Page 1 of 7

NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

INSTITUTE FOR PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY

AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS

Contact during exam:

Name: Harald Asheim

Tlf.: 94959

EKSAMEN IN COURSE TPG4245 PRODUKSJONSBRØNNER

Friday decmber 5. 2003

Time: 0900 - 1300

Date for censoring: January 8. 2004

Allowed materials:

C: Specified written or non written materials.Simple calculator with empty memory.


Dataheet:

The following reservoir data is given for the Eugene Island Field:

Vertical depth : 1283 m

Oil gravity : 28.6 API (0.88)

Viscosity, gas free oil, @ reservoir temp. : 2 cp

Gas gravity : 0.65

Viscosity, gaas @ reservoir conditions : 1.3 · 10-3 cp

Reservoir pressure : 134.3 bar

Reservoir temperature : 327 K

Layer heigth, productive zone : 12 m

Drainage area, close to quadratic : 80 000 m2

Horizontal permeability : 8.2 mD

Vertical permeability : 4.1 mD

Well K-5 is completed with a 2 3/8 in. production tubing. (o.d. 60.33 mm, nominal wall thickness 4.83 mm). The wellbore diameter is 160 mm. A production test resulted in the following:

Test nr. / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4
Bottom-hole pressure (bar) / 93.1 / 100.0 / 101.4 / 103.4
Oil production (Sm3/d) / 17.7 / 15.6 / 14.3 / 13.5
Gas/oil ratio (Sm3/ Sm3) / 37.9 / 42.2 / 49.7 / 42.4
Water cut % / 0.3 / 0.2 / 0.4 / 0.4
Well head temperature (K) / 306 / 304 / 304 / 303

An analysis resulted in the following (ref Ex 2000):

Gas oil ratio : 43.1 Sm3/Sm3

Viscosity, oil saturated with gas : 0.877 cP

Saturation pressure : 96.2 bar

FVF oil at saturation pressure : 1.12 m3/Sm3

Productivity index : 0.452 Sm3/d/bar

A development study concluded that to achieve the same productivity as for a vertical well, a horizontal well had to be 14.7 m long.

Specific productivity index for long horizontal well: 3.67 × 10-12 Sm3/s/m/Pa

Maximum productive well length (length of reservoir): 283 m

Pseudocritic gas pressure: 46.2 bar

Pseudocritic gas temperature: 203 K

From development studies it is decided to drill and complete a horizontal well through the whole length of the reservoir. The liner is run in hole together with a sand-screen as illustrated in figure 1.

Inner diameter, liner: 30 mm

Friction factor, liner: 0.03

The last production tubing packer will be located by the heel, TVD 1283 m, as illustrated in Fig 1. MVD along the production tubing is 1500 m.

EXERCISE 1

a) Estimate the tubing inflow pressure when producing 200 Sm3/d, neglecting pressure loss along the liner.

b) Estimate the flowing velocity aling the liner, between the toe and the heel. (suppose constant inflow density along the completed interval)

c) Estimate tubing inflow pressure when accounting for pressure loss along the liner. (Same assumptions as in Exercise 1 b)

d) Vurder (kvantitativt og kortfattet, basert på estimatene ovenfor) hvordan innstrømning og trykk langs røyret vil variere. Hvordan kan brønnkompletteringen eventuelt endres for å oppnå jevnere fordelt innstrømning. (Hva slags endringer vil du anbefale?)

d) Evaluate (quantitatively and short, based on the above estimates) how the inflow and pressure along the pipe will vary. If possible, how can you, by a recompletion achieve a more equal distribution of the inflow. (What changes would you recommend?).

EXERCISE 2

We are able to produce 200 Sm3/d until the well head pressure drops down to 10 bar, equal to the separator pressure.

a) Estimate the superficial velocity for oil and gas at the wellhead when we are producing as mentioned above.

b) Estimate flux fraction and liquid fraction (no-slip holdup and holdup), based on the Z-F operation-flux-model with the parameters: Co = 1.2, v∞ = 0.2 m/s.

c) Estimate the pressure gradient at the wellhead when we are assuming a friction factor: f = 0.015. Also estimate the bottom hole pressure by assuming a constant pressure gradient.

d) A constant pressure gradient will be an approximation because the pressure gradient will not likely be constant along the well. How will the real bottom-hole pressure deviate from the above estimate? Underlie your statement.

Figure 1 : Completion of a horizontal well on Eugene Island
Conversion factors

1 cp = 10-3 Pas

1 bar = 105 Pa

1 Darcy = 0.9869 · 10-12 m2

1 dyn/cm = 10-3 N/m

Gravity : 9.81 m/s2

Standard temperature : To = 288 k

Standard pressure : po = 1.01 bar

Gas constant : 8314.34 J/(Kmol · K)

Molecule weigth, air : 28.97

Given formulas

Productivity index, pseudo stationary oil production, radial inflow

Relationship API-gravity, specific density

Standings correlation for oil formation volume factor (SI-units)

Gas formation volume factor

Standings correlation for gas solubility (pressure in bar)

Specific, pseudo-stationary-productivity-index for a long horizontal well in a homogenous reservoir.


Pipe flow equation

Density oil, containing solution gas

General equation of state

Zuber-Findlay’s flux relation

Average, two phase flowing velocity

Volumetric flow, liquid

Volumetric flow gas

Average twophase densities

- flowing average

- volume average


Relationship between velocity and superfiscial velocity

Figure: Standing-Katz z-faktor diagram.

TPG4245 Prod.brønner

2008-8-11

HAA/alb