Æsthetic Guidelines for Campus Development

University of Maryland

Guidelines Review for Campus / District Volumes

2003-4

Volume Date Reviewer .

Topic Scale: Ineffective Excellent

A. How well did this volume communicate:

Urban / Campus Design principles and terms 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Landscape Architecture principles and terms 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Architecture principles and terms 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Location, boundaries, character 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Features: description and evaluation 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

History: how we got to the current situation 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Facilities Master Plan goals and theories 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Issues particular to this district or the Campus 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Proposals and remedies 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Summary 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

B. How useful were the following:

Text: Clarity, comprehensibility 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Consistency of thought or idea 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Consistency among volumes 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Photos: Visual clarity 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Expressive of condition depicted 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Plans: Visual clarity 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Comprehensibility 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Expressive of concept 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Diagrams / Visual clarity 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Sketches: Comprehensibility 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Expressive of concept 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Appendices: Visual clarity 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Comprehensibility 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Expressive of concept 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

C. How did the guidelines contribute to your understanding of overall campus or district issues and remedies?

D. How did the guidelines assist your comprehension of the issues pertaining to your project site or design scope?

E. How effective was the presentation of additional site-specific information and guidelines in supplementing the data provided in this volume?

F. How could the guidelines be improved?

Thank you for your assessment of these guidelines!

University of Maryland, Department of Facilities Planning

c/o William P. Mallari, AIA, Co-ordinator Campus Development

1410-B Service Building

College Park, MD 20742-6050

email: wm72 @umail.umd.edu

fax: 301.405.2890

S:\Facilities Planning\planning\shared\Design Guidelines\Comments\Review form_22oct03.doc 3/23/2012