Immanuel Kant S Response to the Question: What Is Enlightenment? (1784)

Immanuel Kant S Response to the Question: What Is Enlightenment? (1784)

CS 203 Common Lecture

Monday October 24, 2016

Dr. Nadia Bou Ali

Immanuel Kant’s Response to the Question: What is Enlightenment? (1784)

1-Twentieth century and post modern-critiques of enlightenment

2-Enlightenment as homeless-ness

  1. As a demand for universality and a transcendence of particularities
  2. As the courage to think for oneself
  3. Kasper Hauser example

3-Kant’s Copernican revolution

  1. Previous methods of reflection as optical delusions
  2. Transcendental structures of thought
  3. Valsquez’s Les Meninas and Magritte’s Human Condition
  4. Enlightenment irreducible to a teleology of progress
  5. Age of Enlightenment and not an enlightened age

4-Kant’s Response to the Question what is Enlightenment?

  1. Ethical and pedagogical text, Kant as public intellectual
  2. Enlightenment as critique
  3. Speaking versus seeing (irreducible to liberal freedom of opinion)
  4. Overcoming self-incurred immaturity (quote 1 and 2 below)
  5. Natural law versus ideology (knowledge/ book, religion/ pastor, science/ doctor)
  6. Make full use of understanding
  7. Freedom to make use of reason
  8. Paradoxes of freedom:
  9. Freedom and natural causality:
  10. For Kant the idea that everything is determined by natural cause is made possible by the position that brackets freedom, and conversely only when determination by natural cause is bracketed can the idea of freedom intervene.
  11. Civic and spiritual freedom versus free thinking
  12. Private use of reason versus public use of reason
  13. The “public use of reason” does not simply oppose the individual to their particular surrounding community, but opposes particular communal institutional belongings against a universal exercise of reason

5-Kant as a thinker who offers us an account of the split nature of subjectivity:

  1. Oedipusas Enlightenment figure
  2. As a hostage of his words to the Sphinx
  3. Leaves us with a paradoxical gift of speech
  4. Freedom as the recognition of the causal determination of subjectivity
  5. Oedipus’s ethical act as the choice of the impossible: blindness (while he had always been blind) over suicide
  6. Faced with a moment of terror, an encounter with the truth of his own constitution, Oedipus is reborn as another subject

6-Enlightenment as the persistence of the riddle of the sphinx

Selections from Kant’s “What is Enlightenment”:

“Enlightenment is mankind’s exit from self-incurred immaturity.

Immaturity is the inability to make use of one’s own understanding without the guidance of another.”

“I have a book that has understanding for me, a pastor who has a consciencefor me, a doctor who judges my diet for me, and so forth, surely I do notneed to trouble myself. I have no need to think, if only I can pay; otherswill take over the tedious business for me. Those guardians, who have graciouslytaken up the oversight of mankind, take care that the far greater part of mankind (including the entire fairer sex) regard the step to maturity as not only difficult but also very dangerous.”

“A revolution may perhaps bring about the fall of an autocratic despotism and of an avaricious or overbearing oppression, but it can never bring about the true

reform of a way of thinking. Rather, new prejudices will serve, like the old,

as the leading strings of the thoughtless masses.”

1