Table S1 Amphibian Road-Kill Density (Km-1 Year-1) on the Roads Surveyed in This Study

Table S1 Amphibian road-kill density (km-1 year-1) on the roads surveyed in this study and by others (see Table 1) with the most fragmentary and single-species record at the bottom. Actual figures (A) have been corrected (C) for using road-kill recordability conversion factors (see Materials and Methods). Column abbreviations as in Table 1 footnote except UN unidentified, NS Salamandridae.

Site
(R rural, S suburban) / All amphibiansa / NS / B.b. / BF / GF / B.v. / P.f. / Bo. / H.a.
A / C / A / C / A / C / A / C / A / C / A / C / A / C / A / C / A / C
Warta river deltab R / 85.2 / 248 / 0.0 / 18 / 34 / jointly R = 67, C = 212 / 1.0 / 2.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0
Oleśnica fish farm R / >794 / >6009 / >267 / >4011 / 126 / 240 / 142 / 449 / 59 / 178 / >2.6 / >5.3 / >33 / >50 / >128 / >176 / 0.0
Chełmski Pond R / 872 / 2813 / 76 / 1140 / 168 / 316 / 294 / 926 / 94 / 282 / 0.0 / 46 / 69 / 12 / 48 / 8 / 32
StobrawaForestR / 432 / 1023 / 20 / 300 / 88 / 165 / 166 / 522 / 12 / 36 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0
Bialowieża ForestcR / 54 / 160 / 0.0 / 8.4 / 16 / 46 / 144 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0
Djursland PeninsuladR / 347 / 1521 / 47 / 705 / 57 / 107 / 209 / 658 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 34 / 51 / 0.0 / 0.0
Wroclaw suburbs S / 174 / 323 / 0.0 / 137 / 257 / 19 / 61 / 2 / 5 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0
Zielona Góra woods S / 260 / 507 / 1.2 / 18 / 237 / 446 / 7.4 / 23 / 0.6 / 2 / 6.0 / 12 / 4.3 / 6.0 / 0.0 / 0.0
Osnabrück areabS / 35 / 80 / 0.9 / 12 / 32 / 60 / 2.2 / 7.0 / 0.1 / 0.35 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0
Berlin woods S / 53 / 113 / 0.9 / 13 / 38 / 72 / 8.4 / 26 / 0.6 / 1.8 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0
Nijmegen area / n/a / n/a / >81 / n/a / n/a / n/a / n/a / n/a / n/a / n/a
Wrocław Plain / n/a / n/a / 12 / 22 / n/a / n/a / n/a / n/a / n/a / n/a
Sromowce Wyżne / >4172e / >189.5 / >39.5 / >3942 / 0.0 / >1 / 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0

aIncludes unidentified amphibian road kills, whereby the sum of recorded figures for species is lower than for all amphibians.

b Our recordability correction factors are most probably much too low for this results because of monitoring schedules (see Table 1).

cSee footnote to Table 2.

dCalculated consistently with other records without considering standard errors which were used by Hels and Buchwald (2001) but not available for other records.

eA mean from two incomplete breeding seasons after the filling of a new reservoir (see Table 1).