Submission on Discussion Paper
Towards a Diversionary Framework for the ACT
April 2011
About ACTCOSS
ACTCOSS acknowledges that Canberra has been built on the traditional lands of the Ngunnawal people. We pay our respects to their elders and recognise the displacement and disadvantage they have suffered as a result of European settlement. We celebrate Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and ongoing contribution to the ACT community.
The ACT Council of Social Service Inc. (ACTCOSS) is the peak representative body for not-for-profit community organisations, people living with disadvantage and low-income citizens of the Territory.
ACTCOSS is a member of the nationwide COSS network, made up of each of the state and territory Councils and the national body, the Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS).
ACTCOSS’ objectives are a community in which all people have the opportunities and resources needed to participate in and benefit from social and economic life and the development of a dynamic, collaborative and viable community sector.
The membership of the Council includes the majority of community based service providers in the social welfare area, a range of community associations and networks, self-help and consumer groups and interested individuals.
ACTCOSS receives funding from the Community Services Program (CSP) which is funded by the ACT Government.
ACTCOSS advises that this document may be publicly distributed, including by placing a copy on our website.
Contact Details
Phone:02 6202 7200
Fax:02 6281 4192
Mail:PO Box849, Mawson ACT 2607
E-mail:
WWW:
Location:Weston Community Hub,
1/6 Gritten St,
Weston ACT 2611
Director:Roslyn Dundas
Deputy Director:Kiki Korpinen
Policy Officer:Megan Munro
April 2011
ISBN 978-1-921651-43-4(electronic version)
© Copyright ACT Council of Social Service Incorporated
This publication is copyright, apart from use by those agencies for which it has been produced. Non-profit associations and groups have permission to reproduce parts of this publication as long as the original meaning is retained and proper credit is given to the ACT Council of Social Service Inc (ACTCOSS). All other individuals and Agencies seeking to reproduce material from this publication should obtain the permission of the Director of ACTCOSS.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Therapeutic Options and Justice Reinvestment
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Young Peoples
Police and the Courts
Schools
Aboriginal young peoples and school
Other Issues
Young people with disabilities
The Legislative Framework
Links to other frameworks and reviews
Reference List
Introduction
ACTCOSS welcomes the opportunity to comment on Towards a Diversionary Framework For The ACT. This submission is in addition to the verbal input provided by ACTCOSS at forums hosted by Noetic as part of the consultation process.
ACTCOSS supports the development of a diversionary framework for the ACT. However, consultations have revealed there are few limited resources in the ACT for young people in regards to diversionary methods. It is critical funding be allocated to services currently addressing needs of young offenders and their families, often without any targeted resourcing.
This is not the first time youth justice and diversion programs have been subject to review. Reviews such as The Territory as Parent prepared by Cheryl Vardon touched on the need to ensure appropriate supports are in place for young people at risk. For any framework to achieve the aim of diverting young people from the youth justice system it is clear extra resourcing and support for collaboration between and with government and non-government agencies in meeting the needs of young people is required. The framework will only be effective if it is ingrained in all facets of service delivery and supported at all levels of government and within the community. Sustainable change needs to be systemic.
Youth workers and other stakeholders have voiced concern the definition of diversion is somewhat narrow and propose it could be a much wider holistic concept, not limited only to when a young person first comes in contact with the formal justice system.Diversion is a concept applied when a young person first displays signs of disengagement and at risk behaviours and/or when they first come in contact with police. It was noted police contact often occurred beforethe young person came in contact with the formal justice system. Throughout this comment, ACTCOSS would like to take a bigger picture view, rather than concentrating on specific diversionary models.
Therapeutic Options and Justice Reinvestment
In 2004 the Territory as Parent report recommended that “therapeutic services and placements for children and young people with high needs in the ACT be developed and piloted.”[1]Despite work progressing on the “development of a proposal for a therapeutic service for children and young people with complex needs”[2] in the form of a feasibility study, and the scope for ‘therapeutic protection places’ under the Children and Young People Act, such a service or place is still to be established in the ACT.
Therapeutic residential options are an important part of diversion. Having the opportunity for young people to access support, in a non-custodial setting can provide more options to courts and other services. The lack of such options in the ACT is hampering efforts to divert young people from the juvenile justice system.
