Reviewer Form

/ Society for Electronics, Telecommunications, Computers,
Automation and Nuclear Engineering
11000 BELGRADE *Kneza Milosa 9/IV *Phone. 011 32 33 957 * E-mail: *

REVIEWER FORM

• In Sections I to III enter into the fields one of the values from the brackets.
• The maximum score is 100, of which up to 40 is received for scientific merits, 30 for technical quality and 30 for overall quality.
• The marks for originality (I.2) and prior publication (I.5) are entered accoding to your best knowledge. It is obvious that doe to enormous amounts of available information a single person can hardly be expected to know the majority of the published texts even in his/her narrow area of expertise.

• RETURN THIS FORM to the emailor to the section chair not later than May 10th.

I SCIENTIFIC MERITS

1. Relevance for the conference/section (0-10)
2. Originality (0-10)
3. Applicability of results (0-10)
4. Scientific contribution (0-10)
5. Did the authors already published basically the same results (if yes: –20, else: 0)

II TECHNICAL QUALITY

1. Clarity and conciseness (0-10)
2. Formatting, quality of illustrations, tables, notation(0-10)
3. Quality of references (inclusion of recent publications, relevant references of other authors)(0-5)
4. Does the title correspond to the contents (0-5)
IIIOVERALL MARK OF THE QUALITY OF THE PAPER (0-30)
IVTOTAL SCORE (Sum of the values from Sections I to III)

(The manuscripts with a total score below 30 are not acceptable for the IcETRAN conference. The same is valid for the manuscript with a score 0 in I.1, I.2 or I.4 or–20 inI.5)

V RECOMMANDATIONS TO ETRAN COMMITTEE (MANDATORY)

1. Accept without modifications
2. Accept with minor technical corrections*
3. Accept with minor scientific corrections*
4. Major modifications needed *
5. Reject unconditionally (comment on the 2nd page of the form is mandatory)

* Please use the fields at the page 2 of the form to comment

VIDo you recommand the paper for the Young Researcher Award? / Yes – No
VIIReviewer's competence(enter one of the following categories)

К=5 - expert in the field; К=4 - very good knowledge of the field; К=3 - general knowledge of the field; К=2 - poor knowledge of the field; К=1- not acquainted with the field (IMMEDIATELYreturn the paper to be forwarded to another reviewer. Suggestions for other reviewers are welcome)!

The IcETRAN committee unconditionaly accepts the opinion of the reviewers with a competence К4. IfК=3 orК=2 the IcETRAN committee may consult other reviewers.

IFК=1 RETURN THE MANUSCRIPT IMMEDIATELY TO ETRAN COMMITTEE

REVIEWER'S COMMENTS FOR AUTHORS

(Add new pages if necessary. This WHOLE reviewer's form is sent to the authors, thus no data should be entered that might compromise the anonimity of the reviewer.

1. Technical remarks

2. Minor scientific remarks

3. Major remarks whose implementation is the condition for the paper acceptance

4. General comments