© RNIB 2011
RNIB Centre for Accessible Information (CAI)
Literature review #4.1
Final report: Feasibility of developing a diagnostic touch test to determine braille reading potential
Published by:
RNIB Centre for Accessible Information (CAI), 58-72 John Bright Street, Birmingham, B1 1BN, UK
Commissioned by:
As publisher
Authors:
(Note: After corresponding author, authors are listed alphabetically, or in order of contribution)
Heather Cryer*, Sarah Home
*For correspondence:
Tel: 0121 665 4211
Email:
Date:21 July 2011
Document reference:CAI-LR4.1[07-2011]
Sensitivity:Internal and full public access
Copyright:RNIB 2011
Citation guidance:
Cryer, H. and Home, S. (2011). Final report: Feasibility of developing a diagnostic touch test to determine braille reading potential. RNIB Centre for Accessible Information, Birmingham: Literature review #4.1.
Acknowledgements:
Sarah Morley Wilkins, Alison Long, Mandy White, Claire Wilson
CAI-LR4 [09-2010]
© RNIB 2011
Interim report: Feasibility of developing a diagnostic touch test to determine braille reading potential
RNIB Centre for Accessible Information (CAI)
Prepared by:
Heather Cryer (Research Officer, CAI)
FINAL report
21 July 2011
Table of contents
Executive summary
Introduction
1. Barriers to learning braille for adults with acquired sight loss
2. Age, disease and tactile sensitivity
3.Tactile sensitivity and braille reading
3.1 Diabetes and braille reading
3.2 Age and braille reading
3.3 Differences in tactile sensitivity between blind and sighted people
4. Existing methods used to test touch
4.1 Common touch tests
4.2 Testing touch in blind and partially sighted people
4.3 Summary
5. Existing methods used to train touch
5.1 Feeling ready to read
5.2 Dot-to-dot
5.3 A touching experience
5.4 Summary
6. Other issues to consider
7. Conclusions
Recommendations
References
Executive summary
There are various barriers to learning braille for people with acquired sight loss. A key barrier is the belief that old age and disease such as diabetes and the perception of accompanying reduction in tactile sensitivity may prevent success in learning braille. Various research has investigated this issue, showing some relationship between touch sensitivity, however, various findings show that declining sensitivity does not prevent people from reading braille. Further research investigates differences in tactual sensitivity between blind and sighted people, showing blind people to have superior sense of touch. This may be due to practice (using their sense of touch more) and possible changes in brain functionality to process different types of information. The fact that poor touch doesn't necessarily prevent success with braille, and that touch sensitivity can be improved with practice suggests potential for a tool to test and train touch in order to encourage braille learning. A brief review of existing methods used to test touch is given, including tests specifically aimed at blind/partially sighted people for the development of 'pre-braille' skills. Further work should investigate the potential of using pre-braille training materials to give people the opportunity to try out their sense of touch before trying to learn braille. Materials from existing braille courses could be adapted and made available separately, for use in this way by individuals or rehabilitation workers.
Introduction
Many people with acquired sight loss choose not to learn braille, for various reasons. One important reason is that many older adults feel they do not have sufficient sense of touch to be able to discriminate braille dots. In order to understand whether tactile perception could be measured and even trained, this paper investigates the relationship between touch and braille reading, and considers ways of measuring and developing tactile perception.
1. Barriers to learning braille for adults with acquired sight loss
Despite the many benefits of braille, only a small percentage of blind or partially sighted people read this tactile format, around 5% of those registered blind or partially sighted in the UK (Douglas, Corcoran and Pavey, 2006). Although braille is often thought of as something for "blind" people, braille is also read by people who are partially sighted, as people in this group may also struggle to read printed material. Douglas et al (2006) found that 3% of those registered partially sighted read braille.
Research suggests that frequency of braille use declines with age, and that the later in life someone loses their sight, the less likely they are to engage in learning braille (Goudiras, Papadopoulos, Koutsoklenis, Papageorgiou and Stergiou (2009). Many people lose their sight due to age related diseases (Orr, 1992) and it is important to understand the possible barriers to learning braille for this group.
Firstly, people losing their sight may feel a stigma attached to braille. Braille is strongly associated with blindness, which may prevent those who are still coming to terms with sight loss from taking an interest (Erin and Sumranveth, 1995;Schroder, 1996) and may relate to negative stereotypes of blindness (Wells-Jensen, 2003).
