Staff Assembly Day

February 11, 2010

Breakout Session Notes

Globalization

  • Nazareth supports foreign education
  • International students and diversity
  • Interfaith Awareness
  • Curricular
  • Co-curricular
  • International students and financial support
  • Thinking Globally
  • Conversations
  • Resources
  • Pressure on international students to complete the programs
  • Advisement
  • Redesign the programs
  • Link Civic Engagement opportunity to the core
  • How can Nazareth remain viable
  • Influencing world issues
  • Awareness on what’s happening in our country
  • Civic Engagement
  • We are involved with LEEDMetropolitanUniversity in England
  • Virtual Campus
  • Perspective Students
  • Interacting with international students
  • Connecting
  • Encourage our students to take risks
  • Be adventurous

●Collaboration with international schools

● Addressing international students need while they are here

Competition

Community College

●2 + 2 programs

●Staff members devoted to 2 + 2

  • dedicated to transfers
  • Website information for transfer students

●Transfer Equivalency System

  • Online information for incoming transfer and current students – summer

●Satellite Campuses

  • Saturday classes

●Community Colleges are ahead of us in technology

  • Distance learning
  • Phone registrations
  • Look to them as a model

●Programs in high schools that transfer into community colleges

●Syracuse – S.U. P. A. for high school students

  • Need to get into high schools

●Look at adults going back to school – course offerings

●More full time faculty needed

Pluses at Nazareth:

●Class sizes

●Reputation

●Nurturing

●Academic Advising

Negatives at Nazareth:

●Course offerings

●Need for males

●Athletic Training

●Golf Management

●Money – costs

●Criminal Justice

Online Comp:

●Summer courses – for undergraduates

●Graduate level – work and travel

●SUNY learning network

●Movement of new schools to area

  • Legislation to limit?

Saturday Campuses/Accelerated Programs

●Use executives in MBA Programs

●MS – dedicated programs

●Certifications

●Make connections with companies

  • Make arrangements with companies and give tuition reduction by volume

●Academic support systems

  • Tutoring
  • Remedial help
  • ESL tutoring

Globalization

●Marketing our opportunities/accessibility for disabled population

●Commuter students

●Veteran population

●Rehab services attracting future students

Vision of 2020

●Communicate to campus administration plans for future enrollment

●More partnerships with other area colleges – less competition and more collaboration

●Increase services for academic services

●Offer same services to grad students that they are entitled to as undergrads

●Flexibility in over lapping undergraduate and graduate students taking courses on both levels

●High school students taking classes here

●Teaching part of undergraduate classes in high schools (Rochester City Schools)

●Need flexibility with course transfer from community colleges

●Adult students – 25 and older

●Career changer types

●After retirement – retrainees

●Life long learners

●Minorities

●Transfers

●Socio-economically disadvantaged

  • Support services of College

●Academically disadvantaged

●Out of state students

  • How to get here
  • Marketing
  • Retention

●Reaching students academically

●Marketing out of area

●Women graduate students and adult population

●Program offerings for male students

●Single parents

●Online course considerations

●Students with disabilities

●Satellite course offerings and/or campuses

●Continue with message that Nazareth is comprehensive, non-catholic institution, private and co-ed

●Address possible changes in external forces that effect enrollment – regulations, education, certificates, etc.

Environment and Climate Changes

Currently

  • Bio-diesel
  • Lowered steam output – best way to go
  • Costs? Problematic?
  • College willing/able to invest up front to see results “down the road”
  • Better publicized about recycling
  • Campus community needs to see that recycling happens
  • Be held accountable

Future

  • Building i.e., Math/Science building – LEED?
  • Flapless toilets conserve water
  • Window replacement
  • Design of heating placement in dorm rooms
  • Awards/prizes – competition for conserving
  • Larger compost/worm farm – Chartwells/Facilities

Currently

  • Library printers are set for double-sided

Future

  • Less printing
  • Computer labs – charge for printing
  • Printers need to be checked for jams – paper spits out after cancelling
  • ‘Card System’
  • Scan to file
  • ‘Environmental Green fee’ on tuition – specify for what
  • One central recycling area – boxes, etc.
  • Individual offices dump own blue box end of each day
  • Better location of trash/garbage bins
  • More bins/garbage bags

Currently

  • Shut down computer

Future

  • Eliminate drive to apartments?
  • Shuttle/electric?
  • Security/bio-degradable
  • Incentives for bike riding and carpooling
  • Year-end dumpster diving – bazaar
  • Used clothing
  • Staff Welfare Committee/carpool
  • Chartwells – paper recycle products usually go in garbage

Currently

  • New lights/gym
  • Facilities are checking lighting in buildings

Future

  • Res. Halls – after certain hour, lights dim
  • Faculty on-board about printing vs. online, single-sided vs. double
  • Motion lights – regulate – classrooms/offices/restrooms
  • On-line courses
  • Working from home – staff

