Kevin Michael Mulvey
2464 Australia Way E., #52
Clearwater, FL. 33763-3823
(727) 239-8694
December 7, 2007
Atttention.: Attorney General Martha Coakley
Office of the Attorney General
One Ashburton Place
Boston, MA 02108
Re: Massachusetts Vs. McCowen – Barnstable County Superior Court Oct. 16th - Nov. 16th 2006
Dear Ms. Coakley,
The purpose of this letter is to share with you the details of issues that have bothered me for several years. I am the uncle of Shawn R. Mulvey a key witness for the prosecution in the above referenced case.
I watched the McCowen trial with great interest, as my nephew was an alibi witness for Jeremy Frazier who was identified by Mr. McCowen as possibly being Ms. Worthington’s murderer. On May 13, 2005 my nephew Shawn denied (via phone interview) to law enforcement that he even knew Jeremy Frazier. However, following a visit by the Massachusetts State Police (MSP) to Florida on July 1, 2005, Shawn recanted his knowledge of Frazier and provided him with an alibi for the night of the Worthington murder (January 4th-5th 2002). Through court testimony I learned that the District Attorney had proffered to the Grand Jury on June 14, 2005 that Frazier had a credible alibi witness in Shawn Mulvey for the night of the murder. The proffer of an alibi witness by the District Attorney was a full two weeks before the MSP further “interviewed” Mulvey.
With some ambivalence I must pass along some additional details. In late 2002 while I was staying at my home in Clearwater, Florida, my nephew stopped to visit me and stated, “I did the worst, worst, worst thing you could ever do to anyone or anything – I did it.” Knowing of my nephews’ unsavory lifestyle and history of violent and aggressive behavior, I did not inquire about what he was referring to, as I did not want to know the details of his possible criminal acts. I only learned of the Worthington murder after my brother had informed of an arrest in this case on April 14th 2005 that was close to his home and stated Chris McCowen was a friend of Shawn’s and had been over to his home on several occasions. I then saw it on the national TV news and read the back reports online.
Five days before the start of the Worthington trial my nephew again visited with me and in the course of conversation stated “you know what happened up there that night don’t you.” Again, not wanting any involvement with this matter, I simply stated, “yes”. He then asked me how he would make out in court and I stated, “you’ll be fine”. I then asked him if the Black Truck/SUV up Christa Worthington’s driveway on Sat. afternoon was his father’s and he stated know it wasn’t. Again the vehicle, type, color and original license plate fit the early description of Gerard Smith’s, a defense witness. (1998 Large Black 2-Door Jeep Special Edition - Mass. 12 ML)
Through court testimony I learned that there were large black boot prints found at the crime scene that were never matched to the maker. These are consistent with my nephews’ footwear and size. I also learned through court testimony of vehicular damage to the roadway surface that was also found at the crime scene. My nephew sustained damage to the duel mufflers and body kit and undercarriage of his white low rider Honda vehicle contemporaneous with the Worthington murder. The vehicle was subsequently removed to Florida on a trailer repaired and sold. I find it very curious that neither Shawn’s DNA nor fingerprints were ever collected by the MSP, despite the largest DNA dragnet in the USA.
Sadly, both my sister and I have come to the belief that our nephew has intimate knowledge of the Worthington murder and his alibi for Mr. Frazier was contrived to provide a convenient out for both and suit the flimsy law enforcement evidence and prosecution theory of events.
Since the day after the MSP interviewed Shawn on July 1, 2005 both my sister and I have experienced episodic surveillance of our homes and rather continuous telephone eavesdropping that includes “tweaking and tickling” of the wire. We are unsure what the source of this harassment is but have speculated that it originates in Massachusetts and is connected to this case. After watching the televised trial and listening to the testimony of some of the law enforcement, I have little confidence in their integrity or investigative due diligence and would not be surprised to learn that they are involved in this harassment. I am concerned that all of this involves very high-level corruption and feel that both my sister and I have been targeted because we may know too much. I do have much more to say about all of this and can prove and demonstrate the terrorism that we have and are subjected to at the proper time and with trustworthy authorities. We don’t have any confidence in even the top officials of the MSP.
I wish to remain anonymous unless absolutely needed to testify to the circumstantial details we have knowledge of.
Respectfully Yours,
Kevin Michael Mulvey
PS Please keep my new additional cell number private. Thank you in advance.
CC:
Att.: Esq., Robert A. George
Robert A. George & Associates, P.C.
77 Newbury Street
Boston, MA 02116
Mr. Barry C. Scheck
The Innocence Project
100 Fifth Avenue, 3rd Floor
New York, NY 10011