iii
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY – BILLILNGS
BILLINGS, MONTANA
GRADUATE STUDIES
Naturalistic Assumptions in School Counseling
and the Bahá'í Principle of the Unity of Science and Religion
A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of
Master in Education
Lyon Virostko
College of Education
April 1, 2013
iii
ABSTRACT
Virostko, Lyon. Naturalistic Assumptions in School Counseling and the Bahá’í Principle of the Unity of Science and Religion. Published Master’s of Education thesis, Montana State University-Billings, 2013.
The implications of naturalistic assumptions underlying current psychological and educational theories and methods related to the inclusion of religion and spirituality in comprehensive school counseling programs are examined and an argument is made for increased study of a holistic worldview that applies the scientific method to religious and spiritual phenomena using theistic assumptions that build on religious principles found in the Bahá'í Faith.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION 4
II. RATIONALE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 9
III. WORLDVIEWS AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY 16
IV. NATURALISM’S INFLUENCE 26
Ontological and Epistemological Implications 30
Implications for Social Relationships 36
Axiological Implications 41
Separation of Church and State in U.S. Public Schools 45
V. BAHÁ’Í VIEWS ON SCIENCE, RELIGION, SPIRITUALITY, EDUCATION 54
Science 58
Religion 64
Spirituality 79
Education 85
VI. CONCLUSIONS 97
Lyon Virostko 10
Education is a topic that garners a great deal of attention in the United States. From federal and state policy debates to family dinner tables across the country, education is a central cultural concern of the American people. Agreement among Americans about education's importance, however, does not extend to agreement about its content, methods or purpose. Disagreements about these fundamental aspects of education betray even deeper disagreements about education's basic definition and, once defined, about the degree and nature of the government's appropriate role in its operation (DelFattore, 2004; Fraser, 1999; Miller, 1990, 1995; Popkewitz, 1991; Spring, 1991, 1994). The current government efforts to draft and implement a set of common core state standards for math and English across the country emphasize the importance of economic success, framed in terms of college and career readiness (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010;U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning Evaluation and Policy Development, 2010), while others experiment with alternative educational philosophies and methodologies to contemporary public schooling, many of which, while acknowledging the relative importance of economic considerations, nevertheless stress humanistic or religious dimensions of life as the fundamental purpose of a proper education (Miller 1990, 1995). Private schools, charter schools, and home schools serve approximately 8.6 million students a year (Aud et al., 2012; Planty et al., 2009), and the range of philosophies, values, structures and methods represented by these alternative education systems suggests deep differences of opinion, understanding and conviction with regard to the goals and objectives of education in society, in particular the appropriate role of goals and objectives related to religion and spirituality (Nord, 2010; Nord & Haynes, 1998).
School counselors serve a relatively unique purpose within this overall context of diverse views about education, counseling students regarding their "educational, academic, career, personal and social needs" (American School Counselor Association, 2010, p. 1) and encouraging the "maximum development of every student" (p. 1). Freed from responsibilities for the type of assessment of student achievement required of teachers and from meting out punishment for infractions of school discipline policies required of administrators, school counselors fill the need for an adult whose primary purpose is to understand students' problems, desires, aspirations, frustrations, and pains from a genuinely unconditional perspective. Furthermore, school counselors "respect students' values, beliefs and cultural background and do not impose the school counselor's personal values on students or their families" (p. 1). Although it is certainly true to acknowledge that teachers and administrators also strive to show as much respect as possible for the diversity of values, beliefs and backgrounds brought to school by students, the fact remains that schools are an inherently acculturating place (Fraser, 1999; Miller, 1990; 1995; Palincsar, 1998; Popkewitz, 1991; Spring, 1991, 1994), and acculturation implicitly requires the sacrifice of a certain degree of a person's existing schema of values and beliefs for those espoused by the school. Within such an environment school counselors have a fairly unique opportunity to assist students in the process of synthesizing each student's preexisting schema of values and beliefs with those imposed by the school's philosophy and mission, an opportunity that is not, however, without its own ideological assumptions.