A therapeutic option can be delivered in line with the justice reinvestment model as outlined in the discussion paper.[3] It will also meet the current gap that exists in the provision of secondary programs[4] in the service system for young people. The intensive support of therapeutic residential options will require extensive resources; however as with justice reinvestment the expenditure will have extensive positive outcomes.
ACTCOSS is aware many service providers working with young peoplereceive no specific funding to assist young offenders. Programs aimed at ‘young offenders’ and their families are often funded throughredistribution of existing allocated funds within organisations, ‘borrowed’ from other funding sources. In order to discuss diversionary programs for young people it is essential to allocate appropriate resources. There are currently limited programsequipped or partly equipped to work with young offenders, however without any funding the programs cannot operate to full capacity, if at all.
Recommendation
Specific fundingbe allocated for the development of diversionary programs for young people, including therapeutic residential options
Aboriginal and Torres Strait IslanderYoung Peoples
The discussion paper states
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people are over-represented in both community supervision and detention in the ACT[5]
On 31 March 2011 it was reported there were 28 young people in Bimberi. Out of the 28, 14 identified as Aboriginal.
Continued high numbers of (young) people who are incarcerated is of great concern.
Participation in the criminal justice system has severe long term consequences for the person, their families and communities. The effects of incarceration are longstanding, and include missed opportunities to develop skills, further education and difficulty in attaining appropriate employment well after the period of imprisonment. The consequences are intergenerational and can lead to prolonged social exclusion and recidivism.[6]
Diversionary programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young peoples and their familiesneed to be designed in a culturally appropriate way. This sentiment has been echoed by youth workers, who have stressed the importance to work where appropriate with the entire family, not just the young person in isolation. This approach has had some good reported outcomes and links in with good practice holistic program delivery.The consideration of family needs to be broad to recognise the range of close and supportive relationships a child or young person may have with people outside of their biological family.
It is imperative Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities are consulted in the design of programs in order to ensure programs are going to be appropriate. If robust consultation and design is undertaken programs would significantly reduce levels of young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples incarcerated and provide them with opportunities for rehabilitation.
Recommendation
Culturally appropriate and sensitive diversionary programs are designed for Aboriginal andTorres Strait Islander young peoples
Aboriginal communities are encouraged to co-design and are consulted in the design of programs
Aboriginal families and/or family structures are considered in the design of programs
Police and the Courts
Stakeholders report there is not enough work being done for young people on suitable, workable bail conditions. Often the young person has had limited contact with anyone who can assist them legally and bail conditions are articulated with limited consideration or information about the young persons ability or capacity to comply with these conditions. Stakeholders report there are times when inventive and understanding magistrates who have experience in working with young people, do put forward suitable, workable bail conditions, however a lack of consistency with this approach often contributes to a negative outcome for the young person. Stakeholders noted there are only a limited number of referral pathways, which added difficulty to the situation.
Similar reports by stakeholders were made in regards to the three Australian Federal Police Youth Liaison Officers. Youth workers report these members of the AFP are very keen and want to assist in good outcomes for young people, but there are only three positions across the ACT, which means capacity and resources are stretched. Stakeholders felt the AFP could play a bigger, active and more positive role with young people particularly in early intervention before any charges have been made, however current resources do notalways allow for this.
During consultations it was recognised that since its inception over a decade ago the Children’s Court has not been significantly reviewed. There is scope for the review of diversionary frameworks to consider the role of the Children’s Court and the potential for the Court to become a ‘problem-solving’ court such as exist in other jurisdictions.
Key elements of problem-solving court programs that distinguish them from mainstream courts include: seeking to address all the underlying issues rather than simply focusing on the legal problem; judicial case management; a multi-disciplinary court team; a collaborative approach with participants; involvement of government and community agencies in the development and running of the project; and the use of therapeutic legal processes by the court and team members.[7]
Recommendation
Resources be allocated to ensure young people have appropriate access to workable bail conditions
Resources be allocated to ensure young people are able to discuss possible bail conditions before court hearings
Broaden the scope of this review to include the Children’s Court operations
Schools
It is important to acknowledge the role of schools in supporting young people to develop positive behaviours.It is of concern that the Department of Education and Training have not been able to fully engage in this consultation process.[8] The implementation of any diversionary framework must engage schools.
