Integrated Communications Plan

Integrated Communications Plan

For

Steps to Success Program

Submitted by

Revised: April 5, 2011

Table of Contents

Page Numbers

Introduction 3

Phase One: Formative Research 4-9

Phase Two: Strategy 10-13

Phase Three: Tactics 14-23

Phase Four: Evaluative Research 24-26

Introduction

This integrated communications plan has been developed to address the potential crisis facing Mt. Hood Community College’s (MHCC) Steps to Success (STS) program. With a budget decision deadline of early April, the plan is incredibly compacted and fast-moving.

Phase One: Formative Research

Situation Analysis

Mt. Hood Community College (MHCC) is the prime contractor of the grant-funded Job Opportunities and Basic Skills (JOBS) program, a regional workforce training program. As part of JOBS, MHCC offers its Steps to Success (STS) program in District 2/Multnomah County, which is a welfare-to-work program that helps people overcome barriers so they can get back into the workforce. STS staff helps clients become more competitive in the job market through career services, training, skill building, support and resources. Staff also works with business partners from the community who make it possible for STS clients to gain valuable work experience.

JOBS and STS are overseen by Oregon’s Department of Human Services (DHS). MHCC is the prime contractor and subcontracts with Portland Community College (PCC) to administer some of the benefits of this program in a co-prime contractor structure. MHCC has been partnering with DHS to provide these services for 23 years. MHCC and its STS program also administer the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and Oregon Food Stamp Employment Transition (OFSET)/Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) contracts. TANF provides job search assistance and coordination of services with community partners for families where children are at risk to go into foster care.

Per the governor’s balanced budget, the funding for the JOBS program for 2011 through 2013 will be cut 60 percent. DHS plans to change its service delivery model to use in-house agencies of various community organizations rather than a co-prime or prime contractor. However, if there is sufficient funding to keep a prime contractor, this funding is slated to go to PCC rather than MHCC. MHCC could still be a subcontractor, though it wouldbe in a reduced capacity and may be through a bid process. MHCC’s current contract would end June 20, 2011.

PCC would also become the prime contractor for SNAP beginning July 1, 2011. PCC would subcontract some services on the East side, which could include services provided by MHCC.

These changes would result in layoffs of 50 or more MHCC employees and decreased opportunities for MHCC students and community members.

The decision to make PCC, rather than MHCC, a prime contractor was made not only for budgetary reasons but is also thought to be personal and political in nature. This provides MHCC with an opportunity to make its case for MHCC, rather than PCC, to be named as the prime contractor for the STS and JOBS programs. The final budget decision will be made in early April.


Organization Analysis

MHCC’s STS program routinely exceeds its targets and goals, compared to PCC, which consistently falls short.

D2 Official Placements / PCC / MHCC / Total /
Monthly Individual Target / 72 / 109 / 181 /
Percentage of Individual Target Contribution to Total / 40% / 60% / 100% /
July 2010 – Number of clients placed in jobs / 59 / 127 / 186
Percentage of Individual Target Achieved / 81% / 117% / 103%
Percentage of Combined Total Target Achieved / 32% / 68% / 103%
August 2010 - Number of Clients Placed in Jobs / 64 / 124 / 188
Percentage of Individual Target Achieved / 88% / 114% / 104%
Percentage of Combined Total Target Achieved / 38% / 66% / 104%
September 2010 – Number of Clients Placed in Jobs / 69 / 135 / 204
Percentage of Individual Target Achieved / 95% / 124% / 113%
Percentage of Combined Total Target Achieved / 47% / 66% / 113%
October 2010 – Number of Clients Placed in Jobs / 49 / 120 / 169
Percentage of Individual Target Achieved / 68% / 110% / 93%
Percentage of Combined Total Target Achieved / 22% / 71% / 93%
November 2010 – Number of Clients Placed in Jobs / 65 / 140 / 205
Percentage of Individual Target Achieved / 90% / 129% / 113%
Percentage of Combined Total Target Achieved / 45% / 68% / 113%
December 2010 – Number of Clients Placed in Jobs / 68 / 171 / 239
Percentage of Individual Target Achieved / 94% / 157% / 132%
Percentage of Combined Total Target Achieved / 60% / 72% / 132%
January 2011 – Number of Clients Placed in Jobs / 55 / 116 / 171
Percentage of Individual Target Achieved / 76% / 107% / 94%
Percentage of Combined Total Target Achieved / 31% / 64% / 95%
February 2011 – Number of Clients Placed in Jobs / 64 / 118 / 182
Percentage of Individual Target Achieved / 88% / 109% / 101%
Percentage of Combined Total Target Achieved / 35% / 65% / 100%
Total Number of Clients Placed YTD / 493 / 1,051 / 1,544
Average per month: / 62 / 131 / 193

