Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira

HealthScienceFaculty

REVISTA MÉDICA DE RISARALDA

Peer reviewqualificationguidelineforselection of themanuscriptguidelines Revista Médica de Risaralda

TITLE:
______

AUTHORS: ______

DATE OF RECEPTION: ______

EVALUATION STAGES

Theevaluation of thewrittenarticleincludesthefollowingaspects:

Theevaluation of thewrittenarticleincludesthefollowingaspects:

Vancouver standardscompliance
Methodology and epidemiology
Thematic
Exhibition and sustentation

All grades will be madeonevaluationformsthattheexternalevaluatormust complete

In thisstagetheexternalevaluatoris in charge of receivingthemanuscripts and determines iftherequireddocuments and annexes are found. In the case of incompletepresentation of themanuscript, itwill be returned to thejournal to be delivered to theauthors.
Presentation page
Summary and keywords
Titles and subtitles
Margins and numbering of theleaves. Papersize
Spacebetweenthelines and paragraphs
Type and size of letter
Number of sheetsused
Bibliography
Charts and tables

Itwill be verifiedthatthearticleshavecompliedwiththe Vancouver guidelines, whichispublished in the Rules section to theAuthorsontheJournal'swebsite.

QUALIFICATION / DEFICIENT(1) / INSUFICIENT(2) / ACCEPTABLE(3) / SUPERIOR(4)
PRESENTATION PAGE
TITLE AND SUBTITLES
ABSTRACT AND KEY WORDS
Margins and numbering of theleaves. Papersize
Spacebetweenthelines and paragraphs
Type and size of letter
Number of sheetsused
Bibliography
graphics and tables

FILL IN THE SPACE WITH A CHECK MARK

QUALIFICATION / DEFICIENT (1) / INSUFICIENT (2) / ACCEPTABLE (3) / SUPERIOR (4)
ORIGINALITY
INTRODUCTION
CLARITY IN THE FORMULATION AND APPROACH OF THE PROBLEM
APPLICABILITY
OBJECTIVE
METHODOLOGY
DESIGN
SAMPLE
SELECTION TECHNIQUE OF THE UNITS OF THE SAMPLE
ETHICS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
TABLES, GRAPHICS AND ILLUSTRATIONS
COHERENCE BETWEEN THE PROPOSED AND THE INVESTIGATION
NOTES AND OTHERS
.

FINAL CONCEPT
• Thearticleispublished as itis: (Mark ontheplatform: ACCEPT SHIPMENTS)
• Thearticleisapprovedwiththemodifications (Mark ontheplatform: REVISIONS ARE NECESSARY)
• Thearticleisnotpublished: ______

(Mark ontheplatform: REJECT SHIPPING)
Why?:______

In thecorrespondingspace of the editorial platform, pleasefill in whatconcernsthecommentsforthe AUTHORS and separatethecommentsforthe EDITORS.

______DATE OF EVALUATION: ______SIGN OF THE EVALUATOR.