Despite the relative freedom of school counselors to adopt a more unconditional stance toward students and their developmental tasks within the school setting, it is not possible for them to remain entirely neutral toward the beliefs and values held by the students whom they serve. Although the ASCA's ethical standards explicitly state that school counselors "do not impose the school counselor's personal values on students or their families" (p. 1), it has been argued that such an objective perspective is not entirely possible (Corey, 2000) and that all counselors, of any type, bring their own worldviews to the counseling relationship in ways that unavoidably influence the nature of the insights that clients/students obtain from their involvement in counseling. The expectation that school counselors avoid imposing their values and beliefs on students is elaborated further in section E.2.a. of the ASCA code of ethics, stating that school counselors, "monitor and expand personal multicultural and social justice advocacy awareness, knowledge and skills," and that they "strive for exemplary cultural competence by ensuring personal beliefs or values are not imposed on students or other stakeholders" (p. 5). Psychologists and educators widely accept the idea that certain social relationships, such as those between counselors and their clients or teachers and their students, implicitly set up power relationships that, if left unchecked, inadvertently lead to a situation in which the client or student uncritically comes to accept the beliefs and values of the counselor or teacher. The processes involved have been studied and interpreted by psychologists and educators providing social constructivist accounts of learning theory (Palincsar, 1998), as well as by political sociologists (Popkewitz, 1991) and evolutionary biologists (Dawkins, 2006). Corey (2000), in his introductory textbook to the theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy, explores the challenge of harmonizing the reality that counselors think and operate from their own system of values and beliefs with the reality of the professional value of client autonomy. The expectation that school counselors expand their multicultural and social justice advocacy awareness, knowledge and skills, while simultaneously ensuring that their personal beliefs or values are not imposed on students or other stakeholders places school counselors in a challenging philosophical position. Personal beliefs and values are inherent properties of any epistemological system (Popkewitz, 1991; Richards & Bergin, 2005) and, as such, cannot be fully suppressed or separated from the act of cognition itself, let alone from the practices of school counseling (Corey, 2000; MacDonald, 2004). The argument that any approach to advocating for social justice can somehow occur without first resting upon and then asserting a particular set of beliefs and values is self-contradictory, for the concept of justice itself rests upon a complex system of values in which one set of attitudes, ideas, and behaviors toward others is considered wrong, while another is considered right and that efforts must be made to persuade or require others in society to abandon the wrong set of attitudes, ideas and behaviors and to adopt the right set.
Given that school counselors, therefore, cannot entirely avoid some degree of imposition of beliefs and values on students and other stakeholders as part of their work (Corey, 2000; MacDonald, 2004), it seems necessary to reassess the spirit of the ethical standard and to identify and work with the set of assumptions, beliefs, and values upon which it rests in order to understand the ultimate goal of the ethical standards related to multicultural awareness and understanding. An important goal of these ethical standards is to remain open minded and to reflectively combat the human tendency to form rigid biases and prejudices toward ideas, habits, customs, cultural practices, and beliefs that differ from our own. Expressed in active terms, one might propose that this is a different way of describing the need for school counselors to purposefully develop within themselves an authentic capacity for "unconditional positive regard" (Rogers, 1961) and to faithfully adhere to philosophical standards of scientific decision-making and inquiry (W. Hatcher, 1980; Plous, 1993; Popper, 2005). Such an expression of counselor competence does not require the counselor to become less authentic about his or her own role as a whole individual within the dynamics of the counseling relationship. In fact, the development of such a competence itself rests upon a carefully considered and deeply integrated set of beliefs and values about human nature, about the acquisition of knowledge, the purpose and meaning of human relationships, and the ultimate objectives and purposes for which comprehensive school counseling programs are developed and implemented. In other words, the school counselor's worldview, which includes ideas about both physical and spiritual (i.e., supernatural, metaphysical, etc.) phenomena, is a critical component of his or her understanding of and approach to truth and truth seeking, both for him or herself and for the students whom he or she serves (Nowlin & Blackburn, 1995).
The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence that naturalistic worldviews have on the development and implementation of school counseling programs for our nation's public schools and to examine ideas from the sacred writings of the Bahá'í Faith that contribute to the growing dialog about taking theistic worldviews seriously in both counseling and educational settings (Nord, 2010; Nord & Haynes, 1998; Richards & Bergin, 2005). My approach is theoretical and philosophical, examining implications and assumptions inherent in both common naturalistic and theistic worldviews and highlighting ways that the religious principles of the Bahá'í Faith regarding the harmony of science and religion are supported by the kind of integrationist ideas about science and religion described by Nord and Haynes (1998) and endorsed by a growing body of researchers. Although not specifically addressed to the practical, day-to-day concerns of implementing a comprehensive school counseling program, the paper does speak to the role that professional school counselors play as leaders and advocates of ethical practice in school counseling (ASCA, 2010) as well as to the need for professional school counselors to enhance their own knowledge and understanding of the ways in which different worldviews affect their own approaches to working with diverse populations (ASCA, 2010).
