Guidance for University
Departments and Functions

Safety Services Office

Glove selection guide

Section titlePage number

Gloves as Personal Protective Equipment1

Definitions related to glove standards1

Glove materials2

Chemical resistance3

Use with biological agents4

Disposable vs re-useable gloves5

Gloves for incidental and extended contact5

Glove selection charts6

References8

Appendices:

Appendix 1: SUMMARY: GENERAL RULES FOR HAND PROTECTION*9

Appendix 2: CORRECT USE OF GLOVES10

Appendix 3: EXAMPLE OF A GLOVE SELECTION (CHEMICAL RESISTANCE)

CHART11

* Please note this appendix covers a single page and can easily be copied for inclusion in local departmental documentation.

Gloves as Personal Protective Equipment

The Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) at Work Regulations 1992 require that:

“Every employer shall ensure that suitable personal protective equipment is provided to his employees who may be exposed to a risk to their health or safety while at work except where and to the extent that such risk has been adequately controlled by other means which are equally or more effective.”

PPE is always the “last resort” in a hierarchy of control measures, i.e. engineering controls and safe systems of work should always be considered first. This is because:

  • Gloves only protect the wearer – they do not remove the contaminant from the workplace
  • If protective gloves are used incorrectly, or are badly maintained, the wearer may not be protected
  • Gloves themselves can cause skin problems
  • Wearing gloves interferes with the wearers sense of touch
  • The extent of protection depends on a good fit
  • Some types of gloves are inconvenient and interfere with the way people work

In any given situation, it is important to establish the exact purpose of a protective glove:

  • Is a glove needed at all?
  • Is a glove needed just to keep the hands clean?
  • Is it for protection against heat, cold, abrasion or cuts?
  • Is it for protection against chemicals?
  • Is it for protection against blood-borne viruses?
  • Is it for protection against laboratory animal allergens?

Definitions relating to glove standards

Permeation rate is the rate at which the chemical will move through the material. It is measured in a laboratory and is expressed in units such as milligrams per square metre per second, or some other [weight of chemical] per [unit area of material] per [unit of time]. The higher the permeation rate, the faster the chemical will move through the material. The process of permeation continues even when the glove is no longer in contact with the chemical.

Users should be aware that when a glove has been in contact with a chemical, the glove will to some extent be infiltrated with the chemical due to permeation.

Permeation is different from penetration. Penetration occurs when the chemical leaks through seams, pinholes and other imperfections in the material: permeation occurs when the chemical diffuses or travels through intact material.

Breakthrough time is the time it takes a chemical to permeate completely through the material. It is determined by applying the chemical on the glove exterior and measuring the time it takes to detect the chemical on the inside surface. The sensitivity of the analytical instruments used in these measurements influence when a chemical is first detected. The breakthrough time gives some indication of how long a glove can be used before the chemical will permeate through the material.

Degradation is a measurement of the physical deterioration of the material due to contact with a chemical. The material may get harder, stiffer, more brittle, softer, weaker or may swell. The worst example is that the material may actually dissolve in the chemical.

Glove materials

Selection of glove materials should be based on quantitative information such as permeation rate, breakthrough time, penetration and degradation. Various factors like the thickness of the material, manufacturing methods, and product quality control can have a significant effect on these properties.

For a given thickness, the type of polymer selected has the greatest influence on the level of chemical protection. For a given polymer an increase in thickness will result in a higher level of protection. A rule of thumb is that double the thickness will quadruple the breakthrough time.

The manufacturing process of glove making may result in slight variations in performance. The user is warned to exercise care and to check the glove regularly for breakthrough and diminished physical performance.

Some of the more common glove materials are:

  • butyl - a synthetic rubber with good resistance to weathering and a wide variety of chemicals.
  • latex (natural rubber) - a highly flexible and conforming material made from a liquid tapped from rubber plants. Also referred to as NRL.
  • neoprene - a synthetic rubber having chemical and wear-resistance properties superior to those of natural rubber.
  • nitrile - a copolymer available in a wide range of acrylonitrile (propane nitrile) content; chemical resistance and stiffness increase with higher acrylonitrile content. Also called NBR or HNBR.
  • polyethylene - a fairly chemical-resistant material used as a freestanding film or a fabric coating.
  • polyvinyl alcohol - a water-soluble polymer that exhibits exceptional resistance to many organic solvents that rapidly permeate most rubbers. Not to be used with aqueous solutions.
  • polyvinyl chloride - a stiff polymer that is made softer and more suitable for protective clothing applications by the addition of plasticizers. Also called vinyl or PVC.
  • polyurethane - an abrasion-resistant rubber that is either coated onto fabrics or formed into gloves or boots.
  • Viton® - a registered trademark of DuPont, it is a highly chemical-resistant but expensive synthetic elastomer.

For a few specific situations when it is impossible to predict the variety of hazards, multi-laminate gloves made of layers of several different materials are available.

