1

Week 11 Online Class Activity: Red Team

StudentA: we need to decide quickly. we should be on the next step already Mar 22, 2004 11:30:21 AM EST

StudentB: OK. I am going to work as secretary. Mar 22, 2004 11:31:24 AM EST

StudentA: roger that Mar 22, 2004 11:31:30 AM EST

StudentC: Sorry for the late responses Mar 22, 2004 11:31:34 AM EST

StudentA: that leaves Team leader for StudentC Mar 22, 2004 11:31:45 AM EST

StudentA: Is Steve out there somewhere? Mar 22, 2004 11:32:35 AM EST

StudentA: We need a white board drawer Mar 22, 2004 11:33:03 AM EST

StudentA: Why don't I take Team leader also and StudentC can be white board drawer? Mar 22, 2004 11:33:47 AM EST

StudentC: Ok Mar 22, 2004 11:34:12 AM EST

StudentA: Lets begin by identifying possible arguments Mar 22, 2004 11:34:53 AM EST

StudentA: everyone give us one Mar 22, 2004 11:35:18 AM EST

StudentB: you mean supporting or opposing one? Mar 22, 2004 11:35:27 AM EST

StudentA: supporting arguements first Mar 22, 2004 11:35:47 AM EST

StudentA: collaborative tools can serve a knowledge management function Mar 22, 2004 11:36:44 AM EST

StudentA: we need to move faster Mar 22, 2004 11:38:15 AM EST

StudentA: ten minutes remain in this phase Mar 22, 2004 11:38:43 AM EST

StudentC: Is my role drawing the arguments? Mar 22, 2004 11:38:53 AM EST

StudentA: yes Mar 22, 2004 11:38:57 AM EST

StudentA: just write them down for now Mar 22, 2004 11:39:10 AM EST

StudentA: this is a brainstorming session Mar 22, 2004 11:39:24 AM EST

StudentA: learning togethjer is better than learning alone Mar 22, 2004 11:40:26 AM EST

StudentA: just write them down, diagram later Mar 22, 2004 11:41:17 AM EST

StudentB: There is the evidence in the textbook, (Johnson and hohnson,1990) Mar 22, 2004 11:41:23 AM EST

StudentB: I mean learning together... Mar 22, 2004 11:41:42 AM EST

StudentA: we need more supporting arguments Mar 22, 2004 11:42:37 AM EST

StudentA: so far we have two Mar 22, 2004 11:42:49 AM EST

StudentA: small group discussions have a larger positive effect than individual assignments Mar 22, 2004 11:43:27 AM EST

StudentA: positive effects on prior knowledge and subsequent learning Mar 22, 2004 11:44:29 AM EST

StudentA: maximizes interactions among all participants Mar 22, 2004 11:45:03 AM EST

StudentA: five minutes left Mar 22, 2004 11:45:13 AM EST

StudentA: I think we have five arguments. lets get them on the whiteboard Mar 22, 2004 11:48:07 AM EST

StudentA: one minute remains Mar 22, 2004 11:49:51 AM EST

StudentA: Lets begin phase 2 Mar 22, 2004 11:50:41 AM EST

StudentA: lets organize these ARGs in a hierarchical diagram Mar 22, 2004 11:52:09 AM EST

StudentA: what do you guys think? Mar 22, 2004 11:52:50 AM EST

StudentB: I think leaning together... is similar to small group has large effect... Mar 22, 2004 11:54:29 AM EST

StudentA: yes, I think so too Mar 22, 2004 11:54:51 AM EST

StudentB: I mean two ARGs are the same. Mar 22, 2004 11:54:55 AM EST

StudentA: maybe one is a subarg of the other? Mar 22, 2004 11:55:18 AM EST

StudentC: right Mar 22, 2004 11:56:00 AM EST

StudentA: which one is the main arg? Mar 22, 2004 11:56:20 AM EST

StudentC: small group is the subarg Mar 22, 2004 11:56:22 AM EST

StudentB: And also it has evidence. Mar 22, 2004 11:56:39 AM EST

StudentA: ok, lets put them in a diagram that reflects this Mar 22, 2004 11:57:04 AM EST

StudentC: does anyone know how I can relocate the boxes? Mar 22, 2004 11:59:38 AM EST