Changes – Visible

  • Recycled paper towels
  • Electric cars
  • Heat
  • Controls
  • Energy audit
  • Open windows in winter especially dorm rooms
  • Older outdated equipment

Greenprint

  • Needs better promo/educate not aware of it
  • New recycle bins
  • Bio-friendly articles
  • Coffee refills $
  • Water bottles
  • Lighting – controls, sensors, timers, quality – incandescent vs. fluorescent

Students

  • How aware are they? Very
  • How important for them
  • Go Green Club
  • Pledge Tree
  • Alternative energy
  • Solar panels
  • Geo thermal
  • Partner w/companies, new products, new technology
  • Water conservation
  • Low use faucets
  • Leaks/drips
  • Recycling very important to students
  • Expand composting
  • Plastic vs. china tableware; Styrofoam at Roost
  • Class scheduling for energy conservation esp. w/online distance learning
  • More efficient use of computer labs vs. laptops
  • Students don’t know where the labs are
  • More “Internet Café” spaces

Technology

  • Tightening the gap between new faculty and older faculty
  • Student involvement in these ideas… it is happening – but where does it go? Can I.T. see ideas so they can move on some things? Follow up!
  • Without visible follow up, student/staff get tired of coming to share ideas. Need credibility!
  • Consider culture when implementing and moving forward. Culture will shift – but may take time.
  • Web mail?
  • Current Naz culture isn’t one of laptops
  • Student life gaming/technology
  • Making technology visible – not all behind the scenes
  • New ways of teaching w/technology
  • Second life?
  • Faculty seems to be slow to respond
  • How to get a culture of change?
  • Newer faculty comes in with different expectations – will we be ready for the shift? Positioning.
  • Re-allocate funding (no $$ for dorm phones – put it elsewhere!)
  • How do we know what’s happening? Not being college-age ourselves, it’s hard to keep up. Every six months or so, things change.
  • Students come in with different levels of knowledge/need
  • Give a ‘package’ upon entrance, ex: laptop/phone/I-touch/Kindle or I-pad instead of /for textbooks
  • Competitiveness with technology among incoming students
  • Don’t know what the technology will be: start with 3-5 years
  • How to get the $$ to proceed? Annual giving option?
  • Staff professional development to stay up-to-date
  • Distance learning/on-line/satellite classrooms – but not lose the personal feel of Naz
  • What technology are the students using? Social/curricular/etc.
  • Be ready for rapid change! Not just I.T. but all staff/faculty levels. May need to let go of old ways.
  • Need to catch up to 2010! Texting/long distance calls from campus (staff & students)
  • (Need to be aware of personal choice/involvement. Preferred contact info not widely available.
  • Staff not always capable of keeping up with technology.
  • Hand-held Naz apps will help with this. Portal

Financing a College Education

  • Challenges
  • Cost/$$ amount
  • Options – ways to pay
  • Internal
  • External
  • Appeals
  • Special circumstances
  • Employment under/un
  • Competing aid packages
  • Fed/State
  • Competing family priority
  • Culture – immediate gratif. (mortgage vs. financing ed.)

FELP vs. Direct Lending

  • Alt. loans, good for both
  • Sub/unsub, college and students
  • Need-based aid – FAFSA app. All must complete if seeking aid other than just Naz aid (for any Fed and State)
  • Discounting – need “blind”

NY Model vs. Other States:

  • For FA options
  • How we address the GAP?
  • How to quantify admissions recommendation to FA (transition)
  • Community resources
  • High school guidance admission (disc. of family) FA
  • Educational lobbying
  • NYS programs, ex. HHS scholarships, TAP ($5K max., $500 min.
  • Complexity Award, fall/spring, 50/50 yearly
  • Aid & Beyond (overwhelming commitment)
  • Parents/families – overwhelmed, but result in delaying action

What can we do?

  • Once accepted, better guidance/help engage families reduce the family’s stress/get them to act sooner
  • Are there grants that we should be pursuing as a college? Noyce/HEOP/Endowment Articulation
  • Other schools offer a 4 year rate – finance package how would structure?
  • How would 2+2 programs impact our residency requirement? Ease of participation.
  • What is ‘affordable’?
  • Ability to package under/grad degree, ex. P.T. Demonstrate value.

