Pupil Premium Strategy Statement (Secondary)

Pupil premium strategy statement (secondary)

Summary information

School / International Academy of Greenwich
Academic Year / 2017 - 2018 / Total PP budget / £62,178. / Date of most recent PP Review
Total number of pupils / 193 / Number of pupils eligible for PP / 66 / Date for next internal review of this strategy / 03.10. 2018

Current attainment

Pupils eligible for PP (your school) / Pupils not eligible for PP (national average)
% achieving 5A* - C incl. EM (2015-16 only) / N/A / 64.7%
% achieving expected progress in English / Maths (2015-16 only) / N/A/N/A / 75.8% / 73.4%
Progress 8 score average / N/A / 0.12
Attainment 8 score average / N/A / 52
% achieving expected attainment / Average / Average
% achieving expected progress / Average / Average

Barriers to future attainment (for pupils eligible for PP)

In-school barriers (issues to be addressed in school, such as poor literacy skills)
/ Poor literacy skills
/ Poor numeracy skills
/ Low self-esteem
External barriers (issues which also require action outside school, such as low attendance rates)
D. / Social, emotional and mental barriers leading to poor behaviour and/or low attendance rates

Desired outcomes (desired outcomes and how they will be measured)

/ Success criteria
/ Progress in English / Improvement in English Pearson Steps or examination percentages or reading/ comprehension ages
/ Progress in Maths / Improvement in Maths Pearson Steps or examinations percentages
/ Improved attendance / Improvement in attendance percentages
/ Improved behaviour / Reduction in number of negative points

Planned expenditure

● Academic year / 2017 - 2018 (Number of students eligible in September 2017 = 39 in Year 7 and 37 in Year 8) Allocation = £62.178
The three headings below enable schools to demonstrate how they are using the Pupil Premium to improve classroom pedagogy, provide targeted support and support whole school strategies.

Quality of teaching for all

Desired outcome / Chosen action / approach / What is the evidence and rationale for this choice? / How will you ensure it is implemented well? / Staff lead / When will you review implementation?
Improved attendance and behaviour / Smaller class sizes / High percentage of children with social, emotional and mental barriers and the need to provide a personalised, innovative curriculum to cater for their needs based on the IB’s MYP / Robust curriculum planning linked to staffing decisions and timetabling / ASO / 20/07/18
Improved attendance and behaviour / Personal Time and Extended Day options / Robust curriculum planning linked to staffing decisions and timetabling / ASO / 20/07/18
Total budgeted cost

Targeted support

Desired outcome / Chosen action / approach / What is the evidence and rationale for this choice? / How will you ensure it is implemented well? / Staff lead / When will you review implementation?
Progress in English / Interventions during English lessons and Personal Time. / Advised by the EP and STEPS Intervention Service (LA) / Targets set as advised by the EP and STEPS and these targets monitored. / ASO / 20/07/18
Progress in Maths / Interventions during English lessons and Personal Time. / Advised by the EP and STEPS Intervention Service (LA) / Targets set as advised by the EP and STEPS and these targets monitored. / ASO / 20/07/18
Total budgeted cost

Other approaches

Review of expenditure

Previous Academic Year

Quality of teaching for all

Desired outcome / Chosen action / approach / Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. / Lessons learned
(and whether you will continue with this approach) / Cost
Improved attendance and behaviour / Smaller class sizes / Success Criteria met by both PP and non-PP students / We will continue with this approach next year. / £12,583.50
Improved attendance and behaviour / Personal Time and Extended Day options / Success Criteria met by both PP and non-PP students / We will continue with this approach next year.

Targeted support

Desired outcome / Chosen action / approach / Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. / Lessons learned
(and whether you will continue with this approach) / Cost
Progress in English / Interventions during English lessons and Personal Time. / Success Criteria met by both PP and non-PP students / We will continue with this approach next year. / £12,583.50
Progress in Maths / Interventions during English lessons and Personal Time. / Success Criteria met by both PP and non-PP students / We will continue with this approach next year.

Other approaches