September2014doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1252r1
IEEE P802.11
Wireless LANs
Date: 2014-09-02
Author(s):
Name / Affiliation / Address / Phone / email
Liwen Chu / Marvell
Abstract
This submission proposescomment resolutions for subclause8.3.2, 8.3.3:
3701, 3702, 3937, 3703, 3987, 3988.
Interpretation of a Motion to Adopt
A motion to approve this submission means that the editing instructions and any changed or added material are actioned in the TGah Draft. This introduction is not part of the adopted material.
Editing instructions formatted like this are intended to be copied into the TGah Draft (i.e. they are instructions to the 802.11 editor on how to merge the text with the baseline documents).
TGah Editor: Editing instructions preceded by “TGah Editor” are instructions to the TGah editor to modify existing material in the TGah draft. As a result of adopting the changes, the TGah editor will execute the instructions rather than copy them to the TGah Draft.
CID / Clause Num / P / L / Comment / Propose Change / Resolution3701 / 8.3.2.1 / 84 / 59 / It seems Relay should always use From DS=1 and To DS =1. / As proposed / Reject
Discussion: As mentioned in note, subclause 9.49 descirbe the frame format by using one of From DS and To DS is 0.
3702 / 8.3.2.1 / 85 / 2 / It seems Relay should always use From DS=1 and To DS =1. / As proposed / Reject
Discussion: As mentioned in note, subclause 9.49 descirbe the frame format by using one of From DS and To DS is 0.
CID / Clause Num / P / L / Comment / Propose Change / Resolution
3931 / 8.3.3.1 / 86 / 55 / The constraint on the maximum MMPDU size for a VHT STA specified in the subclause 8.3.3.1 (Format of Management frames) also applies to an S1G STA.. It is necessary to amend the subclause 8.3.3.1 (Format of Management frames). / For the first paragraph and NOTE 1 of the subclause 8.3.3.1 (Format of Management frames), replace "VHT PPDU(s)" by "VHT or S1G PPDU(s)". / Accept
Discussion: Agree with the comment.
CID / Clause Num / P / L / Comment / Propose Change / Resolution
3703 / 8.3.3.6 / 89 / 23 / Why does the AP put AID Response in Association Response frame when a STA doesn't put AID Request in its Association Request? / Clarify it. / Reject
Discussion: AID information of the STA can only be in AID Response element.
3987 / 8.3.3.6 / 88 / 41 / I am not sure where the second table at the bottom of page 88 belongs / clarify / Revise
Discussion: Generally agree with the comment.
TGah editor makes the changes in 11-14/1252r1 under CID 3987
3988 / 8.3.3.6 / 88 / 29 / what does "MAD" stand for? / add definition. / Revise.
Discussion: the meaning of MAD is added per comment resolution of CID 3704, 3057.
See coment resolution of CID 3704, 3057
8.3.3.6 Association Response frame format
TGah editor: Change the rows of Order 3, 13, and 19 in Table 8-38 (Association Response frame body)(#3130) as the following(CID 3987) :
Table 8-38 Association Response frame body
Order / Information / Notes3 / AID / This field is not present when dot11S1GOptionImplemented is true.
13 / Timeout Interval (Association Comeback time) / A Timeout Interval element (TIE) containing the Association Comeback time is present when dot11RSNAActivated is true, dot11RSNAProtectedManagementFramesActivated is true, and either the association request is rejected with a status code 30 or the association request is accepted with a status code 0 and when dot11S1GOptionImplemented is true.
19 / BSS Max Idle Period / The BSS Max Idle Period element is present if
dot11WirelessManagementImplemented is true or dot11S1GOptionImplemented is true.
Submissionpage 1Marvell