Financing a College Education

  • More difficulty paying bills – student accounts
  • Fewer loans available, due to changes in student lending – fewer options
  • More graduates with backgrounds associated with fewer resources by 2020
  • Economy will continue to cycle up and down
  • The governor is already discussing cutting TAP
  • Will continue
  • No TAP increase since 1994, while tuition continues to climb
  • Discount to student vs. actual revenue
  • Potential funding cuts at state level for programs like HEOP
  • No guarantees
  • Federal grant programs down
  • Parents wanting to prepay for next four years – potential “deal” with Nazareth
  • Would require innovative payment options
  • More options for transfer students needed due to increase in community colleges-financial aid payment
  • Need for transfer-friendliness – recruiting, financial aid, academics
  • Transfer students:
  • offering less than average incoming freshman, more opportunities for greater revenue
  • making connections with two-year schools, plan on Nazareth
  • “Discount” is more about competition with competing schools
  • Becomes a “money game”. How do we “win”?
  • “Wal-Mart Effect” – becomes issue of volume vs. quality
  • Housing?
  • Live off campus to keep costs down.
  • First and second year requirement for living on campus – if enrollment is down.
  • Empty beds equals a potential decrease in revenue
  • More inter-office communication; more automation, efficiency.
  • Automation + efficiency = accuracy
  • There is a need for better/reliable/innovative technology to support increased enrollment/need with same amount of staff
  • Variance in “customers”:
  • Not just traditional students
  • Due to the economy being down, there will be an increase of adult / nontraditional students
  • Diverse programs, time offering, flexibility within program requirements
  • Non-traditional like transfers:
  • Less Nazareth money, especially for Graduate students
  • Cheaper for college in terms of aid
  • Significant impact on revenue with this population – leads to increased competition with similar schools
  • Undergrad vs. Graduate financing:
  • Decrease in ESTP due to companies cutting money and benefits
  • More last minute registration leading to greater pressure on financial offices.

Globalization

  • International Recruitment
  • Financing concerns
  • Language skill issues
  • Demand in SE Asia
  • Seeing some increase in European students
  • Athletics is a draw
  • 2020 Goals
  • Language skill support
  • Increase bilingual staff
  • Inter-college collaboration (RAC)
  • Dietary needs
  • CFS – opportunities for increased diversity (e.g., Muslim student organization)
  • Muslim chaplain
  • Students expect international mission trips
  • Funding international student organizations
  • Interdepartmental collaboration and campus communication
  • Technology
  • On-line learning
  • Certification program / 2 year program / individual courses
  • Effective delivery
  • Financing / tuition differential?
  • Communication key
  • Increased investment in infrastructure
  • Staff training for on-line students plus more diverse students
  • Sending our students to international locales
  • After graduation, more international opportunities
  • Promote quality education to “marry” traditional with on-line technology
  • What are other institutions doing?
  • How competitive will we be?
  • Financing
  • What draws students to us?
  • Look closely at degree offerings
  • Lower sticker price?
  • Housing when college closed:
  • Married students?
  • Families?
  • Graduate students?
  • Veterans:
  • Counseling?
  • Support groups
  • Housing
  • Training for faculty/staff
  • Disability services
  • Job placement
  • Training needed for diversity
  • Research other colleges
  • Curricular questions – freshman seminar to increase tolerance and understanding
  • Student training for increased understanding of diversity
  • Student empowerment
  • External campus? / Sister school?

Technology

We use technology to get students – what do we use when they are here?

  • Files, forms, document management
  • Do we have structure / support?
  • Stay open to new tech / new ideas
  • Support IT / Spend the $$$
  • Stay compatible with students
  • Need R & D for technology
  • Make smarter decisions
  • Process first – don’t let tech lead
  • Technology needs to be part of all job descriptions
  • Keeping fresh
  • Support faculty so that we can have some united tech plan
  • Keep our students using our technology
  • Technology as assessment of programs/events
  • Do more than “mission critical”
  • Hybrid programs
  • Contact makes us who we are
  • Idea of 24 hour contact – response
  • Customer Service vs. Education
  • Parent involvement and information
  • Development of technology best practice
  • Set expectations of contact service and 24/7 opens
  • Student assumptions
  • Nimble
  • Text messaging – use / misuse
  • Documentation of information so that everyone can answer a question
  • Change vs. challenge
  • Prepare students for the technology they face
  • Central database of tech needs and what’s available
  • Government and Process