Specifically, for the eight months ending February 2011, MHCC placed an average of 131 clients per month, versus a target of 109. Comparably, for the same time period PCC placed an average of 62 clients per month, versus a target of 72.


Each college’s results are better highlighted by a graphical representation:

Official Placements Year-to-Date for 2011

Historically, MHCC’s STS program has earned accolades and awards, including:

·  Considered the premier welfare-to-work program in the country by a 1998 study by MDRC. MDRC was founded in 1974 as the Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation. Its name was changed in 2003 to MDRC. The organization is dedicated to evaluating policies and programs for low-income people.

·  Awarded the Gresham Chamber’s Golden Note Award for contributing project assistance to businesses and organizations at no cost in January 2009

·  Received the Collaborative Solutions Northwest LLC’s “A Million Thank You’s” award in 2010

Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) Analysis

Internal
Strengths / Weaknesses
·  MHCC has a core group of dedicated, highly experienced employees.
·  MHCC has worked with DHS and the
STS program for 23 years.
·  MHCC has consistently not only met but exceeded its STS job placement goals. / ·  An MHCC personnel matter may be a contributing factor to the choice of PCC as prime contractor.
External
Opportunities / Threats
·  MHCC’s STS program has strong community support, as evidenced by numerous heart-wrenching student letters and letters of support from local businesses. / ·  PCC may have a political “in” with DHS that is guiding this decision.
·  Budgetary decisions may cut the contractor option from this program altogether, and neither PCC nor MHCC will win a contract.

The Key Publics

Following are the publics, or key stakeholders, affected by the STS decision:

Public / How Affected /
DHS partner stakeholders (including Kristen McFarlane of DHS East Self-Sufficiency and Amra Biberic of DHS SE Self-Sufficiency) and benefits branches (including Amra Biberic, Angela Greer of Maywood Self-Sufficiency and Robin Benedict and Kathy Brooks of Gresham Self-Sufficiency) / These partner stakeholders interact with and work with STS staff and clients.
MHCC employees / MHCC employees interact with and know STS employees and current STS clients.
MHCC STS employees / Cutting the program will result in layoffs for STS employees.
MHCC District Board of Education / Members are invested in all aspects of the school.
Current MHCC students / Current MHCC students interact with and know current STS clients.
Potential MHCC STS clients / Potential MHCC STS clients will not be able to receive STS benefits at MHCC and may enroll elsewhere as a result.
Current MHCC STS clients / Current MHCC STS clients will no longer be able to receive STS benefits at MHCC and may enroll elsewhere as a result.
Past MHCC STS clients / Past MHCC STS clients feel dismay that MHCC may no longer be providing the benefits that enabled them to find a job.
Community members / Low-income families within the community will no longer be able to benefit from STS services at MHCC.
Local businesses / Local businesses will no longer benefit from the high-caliber potential employees resulting from the STS program.
Elected officials / Elected officials may experience dissatisfaction among their voting population.

Benefit Statement

MHCC’s STS program has consistently exceeded its goals for the past 23 years. It has benefitted the community by helping at-risk community members find jobs and providing local businesses with qualified employees.

Phase Two: Strategy

Goals and Objectives

The goals of this plan are:

·  Convince key decision makers to keep full funding for the JOBS program

·  Convince DHS officials that MHCC, and not PCC, should be named the prime contractor, if, after the proposed budgeting changes, remaining funds allow for a prime contractor

Position:

MHCC has been providing quality and successful STS services for 23 years and is the best contractor choice to continue to provide the services for the next biennium.

The objectives of this plan are:

Public / Objective /
DHS partner stakeholders (including Kristen McFarlane of DHS East Self-Sufficiency and Amra Biberic of DHS SE Self-Sufficiency) and benefits branches (including Amra Biberic, Angela Greer of Maywood Self-Sufficiency and Robin Benedict and Kathy Brooks of Gresham Self-Sufficiency) / ·  To have an effect on awareness, specifically to ensure that 100 percent of partner stakeholders are aware of the fight MHCC is undergoing to keep the STS contract
·  To have an effect on behavior, specifically to increase unsolicited letters to elected officials by 10 percent by April 15, 2011
MHCC employees / To have an effect on awareness, specifically to make at least 90 percent of employees aware of the threat to the STS program by April 1, 2011
MHCC STS employees / To have an effect on awareness, specifically to ensure that 100 percent of STS employees are aware of the fight MHCC is undergoing to keep the STS contract
MHCC District Board of Education / To have an effect on awareness, specifically to make 100 percent of the MHCC District Board of Education members aware of the threat to the STS program by April 1, 2011
Current MHCC students / ·  To have an effect on awareness, specifically to make at least 50 percent of students aware of the STS program and its benefits
·  To have an effect on comprehension, specifically to make this same group understand the threat to the program
Potential MHCC STS clients / ·  To have an effect on comprehension, specifically to make this same group understand the threat to the program
·  To have an effect on behavior, specifically to increase unsolicited letters to elected officials by 10 percent by April 15, 2011
Current MHCC STS clients / ·  To have an effect on awareness, specifically to make 100 percent aware of the threat to the STS program by April 15, 2011
·  To have an effect on behavior, specifically for 50 percent of this group to write unsolicited letters to elected officials by April 15, 2011
Past MHCC STS clients / ·  To have an effect on awareness, specifically to make 50 percent aware of the threat to the STS program by April 15, 2011
·  To have an effect on behavior, specifically for 50 percent of this group to write unsolicited letters to elected officials by April 15, 2011
Community members / ·  To have an effect on awareness, specifically to make 20 percent aware of the threat to the STS program by April 15, 2011
·  To have an effect on behavior, specifically for 10 percent of this group to write unsolicited letters to elected officials by April 15, 2011
Local businesses / ·  To have an effect on awareness, specifically to make 20 percent aware of the threat to the STS program by April 15, 2011
·  To have an effect on behavior, specifically for 10 percent of this group to write unsolicited letters to elected officials by April 15, 2011
Elected officials / To have an effect on behavior, specifically for them to keep current funding levels, minimize budget cuts and/or keep MHCC as the prime contractor

Action and Response Strategies

The proactive strategies that may be employed to achieve the goals include:

·  Communicate directly and transparently with the news media

·  Communicate directly and transparently with the publics

·  Develop key messages to be communicated consistently

·  Encourage interaction and participation between MHCC STS publics and key decision makers

·  Use traditional, social, free and paid media

The reactive strategies that may be employed to achieve the goals include:

·  Modify the communication tactics as needed

·  Modify the key messages as needed

Key Messages

·  DHS has informed MHCC that it plans to cut funding for the JOBS program by 60 percent. This action would eliminate MHCC’s STS program.

·  In addition, DHS plans to change its service delivery model for JOBS to use in-house agencies of various community organizations rather than a prime contractor. However, if there is sufficient funding to keep a prime contractor, that contractor is slated to be PCC rather than MHCC.

·  MHCC has consistently met, and often times exceeded, its monthly goals for STS, while PCC has consistently fallen short of its goals.

·  MHCC feels that the funding for JOBS, and subsequently STS, should be restored. If that is not possible, there should be minimal budget cuts rather than the 60-percent funding cut that is currently proposed.

Message Strategies

Message Sources

Details about the spokespeople for this campaign are as follows:

·  Any spokespeople for this campaign must be thoroughly educated in the topic, and must also have credibility, charisma and control.

·  The proposed spokespeople are:

o  Dr. John. J. “Ski” Sygielski, MHCC president

o  Carol Foster, MHCC STS manager

o  Margaret L Huffman, MHCC director of communications