Of these materials, the most commonly used gloves in laboratories are latex and nitrile:

Latex gloves

Latex disposable gloves offer no worthwhile protection against many commonly used chemicals. They will severely degrade, often in a matter of seconds or minutes, when used with some chemicals (e.g. turpentine).

An estimated 8-12% of the population are allergic to latex products, and staff required to wear latex gloves should receive training on the potential health effects. If latex is required, hypo-allergenic, non-powdered gloves should be used.

The use of disposable latex gloves is only appropriate for:

  • Most biological materials including laboratory animal allergens;
  • Non-hazardous chemicals;
  • Very dilute, aqueous solutions of hazardous chemicals: Less than 1% for most hazardous chemicals or less than 0.1% if a known or suspect human carcinogen is in use in aqueous solution;
  • Clean work area requirements;
  • Medical, veterinary and animal husbandry applications.

Nitrile gloves

Nitrile disposable gloves are more durable and provide a clearer indication when they tear or break. They also offer a better set of chemical resistances and are less allergenic. In all cases single use, surgical or examination type nitrile gloves can be substituted for latex gloves.

Chemical resistance

The selection of the proper chemical-resistant glove begins with an evaluation of the task to be undertaken. Factors that influence this selection are:

  • the type of chemicals to be handled;
  • frequency and duration of chemical contact – longer exposure time will shorten the breakthrough time;
  • nature of contact (total immersion or splash only);
  • concentration of chemicals;
  • temperature of chemicals – higher temperature will shorten the breakthrough time;
  • abrasion-resistance requirements;
  • puncture-, snag-, tear-, and cut-resistance requirements;
  • length of hand and arm to be protected (hand only, forearm etc.);
  • dexterity requirements - this need may significantly limit the thickness of glove material that can be used;
  • grip requirements (dry grip, wet grip, oily) - the requirement for textured or non-slip surfaces to improve grip must be considered;
  • cuff edge (plain, knit wrist, gauntlet);
  • colour requirements (to show contamination);
  • thermal protection;
  • size and comfort requirements;
  • price.

For mixtures and formulated products, the glove should be selected for maximum protection against the chemical component with the shortest breakthrough time (unless specific test data are available). Care should be taken to select a glove material that is compatible with all the components.

Use with biological agents

The testing methodology outlined in the 2003 EU standards is sufficient for demonstrating a barrier to bacteria and fungi, but not viruses. If gloves have been tested for resistance to bacteria and fungi (and passed) they have ‘EN374-2: 2003’ displayed on the box, with the associated biohazard symbol and further details on the grading of the pass.

To be tested for viral penetration, gloves must go through ASTM F1671-97b testing, which is an American standard test method. These tests use Phi-X174 bacteriophage penetration as a test system. The Phi-X174 bacteriophage is one of the smallest known viruses at 25-27 nm in size (for comparison: Hepatitis B is 42-47 nm and the HIV virus is 80-110 nm in size).

Manufacturer websites will give further information and detail of whether these tests have been conducted. However, a ‘pass’ in these tests should not mean the gloves are used as a line of defence against a biological agent. Gloves must be used as “last resort” protection, after other control measures have been applied where possible.

Disposable versus re-usable gloves

The first task is to decide if single use, surgical or examination type gloves will provide adequate protection. Reusable gloves are necessary wherever there is heavy contact with chemicals, immersion in chemicals or potential for contact with extremely hazardous chemicals. Disposable gloves can provide protection only against splashes and incidental chemical contact. Disposable gloves do not provide the same degree of chemical protection as reusable gloves. Disposable latex and nitrile gloves are the most common gloves used in research laboratories. Standard latex examination gloves are cheap and do provide protection for biological and minor chemical hazards. However, they are not recommended for protection from chemicals and are generally not listed in chemical glove selection guides. While disposable nitrile gloves are slightly more expensive than latex, glove selection data can be found for some of them, and they are more suitable for general lab use.

Note that the performance levels defined by BSEN 374, as described above under “definitions, may not be assigned to some disposable gloves, which are classified as being “For minimal risks only”.

Again it must be remembered that gloves are the last line of defence against chemicals and must therefore be used as “last resort” protection, after other control measures have been applied where possible.

Re-useable gloves

Glove decontamination and reuse are controversial and unresolved issues. Often, surface contamination can be removed by scrubbing with soap and water; at other times, as in the case of emulsifiable concentrates, it may be practically impossible. The solvents in many emulsifiable concentrates prompt this concern. Volatile solvents such as toluene and xylene readily penetrate many polymers and the non-volatile solvents, such as alkylated napthalenes and petroleum oil, are very difficult to remove from the glove material.

