Evaluatee / Semester/Year

I. Evaluation Information
Evaluatee / Department / Semester/Year
Course Observed / Section Observed / Date of Observation / Time of Observation
Evaluator / Title
II. Evaluation and Comments
INSTRUCTION Please consider each item carefully and assign the terms below to record your observation of the instructor’s job performance at the time of observation. Provide an explanation for areas marked N-Needs Improvement or D-Does Not Meet Performance Standards in the spaces provided. Use as many pages as necessary or include attachments.
M - Meets or Exceeds the Evaluation Performance Standards
The Supervising Administrator may note some areas for continued improvement and still choose this rating as long as the evaluatee’s pattern of performance is satisfactory in the four areas of professional responsibility and in reference to the position announcement, and there are no areas of significant concern.
N - Needs Improvement to Address Specific Area(s)
This rating either denotes a pattern of performance that does not adequately meet NVC’s professional responsibility standards or exhibits weakness in some area(s).
D - Does Not Meet the Performance Standards for NVC
The evaluatee has significantly failed to meet the professional responsibility standards outlined in one or more of the areas of responsibility appended to this document or the position announcement and/or has not made satisfactory progress in the areas outlined in a previous work plan.
Description / Rating
  1. The course syllabus aligns with the Course Outline of Record and the syllabus checklist.
/  M  N  D
Comments
  1. The faculty member presented topics aligned with the syllabus and Course Outline of Record.
/  M  N  D
Comments
  1. The instructor provided adequate level of individual attention and instruction.
/  M  N  D
Comments
  1. The instructor provided any necessary safety supervision or direction.
/  M  N  D
Comments
  1. The instructor actively engaged with students throughout the course and took appropriate action when student(s) were not engaged in activity.
/  M  N  D
Comments
  1. The instructor used class time effectively.
/  M  N  D
Comments
III. Overall Evaluation and Performance Summary
  1. Provide a general summary of the instructor’s performance and instructional effectiveness.

  1. This is an opportunity for the observer to acknowledge excellence.

  1. For areas markedN-Needs Improvement or D-Does Not Meet Performance Standards, describe the necessary improvement. List and briefly describe the competencies and/or behaviors necessary for the instructor to meet the evaluation performance standards.

IV. Signatures
By signing below, all parties acknowledge receipt of this evaluation.
Evaluatee / Date
Dean / Date
Vice President, Instruction / Date

Page 1 of 3; Administrative Evaluation of Faculty Dec 2017

Part One – Instruction in Alternative Learning Environments (Lab, Clinical, Studios, etc.)