Primary schools arewell positioned to identifying at risk young people. Stakeholder feedback indicated primary schools often operated more cohesively than many high schools and this would make it easier to identify at risk, disengaged young people and children. Stakeholders voiced there didn’t seem be adequate channels for referrals within high schools and often the only channel to receive assistancewith a student was through Care and Protection. Stakeholders stated schools seemed to respond very quickly around attendance issues, however, long periods of time often lapsed before follow up steps were actioned.
Attendance was noted as being a symptom of bigger issues, with stakeholders stating if young people or children are regularly absent from schoolthey often fall further and further behind in their work through the schooling years which may contribute to future limited life opportunities.
The legislative change made to the Education Act in early 2010, which allows principals to suspend students for up to 15 days (when previously any suspension over 5 days needing to be approved by the Chief Executive of the Department of Education) is of concern. Young people at risk are to be encouraged to continue to engage with schools and other support services, rather than be pushed way. The results of the Student Suspension Team pilot program initiated by the Department of Education[9] are not yet publically available, but should be considered in the development of a diversionary framework, to ensure young people can remain better connected to the educational system.
Recommendation
The Department of Education and Training be engaged in the development of the ACT’s diversionary framework
The results of the Student Suspension Team pilot program be made publically available.
Aboriginal young peoples and school
Aboriginal families are often discriminated against by schools. Stakeholders raised concern around instances where some schools decided not to let a particular student attend the school within their demography due to the unfavourable ‘reputation’ of other siblings/family.
As stated in ACTCOSS’ Submission into the High Levels of Involvement of Indigenous Juveniles and Young Adults in the Criminal Justice System
Empirically, there is a strong negative correlation between educational attainment and various measures of crime. A Canadian study from the 1990s found more than two-thirds of all incarcerated men in 1993 had not graduated from high school.[10] Other data from the 1988 National Longitudinal Study of Youth in Canada found 34% of all men aged 20-23 with 11 or 12 years of schooling reported earning some income from crime, compared with 24% with a high school degree.[11]
The data on Aboriginal education levels throughout Australia are concerning; by Year 9, half of Indigenous students have not reached the required literacy standards expected for their age and have higher rates of absenteeism from school.[12] Furthermore, Aboriginal students tend to leave school earlier than non-Indigenous students, with 69% of Indigenous students still in school at age 17 compared to 89% of non-Indigenous 17 year olds.[13]
Other Issues
Young people with disabilities
Concerns have been raised young people with disabilities, including the Autism Spectrum Disorder range, are often not being catered for appropriately in terms of diversionary programs. It has been raised this group of young people often do not fit into the target group of services and as a result are falling through the gaps. Their disability(ies) are often not identified until a much later time, after they have already come in contact with the criminal justice system.
Recommendation
Resources for programs and the inclusion of diversionary programs specifically to include young people with disabilities be allocated
The Legislative Framework
There are a range of pieces of legislation needing consideration in the development of a diversionary framework. While consultations have focused on the scope of Bail Act and Privacy Act, the Children and Young Person Act needs to be considered in how it helps, or hinders, the delivery of a diversionary framework. While legislative change in itself can not bring about cultural change, the current length and inaccessibility of the Children and Young Person Act hampers understanding and use of the legislation, especially by community practitioners. There is scope to separate the Act into a number of more specific pieces of legislation, so each section is not as lengthy. For example the section focused on children’s services and childcare could be made into its own legislation, leaving care and protection and justice issues in another.
Recommendation
Consider the accessibility of the Children and Young Person Act
Links to other frameworks and reviews
There are a range of other pieces of work currently taking place, which will impact on and connect with any diversionary framework. The recent work on the review of the youth services and family support programs is still not finalised and there have also been recent examination of the out-of-home care system. The Department also issued a discussion paper on youth homelessness earlier in 2011. The ACT Government has also been undertaking reviews of other programs across government.
The issues of family support, youth services, out-of-home care and homelessness are all key to the development of a robust diversionary framework. It should also be noted there a number of reviews currently taking place into the delivery of programs at the Bimberi Youth Justice facility.
An integrated systems approach to diversionary programs would have most chance of success. Hence the framework must link into work across the whole of government and be developed through engagement with the community sector.