Once absorbed, some chemicals will continue to diffuse through the material toward the inside even after the surface has been decontaminated. For highly chemical resistant gloves, the amount reaching the inside may be insignificant, but for moderately performing materials, significant amounts of chemicals can reach the inside. This may not occur during use, but while the glove is stored overnight. The next morning, when the worker dons the glove, he may be putting his hand into direct contact with a hazardous chemical. In addition to the chemical resistance of the glove material, the amount of chemical reaching the inner surface can be affected by the duration of exposure, duration of storage, the surface area exposed and the temperature.

The decision to reuse the gloves requires consideration of these factors as well as the toxicity of the chemical(s). Unless extreme care is exercised to ensure decontamination, the reuse of gloves that have been contaminated with a toxic chemical is not advisable. For this reason, the disposal of gloves on a regular and frequent basis is advisable.

Gloves for incidental and extended contact

"Incidental contact" - none, or very little, actual contact with a chemical in use is anticipated.

  • Disposable gloves can be used for incidental contact, as long as no very hazardous chemicals are being used.
  • The gloves are there to prevent chemical contact with the skin when something goes wrong - a spill or splash to the hand, over spray from a dispensing device, etc.
  • As soon as practicable after the chemical makes contact with the gloved hand the gloves must be removed and replaced.

"Extended contact" - the gloved hands come into substantial contact with or actually may become covered with or immersed in the chemical in use.

  • Generally, a glove specified for incidental contact is not suitable for extended contact and a more substantial glove will be required.

Glove selection charts

Gloves of various types are available from many different manufacturers and distributors. For non-incidental contact, start with selection charts provided by glove manufacturers. However, note that:

  • Different manufacturers use different formulations and manufacturing processes, and a glove from one company may not have the same chemical resistance as a similar glove from another company.
  • Glove selection based on the manufacturers' glove selection charts is often impossible, as only a limited range of chemicals have been tested for use with a specific manufacturer's glove. In particular, many research-grade chemicals have not been tested by the various glove manufacturers. If in doubt contact the manufacturers of the chemical and the glove for advice.

Physical performance may be a more critical factor in some cases than chemical resistance. If a job application involves handling heavy, rough, or sharp objects then the glove must have high resistance to abrasion, cuts, snags, etc. A hole in a glove can provide much greater chemical exposure potential than molecular permeation. The thicker the glove material the greater the chemical resistance, but thick gloves can impair grip, dexterity, and safety. Consider sensitivity and the ability to grip as very important factors.

The proper glove design and fit contribute to comfort, productivity, and safety. Curved-finger glove design fits the natural hand contour for working comfort. Gloves that are too small bind and cause undue hand fatigue. However, gloves that are too large are uncomfortable, hard to work in and can be dangerous if they get caught up in work equipment.

The phrase sometimes found on Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) “Wear impervious (or impermeable) gloves” is technically inaccurate. No glove material remains impervious to a specific chemical indefinitely and no one glove material is resistant to all chemicals. Some chemicals will travel through or permeate the glove in a few seconds, while other chemicals may take days or weeks. Information specifying the best type of chemical protective material should be on the MSDS (e.g. neoprene, butyl rubber). If this information is missing, contact the supplier or manufacturer of the product. Contact the glove manufacturer if you have specific questions about their gloves.

A professor in the USA died in 1997 from exposure to dimethylmercury, which penetrated her latex gloves.

A researcher at Darmouth died in June of 1997 from acute mercury poisoning. Her exposure was the result of approximately one-half of a milliliter of dimethyl mercury falling on her hand during an experiment. Although she was wearing latex gloves and replaced them soon after the exposure, within several months she had developed mercury poisoning. The reason for her exposure was that dimethyl mercury easily permeates latex gloves. She and many of her colleagues around the world were totally unaware of this property of dimethyl mercury although they frequently use it.

The type of chemical used is the most important factor for selecting gloves to protect against chemical exposure, especially for highly toxic chemicals. Select the glove with the highest chemical resistance rating and other glove properties that best address your application. For highly toxic chemicals, the use of an inner and outer glove may be necessary. For example, a highly resistant laminated glove should be worn under a pair of long-cuffed, unsupported neoprene, nitrile, or similar heavy-duty gloves when highly toxic chemicals are being handled.

There are many resources available to assist in selecting the proper glove for your application (see references and appendix 3).Such tables should be used as a starting point for proper selection of glove material, but not used alone. These charts have their limitations:

  • it is often not possible to tell what thickness of glove is being referred to
  • it is often not possible to tell on what basis judgements such as “good” or “poor” are being made (breakthrough time, permeation rate?)
  • conflicting advice will sometimes be found
  • there is sometimes no indication of the quantitative data on which semi-quantitative statements are based (what is the cut-off between “good” and “fair”?)
  • unless specifically stated, charts giving breakthrough times or permeation rates do not refer to thin disposable gloves.

Reliable information is best obtained by finding data for the specific glove in question – this information is usually only obtainable from the supplier or manufacturer. This is sometimes available on manufacturers’ websites (see References). However it should be noted that the type of information and level of detail given by manufacturers varies.