Secondly, many people believe that the braille code is difficult to learn. This includes widely held beliefs by people unfamiliar with braille that the code is very complex (Wells-Jensen, 2003) with specific concerns about the complexity of contracted braille. For example, Greaney and Reason (2000) highlight the complexity of having contractions which differ in meaning depending on context, requiring good memory on the part of the reader (see also Clunies-Ross (2005) for a review of research on the subject of contracted and uncontracted braille).
It is not only potential learners who are put off by the complexity of learning braille, but also braille teachers. A number of studies have identified teacher attitudes to be an issue in braille take-up, both due to teachers' own opinions about the complexity of the braille code (Stone, 1988; Ponchillia and Durant, 1995) and due to deficiencies in training and resources (Rex, 1989).
The availability of braille teaching services may be another barrier to braille learning, an issue that has been debated for many years. Pester (1993) highlighted the need for more frequent braille instruction, and more encouragement for braille learners. Franks (1998) emphasised the importance of clear information about the benefits of braille, and well trained teachers to increase uptake and dispel negative rumours about the braille code. More recent research (Douglas, Franks, Weston and Clements, 2009) highlights the variation in availability of services across the UK and the lack of consensus among professionals about the purpose and benefits of braille.
Douglas et al (2009) also investigated the views of adults with acquired sight loss, and found that availability and promotion of braille teaching were a key concern which may put people off learning braille. Other perceived barriers to braille uptake included the development of technology (due to the feeling that technological solutions could offer more than braille) and age. Age was a barrier in various ways. Some older people simply felt they were too old to learn something new (and for some, this view had been suggested to them!). Others felt that the reduction in sensitivity of the fingertips with age meant reading braille would not be possible for them (though it must also be noted, that some readers were keen to learn braille because it was a challenge).
2. Age, disease and tactile sensitivity
The reduction in tactile sensitivity with age is a well documented phenomenon (Stevens, Foulke and Patterson, 1996; Legge, Madison, Vaughn, Cheong and Miller, 2008). This could be a key barrier to braille learning in adventitiously blind adults. Many people lose their sight due to age related conditions (Orr, 1992) with around 75% of those registered blind or partially sighted being over the age of 65 (The Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2008). Many older people are aware of the decline in functioning with age, and evidence suggests that some may choose not to learn braille simply because they believe they have insufficient tactile sensitivity (Douglas et al, 2009).
Tactile acuity may also be reduced through disease. Diabetic retinopathy is one of the five leading causes of sight loss in the UK (Future Sight Loss UK, 2009), and diabetes also causes nerve damage which can affect the sensitivity of the fingers (Harley, Pichert and Morrison, 1985). As with age-related decline, evidence suggests that some people may reject the use of braille in the belief that their diabetes holds them back (Bernbaum, Albert and McGarry, 1989).
Evidence suggests that tactile sensitivity can be reduced through both ageing and disease. But how does this affect braille reading ability? And how does this fit into the broader relationship between blindness and touch?
3.Tactile sensitivity and braille reading
3.1 Diabetes and braille reading
Various research considers the effects of diabetic neuropathy on braille reading ability. Nakada and Dellon (1989) studied the relationship between two point discrimination threshold and ability to read braille. The two point discrimination threshold measures how far apart two points need to be for someoneto perceive the two points separately rather than feeling it as one point (see section 4.1.1 for more on the two point discrimination test). They found a correlation between two-point discrimination and braille reading ability, with participants with a static two-point discrimination threshold of 5mm or above, or a moving two-point threshold of 4mm or above being unable to read braille. These findings are supported by Bernbaum et al (1989) who also found that those with two-point discrimination thresholds above 5mm had difficulties with braille. However, in this study, 22 out of 35 participants - all with diabetic neuropathy - were successful in learning standard sized braille. Based on these findings, Bernbaum et al (1989)suggest that diabetics should not be discouraged from learning braille. This view is shared by Harley et al (1985) who successfully trained a number of diabetics in braille. Indeed, Harley, Pichert and Morrison (1986) highlight the importance of motivation and practice in braille learning, as well as the potential of modified braille materials (such as jumbo braille, in which the spacing of the cell is enlarged to improve discrimination of the dots).
3.2 Age and braille reading
Stevens et al (1996) studied the relationships between age, tactile acuity and braille reading. Findings showed that tactile acuity reduced with age, for all participants (blind and sighted, aged 18-81) at a similar rate of around 1% per year (note: of the blind participants, around half were totally blind, the rest had light perception but could not read print). A relationship was also found between tactile acuity and braille reading speed, suggesting that as tactile acuity declines, braille reading speed may also reduce.