Competition

  • Aggressive advertising on TV increases visibility
  • Lower cost for tuition
  • Define what makes Nazareth special and define what students are looking for
  • Recruit from community colleges
  • Define target market
  • Capitalize on graduate programs at Nazareth
  • Make more flexible schedule in grad programs
  • Create:
  • Hybrid programs
  • Job transition programs
  • Two year skill development programs
  • Professional or certificate programs
  • Latino market is growing – look beyond the familiar
  • Recruit – look at high schools, guidance counselors, what they do
  • Why do people take on-line courses? Convenience.
  • Look at Nazareth’s on-line and ed technology
  • Recruit adult learners
  • Look at Nazarethfacilities. Need updating:
  • Dorms
  • Sports
  • Science labs
  • Technology
  • Music facilities
  • Etc.
  • Investment in security paid off as has investment in grounds, but interiors need upgrading
  • Instill a culture of giving early on with undergraduates
  • Examine competition and what they are doing
  • Benchmark colleges like Nazareth and see what they are doing
  • Combat Fisher’s large-scale campaign
  • To remain competitive, look at core curriculum
  • Look at direction employment is taking. Large corporations are dying in area – what is the future? (Small business, health care, etc.)
  • Look at business trends/projections for area
  • Still is a need for teachers – gradSchool of Education especially
  • Look at what we do well and build our strengths
  • When you get grad students, they pay full rate – UG is discounted. International students pay full rate too
  • Delivery of services in Grad and UG – length of time to get degree, flexibility of program.
  • Look into option of 3-year BA and strengthen graduate programs
  • Look at models of success at 2 + 2 programs
  • Are community colleges looking at offering 3-year Bas in the future?
  • What are 4-year colleges doing to partner with community colleges?
  • Do we compete with community colleges or develop relationships with them

College Accountability

  • Be intentional (not same-ole-same-ole)
  • Focused on outcomes (students*) Advertise outcomes
  • Make connection to what we are doing – to outcomes
  • Think progressively – what do we need to do NOW in order to address those needs
  • Students/Parents are customers – What do they want/need?
  • Does our curriculum match the job market? It needs to!!!
  • How does what we (dept) do fit w/LO? How to measure?
  • What will student population look like?
  • How will our roles/responsibilities change?
  • How will additional barriers/struggles affect retention and grad rates?
  • Can we clearly define student demo in order to better prepare?
  • Maintain high-academic standards *Important*
  • Services/schedules to accommodate changing demos
  • Would we be willing to decrease enrollment and offerings to fine tune our focus? Make hard cuts acad/staff.
  • How can we better support Grad Students and that changing demo? (services, housing, other)
  • What are we doing? Why? And how does it fit? *we have to assess*
  • In order to better understand “our” mission, we need to be able to share our stories and see how they fit w/LO.
  • How can we increase collaboration between div/dept/fac/staff?
  • Simplify/combine/discard
  • Accountability within institution across divisions needs to be more in line/on same page
  • Accountability of resources/use across divisions/dept (without losing quality)
  • Participate in proff/orgs including State/Federal lobby efforts

Demographics

  • Do we have 2 + 2 agreements? (Peer-MCC, FLCC)
  • Honor Scholarships
  • Are we targeting the States that are growing? (NJ, AZ)
  • Recruiters in new areas, regional reps
  • Marketing to Canadian/International students
  • Discounting Students
  • Need to market to adult learner as an undergraduate
  • Evening classes (fit in with their schedules)
  • On-line classes
  • Transfer credits
  • Looking at 2nd careers, not staying in one job for 40 years
  • Look at Majors we offer – ex: Health Care Admin.
  • Or piggy back on to a degree
  • What’s in place for people far away with regards to vacations…
  • Retention rates – how do we improve them
  • Different Athletic programs – males, hockey
  • We need facility space for practices – field house
  • Push to increase science programs to go along with the new building
  • Facility is sometimes a deal breaker
  • Summer course schedule
  • Programs build to attract students – ex: Summer School of Arts
  • Collaborate with other Colleges for weekend classes
  • Intensive 2 week summer classes
  • Getting younger students on campus so they begin to think ahead to college
  • Offer/expand Certificate Programs for older adults
  • Overnights for sports/HEOP students
  • More recruiters in key areas
  • Build programs
  • Best bang for buck
  • How expensive are on-line?
  • Need faculty who are receptive to on-line courses
  • Need to look at classes we offer and perhaps stop offering some
  • Adjunct teachers prefer night classes
  • Full Professors might not want to teach at night
  • Look at overall atmosphere on campus
  • Male – athletes: artists
  • What attracts the “average Joe”?
  • Programs need to fit
  • Perceived as strong gay population – would we promote that?
  • Image of College
  • Still perceived as: Catholic and Girls
  • Name Change
  • Modification of name
  • Who does the College want to attract
  • The “average Joes” Don’t stay once they get here
  • No connection
  • Leave because of programs
  • Clicks
  • Don’t like it- move to different school
  • Price
  • Don’t forget to attract “average Jill’s”
  • Indentify what Nazareth wants to be
  • Pro’s and Con’s to having Greek groups or other niches to feel connected
  • How big do we want to get?
  • Safe environment
  • Articulating the value of a Nazareth Degree as compared to other schools
  • Perception-associates with small privates
  • Fisher
  • Don’t have enough ump to attract from peer schools
  • Tap into Government Financials
  • Mandate

Competition