StudentA: did you figure it out? Mar 22, 2004 12:00:21 PM EST

StudentC: not yet Mar 22, 2004 12:00:31 PM EST

StudentC: the box moves but the text does not Mar 22, 2004 12:00:49 PM EST

StudentA: click on the tool to the far left Mar 22, 2004 12:01:08 PM EST

StudentA: both the box and text can move Mar 22, 2004 12:01:25 PM EST

StudentB: I think this is collaboration Mar 22, 2004 12:01:52 PM EST

StudentA: put the four main ARGs across the top and the subarg below Mar 22, 2004 12:02:07 PM EST

StudentA: reduce box size Mar 22, 2004 12:02:53 PM EST

StudentA: lets make this a converging diagram Mar 22, 2004 12:05:04 PM EST

StudentA: lets put the main point at the bottom, and the supporting arguments above it Mar 22, 2004 12:05:37 PM EST

StudentC: I think I got it Mar 22, 2004 12:06:16 PM EST

StudentC: Now give me directions Mar 22, 2004 12:06:24 PM EST

StudentA: Main Point: Use Online Collaborative Learning Mar 22, 2004 12:07:37 PM EST

StudentB: from small group to learning toghether is bether Mar 22, 2004 12:07:41 PM EST

StudentA: we have seven minutes remaining Mar 22, 2004 12:08:25 PM EST

StudentA: use a blue color font for ARGs Mar 22, 2004 12:09:52 PM EST

StudentA: looking good. can we reduce the font size? Mar 22, 2004 12:10:32 PM EST

StudentA: five minutes Mar 22, 2004 12:10:59 PM EST

StudentC: Sorry we cannot reduce the font size Mar 22, 2004 12:13:17 PM EST

StudentA: don't type so many words across Mar 22, 2004 12:15:17 PM EST

StudentC: I think Positive effect on prior knowledge is related to learning together Mar 22, 2004 12:15:30 PM EST

StudentC: wht do you think' Mar 22, 2004 12:15:39 PM EST

StudentA: make the boxes wider, not longer Mar 22, 2004 12:15:56 PM EST

StudentA: time is up, break time Mar 22, 2004 12:16:22 PM EST

StudentA: learn from these guys, save our work Mar 22, 2004 12:16:55 PM EST

StudentC: HEy all make sure do not use the duster erases everythink Mar 22, 2004 12:19:09 PM EST

StudentA: lets begin phase 3 Mar 22, 2004 12:27:37 PM EST

StudentA: we need evidence, principles & assumptions Mar 22, 2004 12:28:34 PM EST

StudentA: evidence in green Mar 22, 2004 12:28:50 PM EST

StudentA: principles in yellow Mar 22, 2004 12:28:58 PM EST

StudentA: assumptions in orange Mar 22, 2004 12:29:10 PM EST

StudentB: As I said, learning together has a evidence Mar 22, 2004 12:29:27 PM EST

StudentA: StudentB, you list all evidence Mar 22, 2004 12:29:37 PM EST

StudentB: Ok. Mar 22, 2004 12:29:48 PM EST

StudentA: I will list principles and assumptions Mar 22, 2004 12:30:02 PM EST

StudentA: StudentC, you diagram Mar 22, 2004 12:30:10 PM EST

StudentC: O>k Mar 22, 2004 12:30:25 PM EST

StudentB: and also, I think knowlege management is related with consturctivism Mar 22, 2004 12:30:30 PM EST

StudentA: find us evidence Mar 22, 2004 12:31:00 PM EST

StudentC: I think what we have as a subarg is the evidence Mar 22, 2004 12:31:17 PM EST

StudentA: no, the evidence is Schmidt & Moust, 2000 Mar 22, 2004 12:32:21 PM EST

StudentC: evidence for what is schmith & Moust, 2000??? Mar 22, 2004 12:34:13 PM EST

StudentA: Assumption: both collaboration & structure contribute to better learning Mar 22, 2004 12:34:59 PM EST

StudentC: which color you want the assumptions Mar 22, 2004 12:35:42 PM EST

StudentA: small group's positive effect Mar 22, 2004 12:35:54 PM EST

StudentA: orange Mar 22, 2004 12:36:16 PM EST

StudentA: Assumption: Learning through knowledge exchange is a valuable feature of online learning Mar 22, 2004 12:37:56 PM EST

StudentA: Principle: the degree of learner concurrency in your training environment should dictate which collaborative tool you should use Mar

22, 2004 12:40:45 PM EST

StudentA: Principle in yellow Mar 22, 2004 12:40:58 PM EST

StudentA: diagram is looking good Mar 22, 2004 12:41:16 PM EST

StudentC: can you tell me the brief description of what you said Mar 22, 2004 12:41:39 PM EST

