Kashmir Conflict:RamJethmalani,Minister of Law & Justice
Model United Nations
Bryan N. Cramer
West Bend East High School
(Abstract)
In examining the kashmir conflict, several primary points of interest arise. First, the cultural origins of british occupied india and the formidable social groups that have been established due to its presence. Secondly, the vast networks of rival political factions within the south asian region, and their effect on the stability and social progress of the region. Thirdly, the international axis of power that can be observed through the two primary opposing forces of Pakistan and India. These global influences on the south asian region ascertain a highly complex conflict with both regional and global influence. The prominence of the kashmir conflict in asian affairs and on the international stage lead both ideology and policy of major western states as well as pre-eminent powers within the region to grow in rigidity. The consensus of this research indicates a power dynamic unique in the world and reveals the systematic and problematic policy of the region’s boundaries.
(Main Body)
The primary figures of policy in India are derived from the Prime Minister’s cabinet. In particular, one who is predominantly concerned with the Indian nations legal affairs and enforcement, is of particular importance. Ram Jethmalani is the minister for law and justice in India. His domain of authority presided over the national legal affairs and interactions within India. Jethmalani, as a highly distinguished lawyer within India carries prestige and trust among fellow national leaders. Jethmalani's political ambitions are simple in that he seeks to change Indian policy towards Pakistan in that he favors peaceful negotiations between them. Jethmalani as minister for law and justice could order specified codes to be introduced to bring about such change as both the Department for Legal Affairs and the Legislative Department all operate to extend codified rules to law. Jethmalani has the capacity to introduce various legal reforms to protect indian civilians during the crisis but does not have the authority to use physical action.
The Kargil conflict has innately unique circumstances, as the two rival nations are inextricably linked through common heritage and ethnic tradition. The past occupation by the British Empire led India to develop many western systems of law and practice. The common features of the Pakistani and Indian governments can be observed by such commonalities as both states established legal bodies of their respective executives hold almost exactly similar responsibilities and foundations. The kargil conflict because of this remains greatly complex in its scope and relationship on the international front. China, India, and Pakistan all claim portions of the Kashmir territory, but the settlements between the countries contain competing interests of regional dominance and economic superiority. Indian interests within the Kashmir territory retain its traditional boundaries and include full reinstatement of the line of control. Full establishment of such an agreement would calm tensions between India and Pakistan. Should Pakistan claim territory beyond the traditionally held region, war of a conventional or nuclear capacity could be instituted. As war is seemingly the likely outcome as Pakistani troops extend beyond the line of control and have blocked indian resources to military and civilian populations of India. Lastly, political posturing by the chinese will only further inflame tensions of the region as an extension of chinese territory would be viewed as an act of dominance by India, the United States as a strong economic partner would look down upon such an action. Therefore it is appropriate to postulate the finer and more stable outcomes ultimately need to maintain traditional boundaries, as well as reinstate peace between the civilian populations. Conclusively, these steps are essential to the survival of the indian nation as well as the promotion and expansion of indian foreign policy and advancement.
(References)
-“India, Pakistan Must Protect Civilians.” Human Rights Watch, 20 Jan. 2010,
-“Kashmir: Conflict and Peace.” Peace Insight,
-Makhijani, Arjun. “Short History of Kashmir Dispute.” Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, ieer.org/resource/south-asia/short-history-of-kashmir-dispute/.