Doug Kesser

10.Discuss Fee Allocation Percentages and the Emergency Communications Number E911 System Fund (E911 Trust Fund)

Mr. Ford questioned if anyone on the conference or in meeting that desired to discuss the fee

allocations percentages. There was no response.

Mr. Ford stated that with the understanding that there could be declining revenues forthcoming

that at this time no discussions were needed until more information was available.

Rural County 2014 Spring Program Application Review and Prioritization and vote on

grant award(s) – continued

Mr. Ford started discussions by informing the Board that letters for awards through Priority 3

had been submitted to the Department of Management Services, Financial Management Services

for processing.

Mr. Ford asked if any counties were on the telephone conference to discuss their grant needs

with the Board. Glades, Hardee and Levy counties responded as being on the telephone

conference.

Ms. Khazraee stated that it appeared that the system upgrades (priority 4a) were primary to

PSAP and questioned if delay in funding (until State Grant Program) would create issues for the

county. Glades, Hardee and Levy counties responded that they would be okay until the next

State Grant Program.

E911 Board Meeting051514

Page Eleven

Rural County 2014 Spring Program Application Review and Prioritization and vote on

grant award(s) – continued

Other issue(s) discussed:

Issues with County Commission approval to resubmit grant request (none)

Should Board have grant funding cut-off or continue trying to find funds from other sources

Increase in Rural County grant percentage allocations

Mr. Greer made a motion to not fund the 2014 Spring Rural County grants request below Priority 3. Ms. Mitchell seconded the motion which carried 8-0. Mr. Guthrie and Mr. Nadler were not available for this vote.

11.Discuss Rural County 2014 Fall Program

Mr. Infinger started these discussions with the review of work in progress information related to

methodology for a special disbursement for maintenance only.

The Board is of the consensus that the general move should be that the Board should continue

moving toward an allowance type program for maintenance and make the Rural County Grant

Program more for system replacement, next generation application and networks.

Mr. Ford stated that the Board would look to the counties for input from the county’s view as

how to best implement this program.

Other issue(s) discussed:

County Information

The Board reviewed annual report information for the rural count grant program related to the total 911 calls and wireless 911 calls reported per year, PSAPs and system types, number of call taking positions and the number of call takers, along with county population.

Utilization of Funds for Annual Audits

Mr. Ford informed the Board and county representatives that it was the interpretation of the Inspector General that the E911 funds could be utilized for required annual audits.

Mr. Ford stated that for the 2014 Fall Rural County grant program that the program not suddenly

stop providing maintenance. Mr. Infinger suggested that the Board wait until the prepaid

revenues start coming in which could be the Fall of 2015 before any changes are made to the

program. Ms. Khazraee agreed with Mr. Infinger’s suggestion.

Mr. Infinger informed the Board that related to the 2014 Fall Rural County grant program the

Board has two options at this time. (1) would be to leave the program as it is and (2) would be to

make the program the similar to the State grant program. This methodology would add in the

remotely hosted equipment and still have the Spring and Fall grant schedules.

E911 Board Meeting051514

Page Twelve

Discuss Rural County 2014 Fall Program (continued)

Other issue(s) discussed:

Updates to task and deliverables

Vendor quotes need to include all information

Certification of grant project completion

Rule Development for Spring 2015 Rule County Grant Program