Rationale and Review of the Literature
Although debates about curriculum, standards, testing and instructional methods, and teacher evaluation and training tend to dominate public attention regarding education, debates about the proper role of religion and spirituality in U.S. public schools continue as well, with little sign of significant progress being made toward resolution (Berkman & Plutzer 2010; DelFattore, 2004; Fraser, 1999; Nord, 2010; Nord & Haynes, 1998). Furthermore, the issues of school and gang violence, poverty, depression, substance abuse and family dysfunction, the trauma and other consequences associated with widespread natural and economic disasters, and numerous other social stresses have created conditions in which the mental health of students in our public schools requires continued attention. The matter of students' mental health and its relationship to religion and spirituality have been the focus of a growing number of studies by psychologists (Cotton, Zebracki, Rosenthal, Tsevat, & Drotar, 2006; Davis, Kerr & Robinson Kurpius, 2003; Hall, Dixon, & Mauzey, 2004; Holder, Coleman & Wallace, 2010; Ingersoll, 1994, 2004; Pargament, Murray-Swank, & Tarakeshwar, 2005; Sink, 2004), and has gained the support of politicians such as Tim Ryan (2012), who endorses mindfulness training across many areas of society as a scientifically validated spiritual practice for dealing with many of today's stress-related problems. When it comes to resolving society's numerous challenges, the majority of Americans continue to believe that "religion can answer all or most of today's problems" (Gallup Organization, 2011) which, it could be argued, includes problems associated with education reform. Despite this continued belief among many in the ability of religion to solve today's problems, only 44% possess a "great deal/quite a lot" of confidence in the "church or organized religion" (2011), whereas an increasing number of Americans are turning toward "'unbranded' religion" (Newport, 2012) in the form of nondenominational churches and congregations, suggesting increased disillusionment with traditional forms of religion that may also represent a growing openness to consideration of alternative conceptions of spirituality and its applicability to solving social problems.
The continued beliefs and values of most Americans regarding religion and spirituality also suggest the desire by many for counseling theories and practices to honor and respect religious and spiritual worldviews (Lake, 2012; Pargament, Murray-Swank & Tarakeshwar, 2005). Likewise, many Americans wish to include greater respect for and inclusion of religious and spiritual concepts and practices in public education (Berkman & Plutzer, 2010; Fraser, 1999; DelFattore, 2004; Nord, 2010; Nord & Haynes, 1998). Efforts to lay the groundwork for inclusion of religion and spirituality in school counseling have focused primarily on views of spirituality as a separate, albeit related, construct from religion (Hanna & Green, 2004; Ingersoll & Bauer, 2004; MacDonald, 2004; Sink, 2004; Sink & Richmond, 2004), and the codes of ethics of the American Psychological Association (2003), the American Counseling Association (2005), and the American School Counselor Association (2010) all address, to varying degrees, the need for counselors to consider a client's/student's religious and/or spiritual beliefs as factors in counseling.
Despite awareness of the importance of the religious and spiritual dimensions of human life in psychology and school counseling, many efforts at integrating scientific and religious or spiritual ideas have relied on naturalistic assumptions (Richards & Bergin, 2005; Slife & Reber, 2009). Naturalistic assumptions frame consideration of religious and spiritual factors in counseling as issues of cultural pluralism (Hanna & Green, 2004; Holcomb-McCoy, Harris, Hines, & Johnston, 2008; Lonborg, 2004), cognitive adaptations acquired through evolutionary forces (Pyysiäinen, 2003, Pyysiäinen & Hauser, 2010) or neurological brain states (d'Aquili & Newberg, 1999; Newberg & d'Aquili, 2002), avoiding either philosophical or scientific engagement with the larger questions of the ontological status of spiritual/metaphysical phenomena. Such a perspective, while valuable as a bridge from the natural and social sciences toward religion and spirituality, must reach farther to complete that bridge. Questions regarding the ontological status of spiritual phenomena have significant implications for the epistemological approaches that researchers and school counselors take toward addressing the religious and spiritual concerns of students (Richards & Bergin, 2005; Mahner & Bunge, 1996; Nowlin & Blackburn, 1995). Ignoring such questions, Nord and Hayes (1998) argue, creates a climate in public education that is inherently hostile to theistic views about reality. "We must acknowledge," they contend, "that public schools do teach students to think about virtually all aspects of life in secular rather than religious ways, as if God were irrelevant and those secular ways of making sense of the world were sufficient" (p. 6). Efforts to remain neutral or indifferent on the question of the existence or non-existence of spiritual phenomena, such as God, souls, and metaphysical ideals of virtues such as beauty, justice, and love, can compel school counselors themselves to adopt a form of methodological atheism when addressing the religious and spiritual concerns of students. It is important, therefore, to examine the philosophical assumptions underlying the methods and theories related to inclusion of religion and spirituality in school counseling, for it is upon the assumptions that we hold regarding the fundamental nature of existence that questions of a religious and spiritual nature ultimately rest (Nowlin & Blackburn, 1995).