These findings appear to make logical sense: as you age, you lose your tactile acuity, and losing tactile acuity reduces the ability to read braille. However, it should then follow that all aging braille readers would eventually lose their ability to discriminate braille dots; but this is not the case. Legge et al (2008) aimed to unravel this conundrum, by studying tactile acuity of blind and sighted subjects across age groups.
The findings of Legge et al (2008) again demonstrated a general decline in tactile acuity with age. However, whilst this was true for the sighted participants, existing braille readers tested showed no such decline. These findings are at odds with previous studies (such as Stevens et al, 1996) where tactile acuity was found to decline in blind participants as well. Legge et al (2008) suggest that the reason for the difference is the method used to test tactile acuity. Whilst many studies test tactile acuity with "passive" measures (stimuli being pressed against the fingertip), Legge et al used an "active" measure in which participants could explore the stimuli by moving their fingertip. Legge et al (2008) suggest two possible reasons why this might make such a difference. Firstly, braille readers may learn effective motor strategies to pick up detailed tactile information and could go back over portions they were unsure of. Secondly, as they are free to move their finger, they could make the most of the more sensitive areas of their fingerpad even if their tactile sensitivity was in decline (see section 4 for more information about active and passive touch).
3.3 Differences in tactile sensitivity between blind and sighted people
Research has shown differences between blind and sighted people in terms of their tactile sensitivity. This was demonstrated by Stevens et al (1996) who found that whilst tactile sensitivity reduced with age in both blind and sighted participants, sensitivity was greater in blind participants at all ages. This finding is not completely clear cut, as all the participants in the study were braille readers. This means it is difficult to know whether good tactile sensitivity makes it easier for blind people to read braille, or whether blind people develop good tactile sensitivity because they use their sense of touch more.
One way in which reading braille could affect tactile sensitivity is through a process called neuroplasticity. This term refers to the ability of the brain to change as a result of experience. Scientists use various methods to study brain activity, and can pinpoint which areas of the brain are active in different tasks. Certain parts of the cortex (the outer layer of the brain) are known to be active in processing information from each of the senses, with the somatosensory cortex dealing with touch. The whole body is represented on the somatosensory cortex with different areas responding to touch from different parts of the body. Body parts with high sensory discrimination (such as lips and fingertips) have larger areas of cortex devoted to them to process the fine detailed sensations. Research has shown that intense stimulation of a particular body part can increase its cortical representation. That is to say, the amount of "brain space" devoted to dealing with the fingertips may increase when used regularly for reading braille. This may explain why braille readers' tactile sensitivity is superior to that of non-braille readers.
"Cross modal plasticity" occurs when part of the brain dedicated to a particular function is 'recruited' to perform a different function. For example, in blindness, if visual areas of the brain receive no visual stimulation they can be used instead to process tactual information. This could mean that in blind people the lack of visual input could itself contribute to greater tactile sensitivity (Goldreich and Kanics, 2003).
So what does this mean? The findings showing the extent of the decline in tactile acuity due to age in sighted individuals could suggest that those who lose their sight later in life may have reduced tactile sensitivity which could affect their ability to learn braille (Legge et al, 2008). However, findings with diabetics (Harley et al, 1985; Bernbaum et al 1989) show that poor tactile acuity does not necessarily preclude learning braille. Therefore, it may be beneficial to develop a test to determine whether someone has sufficient tactile sensitivity to read braille. Furthermore, the findings that braille readers maintain high levels of acuity, ultimately due to practice, suggests there may be scope for training to improve tactile acuity. This could be done through a package of training materials to stimulate tactile sensitivity.
4. Existing methods used to test touch
There are a variety of existing methods for testing tactile discrimination. These are commonly used to test functioning in people who have had hand surgery, or experienced nerve damage in their fingers.
There are two broad categories of touch - active and passive. Active touch refers to exploratory touch whereas passive touch refers to the sensations when a stimulus is applied to the skin (Foulke, 1991). Tests of passive touch are often used as measures of tactile perception, as such tests measure the physical limits of perception allowing thresholds to be determined. However, there is some controversy over whether measures of passive touch are relevant to braille reading ability, as braille is read with active touch (with users moving their finger to explore the braille dots).
Goldreich et al (2003) identified potential problems with both types of testing: tests of active touch could be confounded by the motor strategies people use in exploring the stimulus, whereas passive tests could be confounded by variables such as the force with which stimuli are pressed onto the skin. A review of commonly used tests of active and passive touch tests follows.
4.1 Common touch tests
4.1.1 Two point discrimination threshold (2PD)
The two point discrimination threshold is a widely used test of passive tactile acuity. Also known as the 'compass test', it involves applying two points to the skin at different separations, with the person being tested reporting whether they can feel one or two points.