Polling and Voting (Chapter 8)
Lecture Outline
- Public Opinion
- Values/Attitudes that people have about issues/personalities
- Opinion leaders – Share/manipulate ideas.
- Widely held political beliefs are usually the products of campaigns by government, organized groups, or the media
- How measured?
- Impressionistic
- Person to Person
- Direct exposure (Presidents use associates)
- Quick, Efficient, inexpensive
- LIMITS awareness
- Examples
- FDR Court Stacking
- Nixon spying on McGovern
- Selective Polling
- choose informal selective individuals
- less reliable, but CHEAPER
- Bellwether District
- indicator/predictor of large segments of the population
- MAINE – Early election, followed national trend (not anymore)
- Scientific
- Surveys – REQUIRE SAMPLING
- Quota Sampling
- Most polls, respondents have characteristics that closely match general population (geography, age, sex, religion, race)
- Probability Sampling
- Most accurate, assumes every individual has chance to be polled. Correct weight given to all segments of the population
- Systematic
- Simplist, choose every Xth name
- Random
- Mathematically chosen at random, “Container whose contents are mixed”
- Area
- Breaks down into units, very accurate, very expensive
- Haphazard
- No value
- Problems with Polling
- Poor question format (Vocab, bias, etc.)
- BIAS
- PUSH POLLING
- Designed to shape the respondents opinion
- Lead to skepticism of polling by Americans
- Sample Size
- Precision is a function of sample size, not population
- Typical American poll = 450-1,500
- Tradeoff between cost and accuracy (more accurate = more expensive)
- HARRIS/GALLUP most prominent/reliable presidential polls
- Polling Errors
- Accurate but not infallible
- Underrepresenting Voters
- VENTURA (MN) Polled at 10%
- Polls rely on “likely voters”
- Ventura appealed to unlikely
- BANDWAGON EFFECT
- Polling results influence people to support a candidate
- Illusion of saliency
- Impression conveyed that something is important to the public when it is not
- OVERPOWERING OFFICIALS
- Ignorance HAS ITS USES
- Prevents leaders from being autocratic
- “negative knowledge” gives healthy fear of electorate
- INFLUENCE
- Polls do not influence individuals, but do influence leadership (which pushes policy)
- SOURCES OF OPINION DIFFERENCES
- Gender gap
- Age differences
- Less attachment to the idea of a large military to preserve peace among young
- class differences
- education/income gap
- support for government assistance programs high among those with less money and less education
- more support for civil liberties among upper/middle classes
- regional differences
- geographic gap
- south = strong military, prayer in schools
- low support for minority civil rights among white southerners
- racial differences
- OJ Simpson
- Strong support for civil rights issues
PART II: VOTING
- Expansion of Electorate
- Women, minorities, young people given more right to vote over time
- Framers originally left choice to states
- Federal government gradually exercised control
- 15th Amendment – Race
- 1965 Voting Rights Act ended literacy tests, “Jim Crow” laws
- 19th Amendment – Women (1920)
- 26th Amendment (1971) – 18 year olds
- Federal Government now exercises control by establishing national standards
- Low Turnout
- Typically 40-50%
- Much lower than Western Democracies
- Theories
- Parties less competitive
- 1800s, very high (70%), now not fighting for as many voters
- Voter Fraud lowered
- Result of Registration requirements
- Difficult registration process
- Automatic in Europe
- Requires education
- 1993 Motor Voter law – led to a spike in registration
- Same Day Registrations = Higher turnout
- Reasons for voting on specific candidates
- Party affiliation
- Declining in importance
- Interest in a particular issue
- increase in single issue voting (abortion?)
- problems – lack of clarity, agreement with different candidates on different single issues
- Prospective vision
- favorable comparison of position statements and choice of candidate
- Retrospective vision
- judge on results, not intentions
- personal appeal
- perception of competence, ability
- Types of Participation
- Inactive
- About one-fifth of pop. Does not participate in any way. Do not vote, do not even talk about politics
- Little education, low income, young
- Voting Specialists
- Vote, but no other participation
- Little schooling, but older
- Campaigners
- Vote, enjoy getting involved in campaigns
- Better educated, engage in the conflicts and struggles of politics. Strong party identification
- Communalists
- Social backgrounds similar to campaigners
- Nonpartisan
- Devote time/energy to community activities
- Parochials
- Stay away from elections, but contact politicians about specific issues
- Activists
- Constituting about 1/9th of population, these are highly educated, high incomes, and middle aged. Participate in all forms of politics.