STUDENT NAME:Alekseeva Natalia

STUDENT NAME:Alekseeva Natalia

IIT&L EXAM MARKSHEET

STUDENT NAME:Alekseeva Natalia

DATE:April 2012

OVERALL GRADE:

Part A: MCQ / 24 / /30
Part B:Exam Answer 1 / 30 / /35
Part B: Exam Answer 2 / 20 / /35
Total: / 74 / /100
Grading: / 1
(Fail)
Less than 39% / 2
(Near Fail)
40 – 49% / 3
(Pass)
50 – 59% / 4
(Good)
60 – 69% / 5
(Outstanding)
70%+

PART A: Multiple Choice Test

Question Number / Correct Answer / Answer Given / Mark
(out of 2)
1 / A / a / 2
2 / C / c / 2
3 / A / c / 0
4 / B / b / 2
5 / A / a / 2
6 / A / b / 2
7 / B / b / 2
8 / C / c / 2
9 / A / c / 0
10 / D / a / 0
11 / A / a / 2
12 / B / b / 2
13 / A / a / 2
14 / B / b / 2
15 / C / c / 2
Total Mark
(out of 30) / 24

PART B: Exam Answer 1:

Learning Outcome / 1
(Fail)
Less than 39% / 2
(Near Fail)
40 – 49% / 3
(Pass)
50 – 59% / 4
(Good)
60 – 69% / 5
(Outstanding)
70%+
Identification of the correct definitions / Incorrect identification of definitions with little comprehension of relevant theories / Basic identification of definitions with some comprehension of relevant theories / Acceptable identification of definitions with basic comprehension of relevant theories / Correct identification and discussion of definitions with good use of relevant theories / Excellent identification and discussion of definitions with sophisticated use of theories
Use of terminology / Little or no use of relevant terminology evidencing no grasp of appropriate concepts / Basic use of relevant terminology evidencing limited grasp of appropriate concepts / Acceptable use of relevant terminology evidencing some grasp of appropriate concepts / Good use of relevant terminology evidencing a good grasp of appropriate concepts / Excellent use of relevant terminology evidencing an excellent grasp of appropriate concepts
Clarity of argument and discussion / Weak discussion that does not contain examples or answer the question / Basicdiscussion that gives limited examples and demonstrates a superficial approach to answering the question / Acceptablediscussion that gives some examples and demonstrates a satisfactory approach to answering the question / Thorough discussion that gives good examples and demonstrates an appropriate approach to answering the question / Excellentdiscussion that gives imaginative examples and demonstrates a sophisticated approach to answering the question
Use of English / Poor use of English that is difficult to read / Limited use of English requiring improvement / Basic use of English requiring some improvement / Good use of English that requires little improvement / Outstanding use of English that requires no improvement

TOTAL MARK (OUT OF 35): 30 (Your example here is particularly good and very well thought out, although PR is about more than tactics!)

PART B: Exam Answer 2:

Learning Outcome / 1
(Fail)
Less than 39% / 2
(Near Fail)
40 – 49% / 3
(Pass)
50 – 59% / 4
(Good)
60 – 69% / 5
(Outstanding)
70%+
Identification of the correct definitions / Incorrect identification of definitions with little comprehension of relevant theories / Basic identification of definitions with some comprehension of relevant theories / Acceptable identification of definitions with basic comprehension of relevant theories / Correct identification and discussion of definitions with good use of relevant theories / Excellent identification and discussion of definitions with sophisticated use of theories
Use of terminology / Little or no use of relevant terminology evidencing no grasp of appropriate concepts / Basic use of relevant terminology evidencing limited grasp of appropriate concepts / Acceptable use of relevant terminology evidencing some grasp of appropriate concepts / Good use of relevant terminology evidencing a good grasp of appropriate concepts / Excellent use of relevant terminology evidencing an excellent grasp of appropriate concepts
Clarity of argument and discussion / Weak discussion that does not contain examples or answer the question / Basicdiscussion that gives limited examples and demonstrates a superficial approach to answering the question / Acceptable discussion that gives some examples and demonstrates a satisfactory approach to answering the question / Thoroughdiscussion that gives good examples and demonstrates an appropriate approach to answering the question / Excellentdiscussion that gives imaginative examples and demonstrates a sophisticated approach to answering the question
Use of English / Poor use of English that is difficult to read / Limited use of English requiring improvement / Basic use of English requiring some improvement / Good use of English that requires little improvement / Outstanding use of English that requires no improvement

TOTAL MARK (OUT OF 35): 20