Date: Tue Dec 7, 2004 9:00 pm
Author:Colon,
Attachment:tara_evaluation_electronic_portfolio.doc (37888 bytes)
Subject: Re: My portfolio
I will just list somethings that I found while evaluatingyour portfolio that I am sure you arealready fully aware of but here it is anyway:
The font and formatting was changed on some pages (Index & Outcome 4). Should be Verdana 10 and I am not sure if centering is acceptable.
Introduction is supposed to be a 250 word essay. I like the poem though. See "Course Documents: Guidelines on Writing Portfolio Introduction".
Documentsneed to be saved with the grammar and spell check function turned off so that the red lines don't show on your artifacts.
Several links are not working which I am sure you already know so I will not go into detail.
I think your reflections and descriptions are excellent. I didn't seethe link to your videos and I am pretty sure he wants us to use themfor Outcome 10.
Overall I think that you have done a very good job! It has been nice to meet youand good luck in 102!
Skill / Exceptional / Effective / Acceptable / Unsatisfactory
Content Choice / Artifacts impress the viewer by providing compelling evidence ofhow student has mastered or exceeded all outcomes covered in courses completed. / Artifacts effectively provide evidence of how student has mastered all outcomes covered in courses completed. / Artifacts adequately provide evidence of how student has met most of the outcomes covered in courses completed. / Selections seem randomor do not adequately reveal how student has met the outcomes covered in courses completed.
Reflection / Student displays impressive insight into own learning, with interesting generalizationswell supported by details. Student gives profound evaluation of personal strengths and weaknesses. / Student displays effective insight into own learning, with generalizations mostly well supported by details. Student gives accurate consideration of personal strengths and weaknesses. / Student displays adequate insight into own learning, with some generalizations supported by details. Student gives somewhat superficial consideration of personal strengths and weaknesses. / Student makes perfunctory reflections displaying lackluster interest in own work.
Integration / Student has achieved a seamless integration of outcomes, artifacts, and reflections. The viewer is impressed at how well the student’s reflections reveal the connection between the artifacts and the outcomes. / Student has achieved an effective integration of outcomes, artifacts, and reflections. The student uses the reflections effectively to reveal the connection between the artifacts and the outcomes. / Student has achieved an adequate integration of outcomes, artifacts, and reflections. There is little or no question as to how the reflections reveal the connection between the artifacts and the outcomes. / Student has not achieved an adequate integration of outcomes, artifacts, and reflections. There are significant questions as to how the reflections reveal the connection between the artifacts and the outcomes.
Use
Of
Technology / Innovative use of graphics, sound, video, and/or other media in ways that dramatically enhances the portfolio’s content. Layout is flawless, and all hyperlinks are fully functional. / Effective use of graphics, sound, video, and/or other media that enhances the portfolio’s content. Layout is near flawless, and all hyperlinks are fully functional. / Some use of interesting graphics, sound, video, and/or other media that does not, in most cases, distract from the portfolio’s content. Layout is presentable, and all hyperlinks are fully functional. / Little or no use of interesting graphics, sound, video, and/or other media appropriate to the goals of the portfolio. Use of multimedia may detract from the portfolio’s content. Layout may have flaws, and some hyperlinks may not be functional.
Expression / Student impresses viewer with command of written expression. The focus remains sharp, the organization clear. The tone is consistent and suitable. The diction is apt and precise. The writing is free from problems with word choice, sentence construction, and errors in punctuation spelling, and mechanics. / Student displays an effective command of written expression. The writing reveals few problems with focus, organization, tone, diction, word choice, sentence construction, punctuation, spelling, or mechanics. / Student displays an adequate command of written expression. The writing reveals an acceptable number of problems with focus, organization, tone, diction, word choice, sentence construction, punctuation, spelling, or mechanics. / Student displays a poor command of written expression. The writing reveals an unacceptable number of problems with focus, organization, tone, diction, word choice, sentence construction, punctuation, spelling, or mechanics.
Rubric for Electronic Portfolio Evaluation