Project Audit
Project Title

Instructions for Peer Reviewers

Please use the attached tool to critically review and rate each relevant area of the Audit report. Feedback on how to improve the audit should be constructive and given in the comments section at the end of each relevant area. Similarly, where an area of the audit has been undertaken well please comment on this so it too can be given as positive feedback to the submitting pharmacist. Please remember that all educational feedback should be specific, informative, sensitive and directed towards improving the audit.

Please rate the level of evidence contained in the audit report for each of the criteria listed overleaf (using the rating scale where 1=Very Poor and 7=Outstanding).

Audit Project Reviewer
Please place an ‘x’ in the appropriate box
Reason for the Choice of Audit
1.
Very
Poor / 2.
Poor
/ 3.
Fair
/ 4.
Good
/ 5.
Very
Good / 6.
Excellent
/ 7.
Outstanding
1. The potential for change is described.
Comments:
1.
Very
Poor / 2.
Poor
/ 3.
Fair|
/ 4.
Good
/ 5.
Very
Good / 6.
Excellent
/ 7.
Outstanding
2. The project is relevant to practice.
Comments:
Criterion or Criteria Chosen
1.
Very
Poor / 2.
Poor
/ 3.
Fair
/ 4.
Good
/ 5.
Very
Good / 6.
Excellent
/ 7.
Outstanding
3. Are relevant to the audit subject and justifiable eg. current literature.
Comments:
Standards Set
1.
Very
Poor / 2.
Poor
/ 3.
Fair
/ 4.
Good
/ 5.
Very
Good / 6.
Excellent
/ 7.
Outstanding
4. A standard(s) is/are set with a suitable timescale.
Comments:

Please place an ‘x’ in the appropriate box

Preparation and Planning
1.
Very
Poor / 2.
Poor
/ 3.
Fair
/ 4.
Good
/ 5.
Very
Good / 6.
Excellent
/ 7.
Outstanding
5. There is evidence of teamwork and adequate discussion where appropriate.
Comments:
DATA COLLECTION
1.
Very
Poor / 2.
Poor
/ 3.
Fair
/ 4.
Good
/ 5.
Very
Good / 6.
Excellent
/ 7.
Outstanding
6. Results are compared against standards set.
Comments:
CHANGES TO BE EVALUATED
1.
Very
Poor / 2.
Poor
/ 3.
Fair
/ 4.
Good
/ 5.
Very
Good / 6.
Excellent
/ 7.
Outstanding
7.An actual example of change(s) described.
Comments:
PROJECT CONCLUSIONS
1.
Very
Poor / 2.
Poor
/ 3.
Fair
/ 4.
Good
/ 5.
Very
Good / 6.
Excellent
/ 7.
Outstanding
8. There is comparison with the first data collection and standard(s).
Comments:

Please place an ‘x’ in the appropriate box

Global assessment of criterion audit
1.
Very
Poor / 2.
Poor
/ 3.
Fair
/ 4.
Good
/ 5.
Very
Good / 6.
Excellent
/ 7.
Outstanding
9. There is a summary of the main issues learned.
Comments:
GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF CRITERION AUDIT
1.
Very
Poor / 2.
Poor
/ 3.
Fair
/ 4.
Good
/ 5.
Very
Good / 6.
Excellent
/ 7.
Outstanding
10.Please rate the audit project(s) overall.
Comments:
VALIDATION JUDGEMENT
Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory
11.For those pharmacists who wish feedback on whether their project is satisfactory or unsatisfactory, please indicate your judgement on the right.
Comments: