PAMELA K. ZANDER
CERTIFICATED ADAAA ADVOCATE
JOHN J. COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE/CUNY
P.O. Box 1544
Havasu Landing, CA 92363
760.617.7989
July 11, 2017
John Chiang, Treasurer
State of California
915 Capitol Mall
Sacramento, CA 95814
COMPLAINT
RE: Treasurer’s Letter to HSBC/Patrick J. Burke, Dated: May 14, 2015
GROSS VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS
Gross Violations of Law and Court Order: Giving Safe Harbor to HSBC – SEC VIOLATIONS, CONTROLLING SECONDARY MARKET, BYPASSING COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (failure to review Assignment of Deed of Trust from Countrywide, as recorded in public record, from original lender) to “Sudo-foreclosing” Trustee acting on behalf of HSBC (IRS FORM 8594- Asset Purchase Statement), Failure to review REMIC PAYMENT-IRS FORM 1066, as filed w/SEC (IRS Form required to enable HSBC Investors to collect legal payment); Failure to review HSBC Trustee Agreement with Countrywide Bank (HSBC is not in the chain of title) (failure to review Bank Certificate of Deposit, as in Tender for Tender.) Violation of the Safe Harbor Act; SEE: HSBC ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST herein attached as Exhibit A
Corrupt Agency: Riverside Superior Court
Address:
Judge: Daniel A. Otellia - Irma Pool Ashberry
Case Name: Faith Brashear v. HSBC
To Whom It May Concern/John Chiang;
This matter is of grave concern regarding the above named Judge and/or Judge Ottolia, engaged in “Safe Harbor,” actions that protect Plaintiff HSBC after a COURT ORDERED CEASE AND DESIST.
Plaintiff’ HSBC’S Attorney filed a lawsuit for Unlawful Detainer in the Riverside Superior Court, after the COURT’S ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST. This unlawful action to [jump in] with a “terminated and or suspended” Trust Certificate is a gross violation of the SEC and the IRS. Please request the Remic- IRS Form 1066 from this case to determine whether HSBC truly received the REMIC payments.
It is highly suspicious that HSBC has a retainer agreement with this attorney’s law firm, after receiving the Court Ordered Cease and Desist. Instead, this suit is brought on behalf of HSBC, deficient a real person, yet aimed to steal and evict individuals from their homes, specifically Faith Brashear and her family. This case is based on the above named judge’s protection of HSBC’s unlawful and treasonous act that also strips the State of CA from needed revenue, perpetrated against citizen’s involved in cases of Unlawful Detainer and/or other issues that concern foreclosures.
Violations: Judges Failure to lawfully adjudicate cases based on the California and US Constitution, statutes and laws that govern issues of “TITLE.” This judge clearly does [not] have jurisdiction, while ignoring the “Judges Bench Guide for Unlawful Detainer,” thus has engaged in a treasonous act against homeowners.
1. “SLAPPED” DEFENDANTS’ WITNESS
2. IGNORED DUE PROCESS GUARANTEES
3. DISMISSED THE TRIAL JURORS, WITHOUT ADJUDICATION OF CASE, IN FAVOR OF HSBC- HAVING NO FINANCIAL OBLIGATION TO THIS PROPERTY.
This COMPLAINT herein, calls for a Letter “Rogatoire,” from which, the Department of Justice may invoke the "inherent" authority to enact the power of the Supreme Court and/or the federal courts to issue letters rogatory, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1781: and/or lead an investigative commission by a foreign tribunal, purposed to investigate the Riverside Superior Court Judge,” and other related judges engaged in treasonous acts, perpetrated against homeowners, from which judges adjudicating pre and post foreclosure cases have harmed and or caused homeowners death, when stripped of their homes.
“These Judges have [impugned] the integrity of [this] court," posturing the crime of obstruction of justice, replete with aiding and abetting HSBC statements of perjury, when adjudicating issues of pre and post-foreclosure. Judicial misconduct is patently outrageous when committing intentional violations of the CA and U.S. Constitution, statutes and laws has made them a treasonous partner with domestic enemies.” Pamela Zander See: Exhibit A, herein attached as a true and correct copy.
Judges and/or U.S. Prosecuting Attorneys in any court system cannot
Lawfully attack ourLIENS AGAINST TREASON,which any Citizen files against Federal Judges, US Prosecuting Attorneys, Federal Agents, State and Local Public officials because of these Public officials violation of their required Constitutional Oath for the Constitution of the United States of America, without shutting down the Selective Service of the Military.
“Public Ministerpursuant to and protected by Public Law 94-583, Oct. 21, 1976 Stat. 2891 [Codified in Title 28 U.S.C. § 1602 et esq.]; and Public Law 1790, 1 Stat. At L. 117, Ch 9 [Codified in 22 U.S.C. § 252]; Public Law 1948, Ch 645, 62 Stat. 688 [Codified in Title 18 U.S.C § 112] and Public Law 1871, Ch 22, § 6, 17 Stat. 15; [Codified in 42 U.S.C. § 1986] ALSO SEE: http://uscode.house.gov/statutes/pl/94/583.pdf
28 use 1605. "§ 1605. General exceptions to the jurisdictional immunity of a foreign state "(a ) A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case— " (1) in which the foreign state has waived its immunity either explicitly or by implication, notwithstanding any withdrawal of PUBLIC LAW 94-583—OCT. 21, 1976 90 STAT. 2893 the waiver which the foreign state may purport to effect except in accordance with the terms of the waiver;
In effect, many California courts have “banded” together, whereas, “the fix is in;” reliant on any document that bears the name of a bank and/or Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (“MERS”). This driving force in foreclosure has become an impetus mechanism to protect sudden appearing REITS or securitization conduits, based on self-assigned transfers of title that forces a consumer out of their home.
This Judge ignored self assigned and false Instrumentation, while actively applying a protracted SLAPP, as homeowners battle suits over Quiet Title, Unlawful Foreclosure and Unlawful Detainers; against well funded foreclosing trustees and servicers, acting on behalf of predatory lenders or banks after the court ordered a cease and desist. Thus, foreclosure victims [amass] the courts effort to subjugate these false documents that have been recorded in the County Recorder’s Office.
> DEFICIENT, REMIC PAYMENTS, a void judgment CREATES A TYPE OF ANIT- TRUST PRACTICE, known or unknown, that combines large BANKING businesses for monopolistic purposes –
to the extent it manipulates complete control over the secondary market, from which this action has contributed to the economic LOWERING MECHANISM, PROCURED BY FAKE AUCTIONS and FALSE HUD-1 STATEMENTS.
Collusion by these courts to give a safe harbor to banks and or mortgage companies (“servicers”) engaged in unlawful mortgage fraud, violates the DOJ, FinCEN, SEC AND THE FTB, that are hinged on spurious relationships that echo a suit in RECO. All too often, these judges seem to yield to a conspiracy theory, whether by induction or deduction, but are not revealed until massive numbers of people experience the negative consequences of unlawful foreclosure causes a failed social policy. The outcome reveals 99% truth.
“Suspicious activity patterns cited by filers also differed between
CMO and REIT-related filings. In the majority of depository institution SARs related to REITs, filers cited suspected money laundering or structuring activity. CMO filings often had more complex activity patterns, which filers categorized as “other” and described in narratives.” Published under the auspices of the BSA Advisory Group. October 2010/SAR REPORTS
https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/sar_tti_18.pdf
WHEREAS, THE COURTS DECISION IS A TACIT AGREEMENT, HSBC, COMPLICIT WITH MORTGAGE FRAUD, ENGAGED TO DEFRAUD DOJ, THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IT’S EMPLOYEE’S; AFTER HSBC, IGNORED COURT ORDERS TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM UNLAWFUL MORTGAGE PRACTICES. THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION, EXERCISED BY POWER OVER LEGAL POSITION, DENYING FAITH BRASHEAR, HER RIGHT TO DEFEND HER TITLE AND PROPERTY, WHICH IS A GRAVE AND ERRONEOUS ERROR.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the Laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. I am a witness, in review of documents, retrieved from public records and attest to the above information during the presence of this judges actions in court, as this judge swayed the jurors, unconscionable in her action to dismiss the case, stating there were no triable issues.
Date: July 10, 2017 UCC-1.308 Pamela K. Zander
I, Pamela Zander am not an attorney, however I attained my education in the following areas of study: Certification as ADAAA Advocate- John J. College of Criminal Justice/CUNY, Azusa Pacific University (BSOL 2010-2011); The American School of Mortgage Banking-Certified as Loan Processor; Certified in Escrow I and II (Victor Valley College); Loan Signing Specialist (Crafton Hills College); Past Notary; Urban Study Course (Case Law)- University Southern California, Riverside; attended Securitization Workshop)
1