Symbolic Logic IPredicate Translations

Symbolize the following sentences, using the indicated letters.

1. Geraldine Ferraro is married. (f = "Geraldine Ferraro"; Mx = "x is married")

Mf

2. Walter Mondale is married. (m = "Walter Mondale")

Mm

3. In fact, Geraldine Ferraro and Walter Mondale both are married.

Mf  Mm

4. But Ferraro isn't married to Mondale. (Rxy = "x is married to y")

~Rfm

5. So, obviously, Mondale isn't married to Ferraro.

~Rmf

6. Nevertheless, if Ferraro is married, so is Mondale.

Mf  Mm

7. But if Ferraro is married, it's to John Zaccaro. (c = "John Zaccaro")

Mf  Rfc

8. Anyway, Ferraro is married either to Mondale or Zaccaro.

Rfm v Rfc

9. Of Course, she isn't married to both of them.

~(Rfm  Rfc) or ~Rfm v ~Rfc

10. And surely Zaccaro isn't married to both Ferraro and Jane Fonda.(j = "Jane Fonda")

~(Rcf  Rcj) or ~Rcf v ~Rcj

Symbolize the following sentences, using quantifiers as needed.

1. All events have causes. (Ex = "x is an event"; Cx = "x has a cause")

x(Ex  Cx)

2. Every event has a cause.

x(Ex  Cx)

3. Not all events have causes.

~x(Ex  Cx) or x(Ex  ~Cx)

4. No events have causes.

x(Ex  ~Cx) or ~x(Ex  Cx)

5. All natural events have causes. (Nx = "x is natural")

x((Nx  Ex)  Cx)

6. All events that have causes are natural.

x((Ex  Cx)  Nx)

7. No unnatural events have causes.

x((~Nx  Ex)  ~Cx)

8. Some unnatural events are caused.

x((~Nx  Ex)  Cx)

9. No natural events are uncaused.

x((Nx  Ex)  ~~Cx) or ~x((Nx  Ex)  ~Cx) or x((Nx  Ex)  Cx)

10. Events are either natural or uncaused.

x(Ex  (Nx v Cx))

11. Some natural events are uncaused.

x((Nx  Ex)  ~Cx)

12. Some uncaused events are unnatural.

x((~Nx  Ex)  ~Cx)

13. Some events are either uncaused or unnatural, but not both.

x(Ex  ~(~Cx  ~Nx))

Symbolize the following sentences, letting Ax = "x is an athlete";

Ox = "x is overpaid"; Ex = "x is an entertainer"; and Mx = "x is an employee".

1.Some athletes are overpaid.

x(Ax  Ox)

2.Some athletes are not overpaid.

x(Ax  ~Ox)

3.It's not true that some athletes are overpaid.

~x(Ax  Ox)

4But it is true that some overpaid employees are not athletes.

x((Ox  Mx)  ~Ax

5.And there are employees who are neither athletes nor overpaid.

x(Mx  ~(Ax v Ox))

6.Some employees are overpaid entertainers, but some are merely overpaid.

x(Mx  (Ox  Ex) y(My  Oy)

7.Some nonathlete entertainers are neither overpaid nor employees.

x((~Ax  Ex) & (~Ox & ~Mx))

8.Some employees are not athletes, nor are they entertainers or overpaid.

x(Mx  (~Ax  (~Ex  ~Ox)))

Symbolize the following sentences, letting Sx = "x is a logic student"; Lx = "x is logical"; Px = "x is popular"; and j = "jane".

1. Logic students are logical.

x(Sx  Lx)

2. No. Logic students definitely are not logical.

x(Sx  ~Lx)

3. Well, not all logic students are logical.

~x(Sx  Lx)

4.Anyway, it's true that those logic students who are logical are not popular.

x((Lx  Sx)  ~Px)

5.So if all logic students are logical, none of them is popular.

x(Sx  Lx) y(Sy  ~Py)

6.But if not all of them are logical, then not all of them are unpopular.

~x(Sx  Lx)  ~y(Sy  ~Py)

7. If all logic students are logical, then if Jane is illogical she hasn't studied logic.

x(Sx  Lx)  (~Lj  ~Sj)

8. And if Jane is both a logic student and illogical, then it's false either that logic students universally are logical or that the unpopular universally are logical.

(Sj  ~Lj)  ~{x(Sx  Lx) v y(~Py  Ly)}