SUPERPAVE Digest 133
Topics covered in this issue include:
1) VMA Specifications in Maine
by
2) Re: VMA Specifications in Maine
by
3) VMA Specifications in Maine
by <>
- To:
- Subject: VMA Specifications in Maine
- From:
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 05:52:44 EST
I am currently working on QC/QA/Superpave specs with a task group. We are
debating the proper limits to set for VMA. There is a desire to set a high
limit as well as a low limit and to use VMA as a price adjustment property.
I contend that the SHRP Table values are somewhat higher than they should be
and we should set the LSL to 1 % below JMF aim. I also think a reasonable
range would be +/- 1.5%.
I would appreciate comments from other states/state agencies on how they are
handling this issue.
- To:
- Subject: Re: VMA Specifications in Maine
- From:
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 07:38:41 -0600
I would recommend using limits the way you did before superpave. If you had
an upper limit then use an upper limit with superpave.
These are our vma limits at OKDOT.
Nominal Max. Aggregate Size
37.5mm 25mm 19mm 12.5mm 9.5mm
VMA %Min. 11 12 13 14 15
(SSD bulk specific gravity of the aggregate)
- To: <
- Subject: VMA Specifications in Maine
- From: <
- Date: 8 Dec 1998 08:31:05 CST
In NE we specify the SHRP VMA values as the Minimum. I feel we will
end up with a spec that says if the moving average of 3 or 4 tests is
below this minimum production will stop and aggregate adjustments will be
made to get the VMA above that minimum. Single tests below some value,
yet to be determined, are investigated further. We have never seen VMA
values going too high. I tend to believe the Superpave VMA values are OK
for the higher traffic levels, but somewhat low for lower traffic levels.
NE defines only 4.0% air voids as a JMF aim. Values such as VMA,FAA,
VFA, Density are just minimums or ranges and test results must be above
or within. A 4.0% target for air voids is a must but for the other tests
I see no need to tie them to target values.
SUPERPAVE Digest 134
Topics covered in this issue include:
1) Re: VMA Specifications in Maine
by Douglas Coleman <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: VMA Specifications in Maine
- From: Douglas Coleman <
- Date: Wed, 09 Dec 1998 17:23:07 -0600
I believe other questions need to be ask before you can get the right
answer. Are limits placed on % AC and Air Voids, if so The VMA limits
should be compatable with these limits. I believe a Mim. VMA spec. should
set for the Design, the JMF and controller the field mixture with Voids, AC
and VMA. Voids are a Target of 4% =/-0.5%, AC is a target =/- 0.3%, and VMA
is the JMF limit.