StudentA: Principle: Training goals should influence the type of collaborative tools you use Mar 22, 2004 12:42:44 PM EST

StudentA: five minutes remain in phase 3 Mar 22, 2004 12:45:03 PM EST

StudentB: far right green box is the evidence of positve effect on prior knowlege Mar 22, 2004 12:46:03 PM EST

StudentC: I gues we will have a problem of haviong difficulty on locating things Mar 22, 2004 12:47:34 PM EST

StudentA: why? Mar 22, 2004 12:47:46 PM EST

StudentA: connect what we have now to their right ARGs Mar 22, 2004 12:48:50 PM EST

StudentA: one minute Mar 22, 2004 12:49:16 PM EST

StudentB: Jonassen... is the evidence of Max interaction Mar 22, 2004 12:49:52 PM EST

StudentA: lets stop with the evidence and auumptions, etc... and diagram what we have Mar 22, 2004 12:51:01 PM EST

StudentC: Ok Mar 22, 2004 12:52:10 PM EST

StudentC: Please tell me where should we put the principles and assumpt Mar 22, 2004 12:52:42 PM EST

StudentA: connect the orabnge on the far leaft to learning together Mar 22, 2004 12:53:55 PM EST

StudentA: connect the second orange to max interaction Mar 22, 2004 12:55:19 PM EST

StudentA: top yellow to knowledge management Mar 22, 2004 12:56:47 PM EST

StudentA: bottom yellow to positive effect Mar 22, 2004 12:57:38 PM EST

StudentA: StudentB, start listing opposing agruments Mar 22, 2004 12:58:21 PM EST

StudentA: looking good StudentC Mar 22, 2004 12:59:16 PM EST

StudentC: StudentA Mar 22, 2004 1:00:47 PM EST

StudentA: yes? Mar 22, 2004 1:00:55 PM EST

StudentC: Don't look around!!!! Mar 22, 2004 1:01:01 PM EST

StudentA: we have fifteen minutes remaining in phase 4 Mar 22, 2004 1:01:35 PM EST

StudentB: Collaboration tool may make learners confuse because of so much information Mar 22, 2004 1:01:44 PM EST

StudentA: opposing ARG in red Mar 22, 2004 1:02:07 PM EST

StudentB: And also, what if students' interaction have nothing to do with its subject? Mar 22, 2004 1:03:21 PM EST

StudentC: Shoe I do not think what you said is possible Mar 22, 2004 1:03:54 PM EST

StudentB: And how to make learners participate in interaction actively? Mar 22, 2004 1:04:10 PM EST

StudentC: I mean how it can confuse Mar 22, 2004 1:04:11 PM EST

StudentA: online collaboration tools are subject to communication failures Mar 22, 2004 1:04:28 PM EST

StudentA: lets get these down in red Mar 22, 2004 1:05:14 PM EST

StudentB: students could think of chatting as an entertainment. Mar 22, 2004 1:06:00 PM EST

StudentB: Not as a studying tool. Mar 22, 2004 1:06:21 PM EST

StudentA: people have different levels of computer expertise & experience Mar 22, 2004 1:06:33 PM EST

StudentA: different computers may not be compatible Mar 22, 2004 1:07:07 PM EST

StudentC: StudentA your issue is related to which arg? Mar 22, 2004 1:07:59 PM EST

StudentA: which issue? Mar 22, 2004 1:08:12 PM EST

StudentA: knowledge management for the communication failure issue Mar 22, 2004 1:08:58 PM EST

StudentA: five minute remain in phase 4 Mar 22, 2004 1:10:06 PM EST

StudentA: post no more issues. diagram what we have Mar 22, 2004 1:10:36 PM EST

StudentB: I think technical problem issue needs extra place Mar 22, 2004 1:13:53 PM EST

StudentB: I mean it is not related to any ARGs. Mar 22, 2004 1:14:32 PM EST

StudentA: StudentB, read Phase 5. Mar 22, 2004 1:15:07 PM EST

StudentB: OK Mar 22, 2004 1:16:14 PM EST

StudentA: lets begin phase 5 while StudentC finishes the diagram Mar 22, 2004 1:16:44 PM EST

StudentC: I agree on the issue of raising the technical difficulties Mar 22, 2004 1:16:45 PM EST

StudentB: StudentA, did you said communication failure is related to knowlege management? Mar 22, 2004 1:16:52 PM EST

