RP3b

University of Warwick – Major Proposals Checklist

Project Title
Funder Name
Principal Investigator and Co-Investigators
Proposal Number / Proposed Start and End Dates:

Financial (including University Contribution and matters relating to Size)

Funder Price: / Please attach a full budget to this document
Full Economic Cost
Direct Cost Budget
What terms and conditions are associated with this source of funding? Is European funding involved? Please highlight any significant element of cost eligibility, overhead rules, invoicing/claims requirements and similar.
Does the proposal require the University to make any investment?
What existing members of staff will be (part) funded from this proposal?
Are there any offsetting savings? For example, will the proposal include a travel budget that will take the pressure off departmental resources?
Are there any major items of expenditure or other major expenditure ‘spikes’?

Legacy Costs

Is there a need for the continued employment of members of staff?
Will there be any other ongoing costs? For example, will equipment need to be replaced/refurbished/enhanced/maintained?

Space

Briefly explain the space requirements (for staff, equipment and services):
Is there any refurbishment needed for this project to proceed? (For example, does air conditioning need to be installed?) Will all/any of the costs be externally funded?

Strategic, Reputation, Ethical and Governance Considerations

What claw back provisions are included in the draft agreement?
What are the output reporting requirements? Please attach a summary of the contracted outputs.
What are the key risks?
What are the proposed governance and management arrangements?
Are there any State Aid issues?
Please outline any other key points:
Please attached the FR14a signed by the Head of Department, Principal Investigator and Department Administrator

Iterative Applications

For iterative applications, please outline the changes (per the major proposal criteria of space, university contribution, legacy costs, strategic issues and absolute size) since the previous iteration
I have reviewed and discussed the outputs and believe that they are achievable within the resource envelope of the grant.
I have reviewed all the application and
  • there are no onerous terms or commitments made therein to be drawn to senior management attention
  • the onerous terms or commitments made therein have been drawn to senior management attention in this document
(Delete as applicable)
I have checked the financial data enclosed herein and believe it to be accurate.
Academic Lead – Name: / Date
Administrative Lead – Name / Date