Legislation & Regulation – Fall 2010

Professor Stephenson

Section 3 (Pound 107, Wed-Fri, 8:20-9:40)

Course Description: This course is an introduction to lawmaking in the modern administrative state. It will examine the way Congress and administrative agencies adopt binding rules of law (statutes and regulations, respectively) and the way that implementing institutions – courts and administrative agencies – interpret and apply these laws. The course will consider the justifications for modern regulation, the structure of the modern administrative state, the incentives that influence the behavior of the various actors, and the legal rules that help to structure the relationships among Congress, the agencies, and the courts.

SYLLABUS

Part I: Legislation

A.  The Legislative Process and Theories of Interpretation

Wed., Sept. 1st – Introduction to Statutory Interpretation

pp. 2-3 (introductory note), 19-28, and 201-215 (United States v. Marshall, through end of note 5)

Thurs., Sept. 2nd – Text and Purpose

pp. 28-49 (Riggs v. Palmer, Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States)

Fri., Sept. 3rd – Text and Purpose, cont’d

pp. 85-98 (United States v. Kirby, Public Citizen v. Department of Justice, through end of note 2) and 49-67 (West Virginia University Hospitals v. Casey)

Wed. Sept. 8th – Ordinary Meaning, Special Meaning, and Context

pp. 111-115 (Nix v. Hedden), 193-197 (Corning Glass Works v. Brennan), 200-201 (notes 2 & 3 on Corning), and 126-140 (Smith v. United States)

[NO CLASS THURSDAY, SEPT. 9th – ROSH HASHANAH]

Fri., Sept 10th – The Legislative Process and Legislative History

pp. 140-142 (introductory note) and 152-176 (notes 1-4 after North Haven Bd or Educ. v. Bell, Blanchard v. Bergeron, Continental Can Co. v. Chicago Truck Drivers, through end of note 3).

Wed., Sept. 15th – The Legislative Process and Legislative History, cont’d

pp. 176-193 (remaining notes on Blanchard and Continental Can, Exxon Mobil v. Allapattah), re-skim 193-197 (Corning Glass), 197-200 (note 1 on Corning)

B.  Canons of Construction

Thurs., Sept. 16th – Semantic Canons

pp. 219-224 (McBoyle v. United States) and 233-249 (Gustafson v. Alloyd)

Fri., Sept. 17th – Semantic Canons, cont’d

pp. 224-233 (Silvers v. Sony Pictures) and 249-266 (People v. Smith, Circuit City Stores v. Adams)

Wed., Sept. 22nd – Substantive Canons: Avoiding Constitutional Questions

pp. 266-288 (NLRB v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago)

Thurs., Sept. 23rd – Substantive Canons: State Sovereignty

pp. 288-306 (Gregory v. Ashcroft)

Fri., Sept. 24th – Substantive Canons: Preemption of State Law

pp. 306-327 (Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator, Cippollone v. Liggett Group)

Wed., Sept. 29th – Scope and Application of Substantive Canons

pp. 337-356 (Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Lines)

Part II: Regulation

A.  The Constitutional Position of Administrative Agencies

Thurs., Sept. 30th – The Administrative State and the Delegation Problem

pp. 358-360 (introductory note), 376-394 (notes 4 & 5 after the Constitution excerpt, J.W. Hampton, Jr. Co. v. United States, introductory note before Schechter Poultry) and 407-418 (note 3 after Schechter Poultry, Whitman v. American Trucking Ass’ns, Inc.)

Fri., Oct. 1st – The Administrative State and the Delegation Problem, cont’d

pp. 418-442 (Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute)

Wed., Oct. 6th – Congressional Control of Agencies: The Legislative Veto

pp. 442-460 (INS v. Chadha) and 473-476 (section on other forms of congressional control)

[NO CLASSES OCT. 7-8]

Wed., Oct 13th – Appointment and Removal of Agency Officials

pp. 476-478 (introductory note) and 486-521 (note 2 after Buckley v. Valeo, Myers v. United States, Humphrey’s Executor v. United States)

Thurs., Oct. 14th – Appointment and Removal of Agency Officials, cont’d

pp. 522-547 (Morrison v. Olson) and supplementary handout (note on Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB)

Fri., Oct. 15th – Presidential Oversight of the Administration

pp. 548-578 (section on presidential control of agencies)

B.  The Administrative Rulemaking Process

Wed., Oct. 20th – The Administrative Procedure Act and the Forms of Agency Action

pp. 580-603 (United States v. Florida East Coast Railway)

[NO CLASSES OCT. 21-22 – CIV PRO MEETS IN OUR SLOT]

Mon., Oct 25th, 3:20-4:40, Austin West – Notice & Comment Rulemaking

pp. 604 (introductory note), 626-641 (Chocolate Manufacturers Ass’n v. Block)

Tues., Oct. 26th, 3:20-4:40, Austin West – Notice & Comment Rulemaking, cont’d

pp. 605-626 (United States v. Nova Scotia Food Products Corp.)

Wed., Oct. 27th – Alternatives to Notice & Comment Rulemaking: Adjudication

pp. 641-674 (SEC v. Chenery Corp., Bell Aerospace v. NLRB, NLRB v. Bell Aerospace)

Thurs., Oct. 28th – Alternatives to Notice & Comment Rulemaking: Guidance Documents

pp. 674-697 (PG&E v. FPC, Chamber of Commerce v. Dep’t of Labor)

Fri., Oct 29th – Alternatives to Notice & Comment Rulemaking: Interpretive Rules

pp. 697-717 (AMC v. MSHA, Hoctor v. Dep’t of Agriculture)

C.  Judicial Review of Agency Action

Wed., Nov. 3rd – Introduction to Judicial Review of Agency Decisions

pp. 717-739 (Ethyl Corp. v. EPA)

Thurs., Nov. 4th – Judicial (Non-)Regulation of Agency Procedures

pp. 739-756 (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC)

Fri., Nov. 5th – “Hard Look” Review

pp. 756-790 (Motor Vehicles Manufacturers Ass’n v. State Farm)

Part III: Legal Interpretation in the Administrative State

Wed., Nov. 10th – Judicial Review of Agency Statutory Interpretation: Early Cases

pp. 792-814 (NLRB v. Hearst, Packard v. NLRB, Skidmore v. Swift & Co.)

Thurs., Nov. 11th – Judicial Review of Agency Statutory Interpretation: The Modern Framework

pp. 814-835 (Chevron v. NLRB)

Fri., Nov. 12th – Deference and Textual Interpretation: Finding Ambiguity

pp. 835-853 (MCI v. AT&T)

Wed., Nov. 17th – Deference, Semantic Canons and Terms of Art

pp. 853-867 (Babbitt v. Sweet Home) and 885-888 (note on Chevron and legislative history)

Thurs., Nov. 18th – Deference and Structural/Purposive Interpretation

pp. 867-885 (FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.)

Fri., Nov. 19th – Deference and Substantive Canons: Constitutional Avoidance

pp. 888-900 (DeBartolo v. Fla. Gulf Coast Building & Trades, Rust v. Sullivan)

[NO CLASS NOV. 24-26 – THANKSGIVING BREAK]

Wed., Dec. 1st – Deference and Substantive Canons: State Autonomy

pp. 900-916 (SWANCC v. Army Corps of Engineers, Smiley v. Citibank)

Thurs., Dec. 2nd – Limits on Chevron’s Domain

pp. 916-940 (United States v. Mead Corp.)

Fri., Dec. 3rd – Flex class/review

1