StudentB: StudentC, I do not mean that technical difficulties was irrelevant. Mar 22, 2004 1:17:35 PM EST

StudentC: Also different level among the learners is an important issue deserve a special consideration Mar 22, 2004 1:17:41 PM EST

StudentA: no collaboration with communication failure Mar 22, 2004 1:18:39 PM EST

StudentA: we need to move on to phase 5 Mar 22, 2004 1:18:55 PM EST

StudentC: I mean technical expertise and experience on using the computers and the design tools Mar 22, 2004 1:19:03 PM EST

StudentB: I think communication failure is more related to max interaction Mar 22, 2004 1:19:13 PM EST

StudentC: I am in the phase 5 Mar 22, 2004 1:19:24 PM EST

StudentC: I agree it is also related to max interaction Mar 22, 2004 1:20:07 PM EST

StudentA: it is related to both. good job Mar 22, 2004 1:20:39 PM EST

StudentC: Another limitation is about the limitation of the tools Mar 22, 2004 1:21:05 PM EST

StudentB: the white board is too small. Mar 22, 2004 1:21:43 PM EST

StudentA: No more limitations. We need to list strengths and weaknesses of this activity for StudentB Mar 22, 2004 1:21:56 PM EST

StudentC: i.e interestingly we are not able to copy and paste the text etc Mar 22, 2004 1:22:17 PM EST

StudentA: Weakness: One team member was AWOL Mar 22, 2004 1:22:52 PM EST

StudentB: What AWOL means? Mar 22, 2004 1:23:53 PM EST

StudentC: Strength: Being able to communicate from different locations Mar 22, 2004 1:23:55 PM EST

StudentA: Strength: Everyone participated Mar 22, 2004 1:24:01 PM EST

StudentA: Absent without Leave Mar 22, 2004 1:24:21 PM EST

StudentA: Strength: We had a good internet connection Mar 22, 2004 1:24:58 PM EST

StudentC: Mar 22, 2004 1:25:06 PM EST

StudentC: Strenth: Help the players concentrate Mar 22, 2004 1:26:30 PM EST

StudentA: Weakness: explanations are kept short, and sometimes people don't understand what you meant Mar 22, 2004 1:26:38 PM EST

StudentA: We need to begin the last phase Mar 22, 2004 1:27:27 PM EST

StudentA: Ant more strengths or weaknesses? Mar 22, 2004 1:27:54 PM EST

StudentC: Strength: help users improve technical skills Mar 22, 2004 1:27:57 PM EST

StudentA: nice one Mar 22, 2004 1:28:05 PM EST

StudentA: weakness: some people may be reluctant to participate Mar 22, 2004 1:28:38 PM EST

StudentA: two minutes remain Mar 22, 2004 1:28:54 PM EST

StudentC: Why and how? Mar 22, 2004 1:28:55 PM EST

StudentA: I will stop recording in one minute Mar 22, 2004 1:29:15 PM EST

StudentA: any last thoughts? Mar 22, 2004 1:29:27 PM EST

StudentC: good nice job for the first experience Mar 22, 2004 1:29:47 PM EST

StudentB: why do you suggest solution for weakness? Mar 22, 2004 1:30:02 PM EST

StudentA: I think so too. Thanks for a good online experience Mar 22, 2004 1:30:31 PM EST

StudentA: What do you mean? Mar 22, 2004 1:31:00 PM EST

StudentC: Shoee I guess this question for StudentA right? Mar 22, 2004 1:31:12 PM EST

StudentB: Yes. Mar 22, 2004 1:31:19 PM EST

StudentA: I don't understand the? Mar 22, 2004 1:31:32 PM EST

StudentB: It says list the proposed solutions for resolving some of the problems Mar 22, 2004 1:32:05 PM EST

StudentA: Face to face classroom Mar 22, 2004 1:32:32 PM EST

StudentA: Time to go. Bye Bye Red Team Mar 22, 2004 1:33:06 PM EST

StudentB: any other? Mar 22, 2004 1:33:11 PM EST

Reflections on Activity

RED TEAM

  1. Strength and Weakness of this Activity

Strength / 1. Being able to communicate from different locations.
2.Everyone participated.
3.We had a good internet connection.
4.Help the players concentrate.
5.Help users improve technical skills
Weakness / 1.One team member is AWOL.
2. Explanations are kept short, and sometimes people
don’t understand what you meant.
3.Some people may be reluctant to participate.

2. The proposed solutions for resolving some of the problem.

Face to face classroom

3. No suggestions or comments.